The tolerance of terrestrial ecosystems to anthropogenic stress and climate change has received increasing attention considering the intensification of global changes caused by human activities 1 . Improvement of the carbon sequestration capacity and ability to mitigate global changes in ecosystems, especially forest ecosystems, are simultaneously receiving increasing attention owing to the lack of sufficient effective negative emission technologies 1 , 2 . However, considering the upper limit of the ecosystem service function of terrestrial plants, methods to further enhance the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to cope with global changes have become a topic of concern for researchers 3 , 4 . Mycorrhizal fungi can form stable symbiotic relationships with plants and promote plant stress resistance and nutrient element utilization efficiency, thereby enhancing soil carbon sequestration 5 , 6 , 7 . Consequently, mycorrhizal fungi are considered crucial in enhancing the resilience of terrestrial ecosystems against global environmental change. Studying and utilizing the ecosystem service functions of mycorrhizal fungi have, therefore, become vital to cope with global changes.
Mycorrhizal fungi are commonly divided into four types (arbuscular mycorrhizal, orchid mycorrhizal, ericoid mycorrhizal, and ectomycorrhizal fungi), of which the most common and important are arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizal fungi 8 , 9 . Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi have a higher diversity (approximately 72% of all mycorrhizal fungal species) and larger distribution range (approximately 70% of global terrestrial ecosystems) than ectomycorrhizal fungi, thus receiving more attention from researchers 8 , 10 , 11 . Over the past 24 years, according to the Web of Science, although the literature on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizal fungi has demonstrated an increasing trend, the literature on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi has been far greater than that on ectomycorrhizal fungi (Figure 1A). In 2023, the literature on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi was 5.7 times that in 2000. In comparison, the literature on ectomycorrhizal fungi increased only 2.5 times over the same period (Figure 1A). The literature on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi was approximately 4 times that of ectomycorrhizal fungi in 2023 (Figure 1A). This seems to indicate that researchers generally believe that the ecological role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is higher than that of ectomycorrhizal fungi. However, is this the case?
Figure 1.

Role of ectomycorrhizal fungi. (A) Number of publications on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF). Data are from the Web of Science (keywords: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizal fungi). (B) Role of ectomycorrhizal fungi in protecting terrestrial ecosystems and responding to global changes.
COMPARISON OF PLANT RESISTANCE ENHANCEMENT
The biggest difference between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizal fungi is that the hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi extend into the cells of the root system, while the hyphae of ectomycorrhizal fungi are encapsulated outside the cells, eventually forming a biofilm on the surface of the root system. Ectomycorrhizal fungi act as a protective armor for plant roots against pathogenic microorganisms 12 , 13 , soil pollutants 14 , 15 , and even nuclear radiation 16 , 17 ; this biofilm enhances the environmental resistance of plants. Moreover, such fungi facilitate the direct uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus from soil organic matter, which not only boosts the survival ability of plants under increased nutrient acquisition efficiency but also makes plants more adaptable to harsh environments, such as drought, low nutrient availability, and cold conditions 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 . Ectomycorrhizal fungi also protect biodiversity in high‐latitude temperate regions through their interactions with plants 13 , 19 , 22 . Although arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can improve plant nutrient acquisition efficiency, no advantage over ectomycorrhizal fungi in other aspects has been found 23 , 24 , making them unsuitable for coping with harsh environments caused by global changes.
COMPARISON OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION IMPROVEMENT
Fungal mycelia, especially the biofilm and fruiting body of ectomycorrhizal fungi, are primarily composed of compounds that are difficult to decompose. These microbial residues are constantly transported into the soil carbon pool, promoting underground carbon sequestration (known as the “entombing effect”) 25 . This effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, however, is not as strong as that of ectomycorrhizal fungi 24 . Ectomycorrhizal fungi are believed to directly “mine” nitrogen from organic substrates through the enzymes, which can reduce their ability to decompose litter and soil organic matter, thereby slowing down organic matter decomposition and reducing the loss of soil carbon 23 , 24 . By contrast, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi require the decomposition of saprophytes into inorganic matter before they can utilize soil nutrients, also resulting in some carbon loss 20 . Therefore, plants that have symbiotic relationships with ectomycorrhizal fungi can overcome nutrient limitations, enhance their tolerance to climate, and increase their biomass, thus making the ecosystem dominated by ectomycorrhizal fungi have higher biomass than that dominated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi 6 , 26 , 27 , 28 . Plant species associated with ectomycorrhizal fungi show a biomass increase of approximately 30% for elevated CO2, while plant species associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi show almost zero change in biomass 29 .
SUGGESTIONS FOR THE FUTURE
In summary, compared to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, ectomycorrhizal fungi can effectively increase soil and biomass carbon pools, reduce soil carbon loss, and have greater climate change mitigation potential (Figure 1B). Considering the several advantages of ectomycorrhizal fungi in enhancing the capacity of terrestrial ecosystems to cope with global environmental change, the following recommendations are made:
-
1.
More attention should be paid to the study of ectomycorrhizal fungi and current research is insufficient. Extreme climate change, for example, increasing temperatures and rainfall, impairs the growth and development of ectomycorrhizal fungi 30 , 31 , 32 . Therefore, future research should explore mechanisms for maintaining the competitiveness of ectomycorrhizal fungi under high temperatures and heavy rainfall.
-
2.
Considering that ectomycorrhizal fungi are more adapted to harsh environments, such as dry, cold, and barren environments 6 , 19 , 21 and because ectomycorrhizal fungi are often dominant species in the topsoil community 8 , 33 , 34 , the intentional introduction of ectomycorrhizal fungi during ecosystem restoration activities, such as afforestation and grass planting, could accelerate the community succession processes and enable ectomycorrhizal fungi to provide their ecosystem services and functions.
-
3.
Globally, ecosystems dominated by ectomycorrhizal fungi are not widespread, and anthropogenic transformation of ecosystems has reduced the presence of ectomycorrhizal vegetation, with potential implications for terrestrial carbon storage 10 . Therefore, the distribution range and dominance of ectomycorrhizal fungi could be expanded to enhance their role in terrestrial ecosystems. For example, artificial inoculation or sowing could be used to establish ecosystems dominated by ectomycorrhizal fungi, which would enhance the capacity of terrestrial ecosystems to cope with global environmental change 35 .
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32301442).
Song W. Ectomycorrhizal fungi: potential guardians of terrestrial ecosystems. mLife. 2024;3:387–390. 10.1002/mlf2.12127
Editor: Yunfeng Yang, Tsinghua University, China
REFERENCES
- 1. Tanentzap AJ, Kolmakova O. Global change ecology: science to heal a damaged planet. PLoS Biol. 2023;21:e3002455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Jeswani HK, Saharudin DM, Azapagic A. Environmental sustainability of negative emissions technologies: a review. Sustain Prod Consum. 2022;33:608–635. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rammig A, Mahecha MD. Ecosystem responses to climate extremes. Nature. 2015;527:315–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Thakur MP, Risch AC, van der Putten WH. Biotic responses to climate extremes in terrestrial ecosystems. iScience. 2022;25:104559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Branco S, Schauster A, Liao HL, Ruytinx J. Mechanisms of stress tolerance and their effects on the ecology and evolution of mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2022;235:2158–2175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Allsup CM, George I, Lankau RA. Shifting microbial communities can enhance tree tolerance to changing climates. Science. 2023;380:835–840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Xue He He, Wang W, Wang X, Zhang B, Shi F, Kurakov AV, et al. The potential of mycorrhizal fungi to increase terrestrial ecosystem carbon sink: a review. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2023;56:1724–1738. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Genre A, Lanfranco L, Perotto S, Bonfante P. Unique and common traits in mycorrhizal symbioses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18:649–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Janowski D, Leski T. Factors in the distribution of mycorrhizal and soil fungi. Diversity. 2022;14:1122. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Soudzilovskaia NA, van Bodegom PM, Terrer C, Zelfde M, McCallum I, Luke McCormack M, et al. Global mycorrhizal plant distribution linked to terrestrial carbon stocks. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Barceló M, van Bodegom PM, Soudzilovskaia NA. Climate drives the spatial distribution of mycorrhizal host plants in terrestrial ecosystems. J Ecol. 2019;107:2564–2573. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Chen L, Swenson NG, Ji N, Mi X, Ren H, Guo L, et al. Differential soil fungus accumulation and density dependence of trees in a subtropical forest. Science. 2019;366:124–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Song W, Zhou Y. Linking leaf δ15N and δ13C with soil fungal biodiversity, ectomycorrhizal and plant pathogenic abundance in forest ecosystems of China. Catena. 2021;200:105176. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Zobel M. How mycorrhizal associations drive plant population and community biology. Science. 2020;367:eaba1223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Xiao Y, Liu C, Hu N, Wang B, Zheng K, Zhao Z, et al. Contributions of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a reclaimed poplar forest (Populus yunnanensis) in an abandoned metal mine tailings pond, southwest China. J Hazard Mater. 2023;448:130962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Cheng F, Huang X, Qin Q, Chen Z, Li F, Song W. The effect of aboveground long‐term low‐dose ionizing radiation on soil microbial diversity and structure. Front Ecol Evol. 2023;11:1184582. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Zeng G, Wen Y, Luo C, Zhang Y, Li F, Xiong C. Plant–microorganism–soil interaction under long‐term low‐dose ionizing radiation. Front Microbiol. 2024;14:1331477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zheng H, Phillips RP, Rousk J, Yue K, Schmidt IK, Peng Y, et al. Imprint of tree species mycorrhizal association on microbial‐mediated enzyme activity and stoichiometry. Funct Ecol. 2023;37:1366–1376. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Zheng L, Song W. Phosphorus limitation of trees influences forest soil fungal diversity in China. Forests. 2022;13:223. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Guo L, Deng M, Li X, Schmid B, Huang J, Wu Y, et al. Evolutionary and ecological forces shape nutrient strategies of mycorrhizal woody plants. Ecol Lett. 2024;27:e14330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wu T, Tissue DT, Su W, Li X, Yang S, Liu X, et al. Long‐term field translocation differentially affects arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal trees in a sub‐tropical forest. Agricult Forest Meterol. 2023;342:109724. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Song W. Negative linear or unimodal: why forest soil fungal latitudinal diversity differs across China. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11:e02515–e02522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Mayer M, Matthews B, Sandén H, Katzensteiner K, Hagedorn F, Gorfer M, et al. Soil fertility determines whether ectomycorrhizal fungi accelerate or decelerate decomposition in a temperate forest. New Phytol. 2023;239:325–339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Liu B, Fan X, Meng D, Liu Z, Gao D, Chang Q, et al. Ectomycorrhizal trees rely on nitrogen resorption less than arbuscular mycorrhizal trees globally. Ecol Lett. 2024;27:e14346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Liang C. Soil microbial carbon pump: mechanism and appraisal. Soil Ecol Lett. 2020;2:241–254. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Terrer C, Vicca S, Hungate BA, Phillips RP, Reich PB, Franklin O, et al. Response to comment on “mycorrhizal association as a primary control of the CO2 fertilization effect”. Science. 2017;355:358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Anthony MA, Crowther TW, Van Der Linde S, Suz LM, Bidartondo MI, Cox F, et al. Forest tree growth is linked to mycorrhizal fungal composition and function across Europe. ISME J. 2022;16:1327–1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Mao Z, van der Plas F, Corrales A, Anderson‐Teixeira KJ, Bourg NA, Chu C, et al. Scale‐dependent diversity–biomass relationships can be driven by tree mycorrhizal association and soil fertility. Ecol Monograph. 2023;93:e1568. [Google Scholar]
- 29. Terrer C, Vicca S, Hungate BA, Phillips RP, Prentice IC. Mycorrhizal association as a primary control of the CO2 fertilization effect. Science. 2016;353:72–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Steidinger BS, Crowther TW, Liang J, Van Nuland ME, Werner GDA, Reich PB, et al. Climatic controls of decomposition drive the global biogeography of forest‐tree symbioses. Nature. 2019;569:404–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Gomes SIF, van Bodegom PM, Merckx VSFT, Soudzilovskaia NA. Global distribution patterns of mycoheterotrophy. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2019;28:1133–1145. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bennett AE, Classen AT. Climate change influences mycorrhizal fungal–plant interactions, but conclusions are limited by geographical study bias. Ecology. 2020;101:e02978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hannula SE, Morriën E, de Hollander M, van der Putten WH, van Veen JA, De Boer W. Shifts in rhizosphere fungal community during secondary succession following abandonment from agriculture. ISME J. 2017;11:2294–2304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Song W, Liu Y. Microbial taxa and soil organic carbon accumulation driven by tree roots. Forests. 2018;9:333. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Thomas PW, Jump AS. Edible fungi crops through mycoforestry, potential for carbon negative food production and mitigation of food and forestry conflicts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120:e2220079120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
