Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 28;25:44. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00787-x

Table 3.

Literature review of the outcome studies regarding FVFG and the MT

Author Year Cases, n Mean defect size, cm (range) Mean time to union, months (range) Reported union, n (%) Mean follow up, months (range) Complications, n (%)
FVFG
 Dell [45] 1984 4 N/A N/A 3 (75%) N/A 0
 Olekas [46] 1991 15 9.3 (5–12) N/A 11 (73.3%) 23.5 (7–60) 4 (26.7%)
 Jupiter [47] 1997 9 7.9 (4.5–11) N/A 8 (88.9%) 24 3 (33.3%)
 Adani [31] 2004 12 8.5 (6–13) 4.8 (2.5–8) 11 (91.6%) N/A (10–93) 3 (25%)
 Safoury [48] 2005 18 N/A 4 (N/A) 17 (94.4%) N/A N/A
 Cano-Luís [6] 2018 14 N/A (6–11) 4.3 (2.5–7) 13 (92.9%) 166.8 (96–276) 4 (28.58%)
MT
 Luo [41] 2017 7 5.6 (4–8) N/A 7 (100%) 86.7 (41–150) 4 (57.14%)
 Dhar [49] 2019 12 5 (3.5–7) 7.8 (6–12) 12 (100%) N/A 0
 Walker [42] 2019 9 3.9 (1.7–5.4) 4.7 (3–12) 9 (100%) 4.7 (3–12) 1 (11.11%)
 Bourgeois [50] 2020 6 6.4 (4.8–11.0) 4 (2.3–6.3) 5 (83.3%) 103.4 (67.4–144.3) 3 (50%)
 Commeil [11] 2021 10 4.3 (2–8) 9.2 (4–13) 9 (90%) 50.3 (14–74) 1 (10%)
 Lauthe [51] 2021 13 4 (0–12) 5 (3–8) 12 (92.3%) 30 2 (15.38%)

FVFG free vascularized fibular grafts, MT Masquelet technique