Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 27;8(16):4459–4475. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012467

Table 2.

PK parameters (PK population)

Exposure in patients who received etavopivat Tmax, h Cmax, ng/mL AUC0-24, ng×h/mL t½, h CL/F, L/h
Single dose
 700 mg (n = 5) 2.0 (1.0-4.0) 2894 (1450); 50.1 7552 (3294); 43.6 16.9 (7.1); 41.8 102.0 (50.8); 49.8
Once-daily multiple doses
300 mg for 2 wk
 Day 1 (n = 8) 1.0 (0.9-2.1) 884 (339); 38.3 2508 (995); 39.7 4.9 (0.9); 18.4 136.6 (61.5); 45.0
 Day 14 (n = 7) -- 760 (412); 54.2 2747 (1047); 38.1 -- 123.5 (46.9); 38.0§
600 mg for 2 wk
 Day 1 (n = 8) 1.8 (1.0-4.1) 1724 (1246); 72.3 6177 (2944); 47.7 4.0 (0.6); 14.4 107.2 (45.0); 42.0
 Day 14 (n = 8) -- 3465 (2136); 61.7 7728 (4218); 54.6 -- 98.8 (50.5); 51.1§
400 mg for 12 wk
 Day 1 (n = 15) 1.8 (1.0-3.9) 1139 (510); 44.8 3474 (1283); 36.9 4.7 (1.2); 25.6# 121.8 (31.6); 26.0#
 Day 84 (n = 13) -- 1288 (684); 53.1 3105 (901); 29.0∗∗ -- 138.2 (37.7); 27.3§,∗∗

A dash indicates not done. ∗Data are presented as arithmetic mean (± standard deviation) and %CV for Cmax, AUC0-24, t½, and CL/F. Data are presented as median (range) for Tmax.

%CV, percent coefficient of variation; AUC0-24, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24; CL/F, apparent clearance; Cmax, maximum concentration; PK, pharmacokinetics; t½, terminal elimination half-life; Tmax, time to maximum concentration.

The difference between the 700-mg dose and the 300-mg, 400-mg, and 600-mg doses in estimated t½ is likely due the reduced sampling schedule during the elimination phase of the PK profile in the MAD and OL cohorts.

n = 4.

n = 7.

§

Steady state.

n = 6.

n = 11.

#

n = 10.

∗∗

n = 9.