Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 28;5(2):95–113. doi: 10.12336/biomatertransl.2024.02.002

Table 2. The pros and cons of commonly used nanoparticles.

Nanoparticle Pros Cons Reference
Liposomes Increased drug therapeutic efficiency, increased drug stability, low toxicity, tunability, biocompatibility Low solubility, high cost, leakage/fusion, short half-life 110
Micelles Small sizes, simple preparation, high encapsulation capacity, increased water solubility Fast clearance, stability concern, limited drug loading, critical micelle concentration 111-113
Polymersomes Chemical versatility, increased stability than liposomes, flexible cargo capacity, prolonged half-life Inferior biocompatibility/biodegradability, low permeability, disintergration 114, 115
Polyplexes Tunability, protect nucleic acids from degeneration, high water solubility Toxicity, biodegradability concern, low transfection efficiency 116
Dendrimers Increased drug solubility, tunability, covalently binding cargo, increased drug exposure time/efficiency High cost, toxicity, scalability, stability 113
Gold nanoparticles Uniformity, tunability, increased surface area, enhanced loading capacity Toxicity 117, 118
Avidin High biotin affinity, preferable versatility, non-toxicity, electronic interaction Immunogenicity, toxicity, denaturation concerns 119
Exosomes Versatility, biocompatibility, improved targeting Scalability, heterogeneity, the lack of standard administrative protocol 120, 121