TABLE 3.
Confusion matrix when predicting the 20% unseen testing dataset using the model obtained through the 80% training set, where (A) used the optimal tree model and (B) the reduced tree model.
| Prediction | A reference | B reference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | Moderate | Poor – very poor | Good | Moderate | Poor – very poor | |
| Good | 46 | 7 | 2 | 50 | 5 | 0 |
| Moderate | 10 | 15 | 4 | 14 | 12 | 3 |
| Poor – very poor | 2 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Note: The matrix displays the number of cases of each nutritional status.