Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 16;62:57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.07.037

Table 4.

Analysis of differences between participants who had ever tested or used an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot for questions related to clinical practice and those who had not.

Characteristics Users (n = 80) Non-users (n = 182) p value
Age – years
 <30 10 (12.5) 22 (12.1) >.99
 31–40 39 (48.8) 85 (46.7) .79
 41–50 19 (23.8) 40 (22.0) .75
 51–60 8.0 (10.0) 23 (12.6) .68
 >60 4.0 (5.0) 12 (6.6) .78
Sex
 Male 69 (86.3) 116 (63.7) <.001
 Female 11 (13.8) 66 (36.3) <.001
Position
 Consultant or attending physician 50 (62.5) 118 (64.8) .78
 Fellow 22 (27.5) 45 (24.7) .65
 Resident doctor 6 (7.5) 14 (7.7) >.99
 Not specified 2 (2.5) 5 (2.7) >.99
Number of years of practice of vascular surgery (starting from the beginning of residency) – years
 0–5 23 (28.8) 48 (26.4) .76
 6–10 18 (22.5) 44 (24.2) .87
 11–15 17 (21.3) 34 (18.7) .61
 16–20 10 (12.5) 24 (13.2) >.99
 >20 12 (15.0) 32 (17.6) .72
Type of health institute
 University hospital 65 (81.3) 124 (68.1) .036
 Regional hospital 13 (16.3) 39 (21.4) .40
 Private healthcare institution 9 (11.3) 32 (17.6) .27
Past training or course related to AI in healthcare
 University degree or university course in AI 3 (3.8) 2.0 (1.1) .17
 Research activity in AI 13 (16.3) 7 (3.8) .002
 Attendance to conferences in AI 13 (16.3) 7 (3.8) .006
 No training or course 54 (67.5) 167 (91.8) <.001
Rate your knowledge about the abilities of AI chatbots
 Very good 6 (7.5) 2.0 (1.1) .011
 Good 28 (35) 28 (15.4) <.001
 Average 31 (38.8) 61 (33.5) .48
 Poor 14 (17.5) 65 (35.7) .003
 Very poor 1.0 (1.3) 26 (14.3) <.001
Rate how experienced you are in the use of AI chatbots
 Very experienced 6 (7.5) 1 (0.5) <.001
 Somewhat experienced 24 (30.0) 17 (9.3) <.001
 Average 27 (33.8) 50 (27.5) .31
 Somewhat inexperienced 20 (25) 56 (30.8) .38
 Very inexperienced 3 (3.8) 58 (31.9) <.001

Multiple answers possible.