Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 28;24:789. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05359-6

Table 1.

Quality assessment of the included studies

Study Outcome Study design Quality assessment tool Total score Quality
Wang et al., 2008 [21] Cost Cross-sectional study AHRQ 6 Moderate
Liu et al., 2009 [22] Cost Cross-sectional study AHRQ 6 Moderate
Wang et al., 2012 [23] Cost Cross-sectional study AHRQ 6 Moderate
Deng et al., 2016 [24] Cost Cross-sectional study AHRQ 5 Moderate
Ku et al., 2016 [25] Cost Cross-sectional study AHRQ 7 Moderate
Yan et al., 2019 [26] Cost Cross-sectional study AHRQ 8 High
Huang et al., 2020 [27] Cost Cross-sectional study AHRQ 7 Moderate
Wu et al., 2020 [28] Cost Cross-sectional study AHRQ 6 Moderate
Tang, 2006 [29] QoL Cross-sectional study AHRQ 7 Moderate
Chen et al., 2009 [30] QoL Cross-sectional study AHRQ 9 High
Ai, 2011 [32] QoL Cross-sectional study AHRQ 7 Moderate
Che et al., 2011 [33] QoL Cross-sectional study AHRQ 7 Moderate
Lian et al., 2011 [34] QoL Cross-sectional study AHRQ 5 Moderate
Chan et al., 2011 [35] QoL Cross-sectional study AHRQ 7 Moderate
Huang et al., 2015 [37] QoL Cross-sectional study AHRQ 8 High
Huang, 2016 [38] QoL Cross-sectional study AHRQ 7 Moderate
Wu et al., 2016 [39] QoL Cross-sectional study AHRQ 7 Moderate
Su et al., 2019 [40] QoL Cross-sectional study AHRQ 7 Moderate
Zhang et al., 2021 [41] QoL Cross-sectional study AHRQ 8 High
He, 2009 [31] QoL Case–control study NOS 5 Moderate
Yi et al., 2015 [36] QoL Case–control study NOS 6 Moderate

AHRQ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, NOS Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, QoL quality of life