Table 4.

Results of the network meta-analysis under the comprehensive approach for overall injuries: Estimates and 95% confidence intervals for comparisons between each pair of injury prevention programs (programs in rows vs. programs in columns).

Program
1	1
2	0.302 [0.098, 0.925]	2
3	0.536 [0.325, 0.886]	1.778 [0.521, 6.071]	3
5	0.492 [0.357, 0.677]	1.63 [0.508, 5.228]	0.917 [0.506, 1.663]	5
7	0.571 [0.497, 0.656]	1.892 [0.612, 5.851]	1.064 [0.632, 1.791]	1.16 [0.819, 1.644]	7
8	0.625 [0.551, 0.709]	2.071 [0.67, 6.396]	1.165 [0.694, 1.955]	1.27 [0.901, 1.791]	1.095 [0.908, 1.32]	8
9	0.977 [0.865, 1.104]	3.238 [1.049, 9.996]	1.821 [1.086, 3.053]	1.986 [1.411, 2.796]	1.712 [1.423, 2.058]	1.564 [1.312, 1.864]	9
10	0.703 [0.572, 0.864]	2.33 [0.746, 7.28]	1.31 [0.762, 2.255]	1.429 [0.977, 2.09]	1.232 [0.961, 1.578]	1.125 [0.884, 1.432]	0.72 [0.566, 0.914]	10
11	0.819 [0.645, 1.039]	2.713 [0.863, 8.531]	1.526 [0.875, 2.66]	1.664 [1.117, 2.479]	1.434 [1.089, 1.889]	1.31 [1, 1.716]	0.838 [0.641, 1.095]	1.164 [0.85, 1.595]	11
12	0.261 [0.147, 0.465]	0.865 [0.245, 3.052]	0.487 [0.227, 1.046]	0.531 [0.275, 1.026]	0.457 [0.253, 0.828]	0.418 [0.232, 0.754]	0.267 [0.148, 0.482]	0.371 [0.201, 0.685]	0.319 [0.171, 0.595]	12
13	0.621 [0.436, 0.885]	2.058 [0.635, 6.666]	1.157 [0.626, 2.14]	1.262 [0.784, 2.034]	1.088 [0.744, 1.591]	0.994 [0.682, 1.447]	0.636 [0.437, 0.924]	0.883 [0.586, 1.33]	0.759 [0.495, 1.162]	2.378 [1.209, 4.679]	13

Note. Program 1 = Control; Program 2 = Strength; Program 3 = Stability; Program 5 = Flexibility; Program 7 = Strength + plyometric + stability + speed & agility + warm-up drills; Program 8 = Strength + plyometric + stability; Program 9 = Strength + plyometric + stability + speed & agility; Program 10 = Strength + plyometric + stability + speed & agility + warm-up drills + flexibility; Program 11 = Stability + flexibility; Program 12 = Strength + stability; Program 13 = Strength + plyometric + stability + warm-up drills + flexibility. Values below 1 favor the row intervention (IPP).