Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 27;15(5):2084–2093. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13555

Table 3.

Cox regression analysis of the inflammatory markers‐based cachexia.

Categories Model a (HR, 95% CI) P value Model b (HR, 95% CI) P value Model c (HR, 95% CI) P value
NLR‐based cachexia 1.836 (1.689, 1.996) <0.001 1.489 (1.356, 1.634) <0.001 1.481 (1.348, 1.627) <0.001
IBI‐based cachexia 1.922 (1.768, 2.09) <0.001 1.534 (1.397, 1.683) <0.001 1.504 (1.37, 1.652) <0.001
ALB‐based cachexia 1.874 (1.724, 2.037) <0.001 1.525 (1.389, 1.675) <0.001 1.526 (1.39, 1.676) <0.001
GPS‐based cachexia 1.858 (1.709, 2.019) <0.001 1.493 (1.36, 1.638) <0.001 1.473 (1.341, 1.619) <0.001

Note: Model a: Not adjusted. Model b: Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, TNM stage. Model c: Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, TNM stage, tumour type, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, smoking, drinking and family history.

Abbreviations: ALB, albumin; CI, confidence interval; GPS, Glasgow prognostic score; HR, hazard ratio; IBI, inflammatory burden index; NLR, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio.