Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 2.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2023 Mar 9;26(4):650–663. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01259-x

Extended Data Fig. 3 |. Functional connectivity differences reveal subgroup-specific atypical connectivity.

Extended Data Fig. 3 |

Subgroups were defined as the modal subgroup assignment over the 1,000 training set replicates, which is used in the main text for Figs. 3–6. (a-d) Heatmaps show patterns of atypical connectivity in each subgroup across brain regions (rows) and functional networks (columns). Thresholded for significant atypical connectivity (two-sided Welch’s t-test, FDR < 0.05), evaluated in N = 69 ASD subjects in subgroup 1, N = 87 ASD subjects in subgroup 2, N = 67 ASD subjects in subgroup 3, N = 76 ASD subjects in subgroup 4, relative to N = 907 neurotypical controls.