Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 18;3:13337. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13337

TABLE 3.

Primary and secondary outcomes.

No. of studies analysed Incidence in TCS group* Incidence in control group* Relative risk or mean difference (95% CI)**
Primary outcome: AWD
Intention-to-treat  missing 7 1.7% (27/1,565)
105
2.8% (40/1,430)
109
0.70 (0.44–1.11) a
As-treated  missing 7 1.7% (26/1,562)
104
2.9% (41/1,432)
110
0.67 (0.41–1.07) a
Per-protocol  missing 7 1.5% (23/1,492)
42
2.9% (40/1,402)
52
0.58 (0.34–0.99) a
Secondary outcomes
Incisional SSI  missing 7 10.3% (163/1,576)
94
13.8% (198/1,439)
100
0.80 (0.67–0.97) a
Skin dehiscence  missing 3 10.4% (83/797)
91
11.6% (94/810)
100
0.94 (0.69–1.27) a
Hospital stay (days)§ median, IQR
 missing
7 12 (9–19)
75
12 (9–17)
78
2.76 (2.72–2.81) b
All-cause reoperation (30 days)  missing 6 9.7% (158/1,623)
63
8.4% (125/1,490)
57
1.18 (0.93–1.48) a
All-cause mortality (30 days)  missing 6 1.2% (19/1,625)
0
1.9% (28/1,491)
0
0.67 (0.38–1.19) c

* Based on crude IPD.

** Missing data at participant level were imputed.

According to the suture that was actually used during surgery. One participant received both TCS, and control suture and was excluded from the as-treated analysis.

According to the as-treated principle and excluding participants that were reoperated for any reason other than AWD.

§ Presented as median and interquartile range and analysed using bootstrapping because of a non-normal data distribution.

Three participants from one trial deceased within 30 days after surgery and data on reoperation were not available. These data were not imputed.

Variables included in the model:

a

gender, age, procedure type, type of surgery, diabetes mellitus

b

no adjustment

c

gender, age, procedure type, diabetes mellitus.

Bold indicates statistically significant results