Table 1.
Descriptive statistics for primary internalizing outcomes and personality dimensions.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | M (SD) | N | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Dysphoria, Baseline | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2.03 (0.68) | 234 |
2 | Dysphoria, Follow-up | 0.62 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2.08 (0.77) | 230 |
3 | Well-beinga, Baseline | −0.46 | −0.38 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 3.06 (0.43) | 234 |
4 | Well-beinga, Follow-up | −0.22 | −0.47 | 0.60 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 3.05 (0.46) | 230 |
5 | Panicb, Baseline | 0.70 | 0.46 | −0.23 | −0.06 | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1.30 (0.40) | 234 |
6 | Panicb, Follow-up | 0.54 | 0.64 | −0.18 | −0.13 | 0.65 | . | . | . | . | . | 1.29 (0.43) | 230 |
7 | N/NE, Baseline | 0.75 | 0.56 | −0.50 | −0.26 | 0.46 | 0.35 | . | . | . | . | 33.24 (10.19) | 234 |
8 | E/PE, Baseline | −0.42 | −0.27 | 0.49 | 0.31 | −0.30 | −0.20 | −0.42 | . | . | . | 38.88 (9.95) | 234 |
9 | Conscientiousness, Baseline | −0.40 | −0.36 | 0.36 | 0.24 | −0.28 | −0.29 | −0.35 | 0.25 | . | . | 41.41 (8.17) | 234 |
10 | Agreeableness, Baseline | −0.37 | −0.33 | 0.38 | 0.28 | −0.26 | −0.23 | −0.44 | 0.25 | 0.30 | . | 44.33 (7.19) | 234 |
11 | Open-mindedness, Baseline | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.20 | −0.01 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 45.63 (7.23) | 234 |
The IDAS ‘Well-being’ scale is conceptualized as an indicator of high positive affect.
IDAS ‘Panic’ is conceptualized as an indicator of anxious arousal symptoms.
Note. Correlations were computed using pairwise deletion. Abbreviations—E/PE = Extraversion/Positive Emotionality; N = sample size; N/NE = Neuroticism/Negative Emotionality; SD = standard deviation