Table 4.
Characteristics | Users (n = 80) | Non-users (n = 182) | p value |
---|---|---|---|
Age – years | |||
<30 | 10 (12.5) | 22 (12.1) | >.99 |
31–40 | 39 (48.8) | 85 (46.7) | .79 |
41–50 | 19 (23.8) | 40 (22.0) | .75 |
51–60 | 8.0 (10.0) | 23 (12.6) | .68 |
>60 | 4.0 (5.0) | 12 (6.6) | .78 |
Sex | |||
Male | 69 (86.3) | 116 (63.7) | <.001 |
Female | 11 (13.8) | 66 (36.3) | <.001 |
Position | |||
Consultant or attending physician | 50 (62.5) | 118 (64.8) | .78 |
Fellow | 22 (27.5) | 45 (24.7) | .65 |
Resident doctor | 6 (7.5) | 14 (7.7) | >.99 |
Not specified | 2 (2.5) | 5 (2.7) | >.99 |
Number of years of practice of vascular surgery (starting from the beginning of residency) – years | |||
0–5 | 23 (28.8) | 48 (26.4) | .76 |
6–10 | 18 (22.5) | 44 (24.2) | .87 |
11–15 | 17 (21.3) | 34 (18.7) | .61 |
16–20 | 10 (12.5) | 24 (13.2) | >.99 |
>20 | 12 (15.0) | 32 (17.6) | .72 |
Type of health institute∗ | |||
University hospital | 65 (81.3) | 124 (68.1) | .036 |
Regional hospital | 13 (16.3) | 39 (21.4) | .40 |
Private healthcare institution | 9 (11.3) | 32 (17.6) | .27 |
Past training or course related to AI in healthcare∗ | |||
University degree or university course in AI | 3 (3.8) | 2.0 (1.1) | .17 |
Research activity in AI | 13 (16.3) | 7 (3.8) | .002 |
Attendance to conferences in AI | 13 (16.3) | 7 (3.8) | .006 |
No training or course | 54 (67.5) | 167 (91.8) | <.001 |
Rate your knowledge about the abilities of AI chatbots | |||
Very good | 6 (7.5) | 2.0 (1.1) | .011 |
Good | 28 (35) | 28 (15.4) | <.001 |
Average | 31 (38.8) | 61 (33.5) | .48 |
Poor | 14 (17.5) | 65 (35.7) | .003 |
Very poor | 1.0 (1.3) | 26 (14.3) | <.001 |
Rate how experienced you are in the use of AI chatbots | |||
Very experienced | 6 (7.5) | 1 (0.5) | <.001 |
Somewhat experienced | 24 (30.0) | 17 (9.3) | <.001 |
Average | 27 (33.8) | 50 (27.5) | .31 |
Somewhat inexperienced | 20 (25) | 56 (30.8) | .38 |
Very inexperienced | 3 (3.8) | 58 (31.9) | <.001 |
Multiple answers possible.