Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 31;44(4):252–260. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2331

Table II.

Comparison between EEA and a combined EEA-OPF approach in the population.

EEA EEA-OPF
N (% / IQR) N (% / IQR)
Number of patients 18 (60%) 12 (40%)
Median age (years) 55 (45-62) 63 (54-78)
Previous sinonasal surgery
      Yes, for previous IP 6 (33.3%) 5 (41.7%)
      Yes, for other pathologies 5 (27.8%) 2 (16.6%)
      No 7 (38.9%) 5 (41.7%)
Insertion point
      Infundibulum 3 (16.7%) 1 (8.3%)
      Posterior wall 3 (16.7%) 2 (16.7%)
      Anterior wall 2 (11.1%) 1 (8.3%)
      Lateral recess 1 (5.6%) -
      Medial wall 1 (5.6%) -
      Orbital roof 2 (11.1%) 2 (16.7%)
      Diffuse insertion in the frontal sinus 1 (5.6%) -
      Unknown 5 (27.8%) 6 (50%)
Lateral frontal sinus extension (in relation to the orbital roof)
      Medial third 2 (11.1%) 2 (16.7%)
      Central third 12 (66.7%) 7 (58.3%)
      Lateral third 4 (22.2%) 3 (25%)
Posterior wall shape
      Straight 2 (11.1%) 2 (16.7%)
      C-shaped 9 (50%) 6 (50%)
      S-shaped 5 (27.7%) 2 (16.7%)
      Unknown 2 (11.1%) 2 (16.7%)
Inter-orbital distance (median in mm) 22.3 (20.6-25.4) 21.2 (19-25.1)
Anteroposterior recess distance (median in mm) 8.3 (6.9-11.3) 10 (7.9-12.6)
Follow-up (months) 32.5 (14-43.7) 40.5 (17.7-132.7)
Recurrence
      Yes 2 (11.1%) 1 (8.3%)
      Inside frontal sinus 2 (100%) -
      Outside frontal sinus - 1 (100%)
      No 16 (88.9%) 11 (91.7%)
Postoperative complications
      Yes 6 (33.3%) 8 (66.7%)
      Mucoceles 5 (83.3%) 8 (100%)
      Inflammatory stenosis 1 (16.7%) -
      No 12 (66.7%) 3 (25%)
      Unknown - 1 (8.3%)
EEA: endoscopic endonasal approach; OPF: osteoplastic flap; IQR: interquartile range.