Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 2.
Published in final edited form as: Hear Res. 2022 Dec 27;428:108684. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108684

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

ABR wave II amplitude and latency. ABR wave II amplitudes (A-D) and latencies (E-H) were measured with tone burst stimuli at 8, 16, 32, and 48 kHz at 90 dB SPL in male and female CBA/CaJ mice at 5, 17, and 24 months of age: 8 kHz, 5 m (20, 10 males and 10 females), 17 m (21, 11 males and 10 females), 24 m (18, 9 males and 9 females); 16 kHz, 5 m (20, 10 males and 10 females), 17 m (21, 11 males and 10 females), 24 m (19, 10 males and 9 females); 32 kHz, 5 m (20, 10 males and 10 females), 17 m (21, 11 males and 10 females), 24 m (19, 10 males and 9 females); 48 kHz, 5 m (20, 10 males and 10 females), 17 m (21, 11 males and 10 females), 24 m (18, 10 males and 8 females). Data are shown as means ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test was performed; A Wave II amplitude, 8 kHz, Post hoc Bonferroni’s tests showed significant sex differences for 5 m (****, P < 0.0001), sex effect (F = 34.49, DF = 1, P < 0.0001), age effect (F = 61.79, DF = 2, P < 0.0001); interaction (F = 5.727, DF = 2, P = 0.0056); D Wave II amplitude, 48 kHz, Post hoc Bonferroni’s tests showed significant sex differences for 5 m (*, P < 0.05, P = 0.0127), sex effect (F = 5.962, DF = 1, P = 0.0180), age effect (F = 5.325, DF = 2, P = 0.0078), interaction (F = 3.400, DF = 2, P = 0.0408). m, months of age; M, male; F, female.