Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 26;59(3):223–229. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000001008

TABLE 1.

Sequence Parameters of 1.5 T and 0.55 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Parameter 1.5 T 0.55 T
Sequence PDwcoronal PDwsagittal T2axial PDwcoronal PDwsagittal T2axial
Fat suppression No No No No No No
Repetition time, ms 2000 2170 4000 1800 1800 4080
Echo time, ms 11 11 67 18 18 100
Voxel size reconstruction, mm3 0.3 × 0.3 × 2.0 0.2 × 0.2 × 2.0 0.3 × 0.3 × 3.0 0.3 × 0.3 × 2.0 0.3 × 0.3 × 2.0 0.4 × 0.4 × 4.0
Voxel size acquisition, mm3 0.62 × 0.59 × 2.0 0.49 × 0.42.2.0 0.76 × 0.55 × 3.0 0.86 × 0.69 × 2.0 0.85 × 0.67 × 2.0 0.9 × 0.7 × 4.0
Interpolation Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Field of view, mm 150 × 150 120 × 120 132 × 170 185 × 220 128 × 149 185 × 220
Acquisition time, min:s 3:04 3:49 1:02 4:03 4:39 5.03
Standard no. slices 13 16 19 13 16 19
Averages 3 2 2 2 2 2
Concatenations 1 1 1 2 2 2
Flip angle, degrees 150 150 150 130 130 130
Receiver bandwidth, Hz/pixel 160 160 191 80 80 80
Acceleration technique GRAPPA GRAPPA GRAPPA No No No
Acceleration factor 2 2 2 NA NA NA
Acceleration software NA NA NA DRS DRS DRS

On both scanners, we applied PDw sequences in coronal and sagittal sequences and T2-weighted sequences in axial orientation. The differences between acquired and reconstructed voxel are depending on the zero-filling interpolation technique used on both scanners. All 0.55 T examinations were performed using a software acceleration technique based on artificial intelligence, which improves the image sharpness and reduces the image noise (Deep Resolve Sharp, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany).

PDw, proton density-weighted; NA, not available; DRS, Deep Resolve Sharp.