Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 27;24:1188. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12937-9

Table 1.

Baseline comparisons in the Triple-negative group (grouped according to the group-based trajectory of CA72-4)

characteristic Total Normal
N = 80
Elevated
N = 25
Descend
N = 22
Stable
N = 29
p-value1
Age, n(%) 0.127
   ≤ 60 63(40.4) 31(38.8) 14(56) 5(22.7) 13(44.8)
   > 60 93(59.6) 49(61.3) 11(44) 17(77.3) 16(55.2)
Sex, n(%) 0.034
   Male 112(71.8) 56(70) 18(72) 21(95.5) 17(58.6)
   Female 44(28.2) 24(30) 7(28) 1(4.5) 12(41.4)
ECOG scores, n(%) 0.995
   0 97(62.2) 50(62.5) 15(60) 14(63.6) 18(62.1)
   1/2 59(37.8) 30(37.5) 10(40) 8(36.4) 11(37.9)
ypT, n(%) 0.058
   0/1 24(15.4) 12(15) 9(36) 3(13.6) 0
   2 33(21.2) 16(20) 2(8) 6(27.3) 9(31)
   3 60(38.4) 33(41.3) 7(28) 8(36.4) 12(41.4)
   4 39(25) 19(23.7) 7(28) 5(22.7) 8(27.6)
ypN, n(%) 0.774
   0 62(39.8) 31(38.8) 11(44) 10(45.5) 10(34.5)
   1 36(23.1) 20(25) 6(24) 6(27.3) 4(13.8)
   2 30(19.2) 17(21.2) 3(12) 3(13.6) 7(24.1)
   3 28(17.9) 12(15) 5(20) 3(13.6) 8(27.6)
Location, n(%) 0.560
   Upper 65(41.7) 35(43.8) 9(36) 7(31.8) 14(48.3)
   Middle 37(23.7) 16(20) 6(24) 8(36.4) 7(24.1)
   Lower 43(27.6) 26(32.5) 7(28) 5(22.7) 5(17.3)
   Mixed 11(7) 3(3.7) 3(12) 2(9.1) 3(10.3)
Lymphovascular Invasion, n(%) 0.388
   No 96(61.5) 53(66.3) 16(64) 13(59.1) 14(48.3)
   Yes 60(38.5) 27(33.7) 9(36) 9(40.9) 15(51.7)
Neural Invasion, n(%) 0.400
   No 68(43.6) 33(41.3) 13(52) 12(54.5) 10(34.5)
   Yes 88(56.4) 47(58.7) 12(48) 10(45.5) 19(65.5)
TRG grade, n(%) 0.625
   0/1 39(25) 18(22.5) 8(32) 7(31.8) 6(20.7)
   2/3 117(75) 62(77.5) 17(68) 15(68.2) 23(79.3)
NACT regimens, n(%) 0.995
   Platinum based 64(41) 32(40) 11(44) 8(36.4) 13(44.8)
   Paclitaxel based 63(40.4) 33(41.3) 10(40) 9(40.9) 11(37.9)
   Others 29(18.6) 15(18.7) 4(16) 5(22.7) 5(17.3)
NACT cycles, Median (IQR) 4(3–4) 4(3–4) 3(3–4) 4(3–4) 3(3–4) 0.735
AC regimes, n(%) 0.986
   Platinum based 55(41.4) 27(40.9) 11(45.8) 7(33.3) 10(45.4)
   Paclitaxel based 52(39.1) 26(39.4) 9(37.5) 9(42.9) 8(36.4)
   Others 26(19.5) 13(19.7) 4(16.7) 5(23.8) 4(18.2)
AC, n(%) 0.178
   No 19(12.2) 11(13.8) 1(4) 1(4.5) 6(20.7)
   Yes 137(87.8) 69(86.3) 24(96) 21(95.5) 23(79.3)
Complication, n(%) 0.349
   No 140(89.7) 75(93.8) 22(88) 19(86.4) 24(82.8)
   Yes 16(10.3) 5(6.3) 3(12) 3(13.6) 5(17.2)
LOS, Median (IQR) 8(7–10) 8(7–10) 8(7–9) 8(7–9) 9(7–12) 0.282
Operative time, Median (IQR)

185

(157–220)

190

(160–225)

180

(150–210)

199

(165–210)

180

(155–221)

0.277
Bleed, Median (IQR) 35(30–50) 35(30–50) 30(30–50) 40(30–50) 30(30–60) 0.861

1: One-way ANOVA; Pearson’s Chi-squared test; Fisher’s exact test

Bold values indicated that the P value < 0.05

Abbreviation ECOG score: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status score; ypT: Tumor (T pathological stage) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; ypN: Nodes pathological stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; TRG: Tumor Regression Grade; NACT: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; CA72-4: Carbohydrate antigen 72 − 4; LOS: length of stay