Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 1;24:800. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05393-4

Table 1.

GRADE assessment of evidence quality

Outcome No. of Studies Study Design Relative Effect Confidence Interval Risk of Bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Quality of Evidence
5 x time sit-to-stand 5 RCTs -0.18 [-0.36, 0.00] Moderate Not serious (I²=0%) Not serious Very serious

⊕⊕◯◯

Low

Knee extension strength 2 RCTs 0.21 [-0.60, 1.03] Moderate Very serious (I²=71%) Not serious Very serious

⊕◯◯◯

Very low

10 m walking speed 4 RCTs 0.18 [-0.10, 0.46] Moderate Not serious (I²=30%) Not serious Serious ⊕⊕⊕◯ Moderate
TUG 2 RCTs -0.08 [-0.32, 0.17] Moderate Not serious (I²=0%) Not serious Serious

⊕⊕⊕◯

Moderate

SPPB 3 RCTs 1.14 [-1.09, 3.37] Moderate Very serious (I²=98%) Not serious Very serious

⊕◯◯◯

Very low

RCT = Randomised controlled trial; TUG = Timed up and go test; SPPB = Short Physical Performance Battery