Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 2;5(9):1311–1321. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000532

Table 5.

Subanalysis of the very elderly group, ≥85 years

Variable DRT >12 h Total Fatigue Score ≥4
OR 95% CI P Value OR 95% CI P Value
Sex. ref. male 0.42 0.12 to 1.41 0.160 1.31 0.45 to 3.84 0.620
Dialysis vintage 0.99 0.99 to 1.01 0.775 0.99 0.98 to 1.01 0.696
Catheter use 1.14 0.25 to 5.23 0.863 0.61 0.15 to 2.59 0.508
Hemodiafiltration ref. conventional hemodialysis 4.2 1.04 to 17.03 0.045 1.57 0.53 to 4.69 0.419
Intradialytic change in serum sodium 0.96 0.79 to 1.17 0.676 1.17 0.96 to 1.43 0.125
Dialysate sodium 0.91 0.72 to 1.16 0.464 0.98 0.78 to 1.22 0.835
Duration of session 1.01 0.99 to 1.04 0.287 0.99 0.97 to 1.02 0.715
Intradialytic body weight loss 1.05 0.58 to 1.91 0.866 0.92 0.52 to 1.59 0.753
Hemoglobin level 0.97 0.55 to 1.72 0.926 0.51 0.28 to 0.93 0.029

Univariate logistic regression analysis of factors was performed for both dependent variables. In a model 1 adjusting for intradialytic body weight loss, hemodiafiltration was associated with dialysis recovery time (odds ratio=4.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.99 to 17.13; P = 0.05). In a model 2 adjusting for body mass index, hemodiafiltration was less associated with dialysis recovery time (odds ratio=3.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 15.9; P = 0.058). 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; DRT, dialysis recovery time; OR, odds ratio.

Fifty-five patients were age 85 years and above.