Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 10;271(10):6991–6999. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12647-z

Table 1.

Demographical and biomarker data of all three cohorts included in this study

MSA PD HC p value
Total number (n) 47 24 25
Sex (female vs. male) 16 vs. 31 12 vs. 12 11 vs. 14 p = 0.41
Age (y) 59.9 ± 7.8 59.7 ± 8.7 62.4 ± 9.2 p = 0.14
Disease duration (y) 4.0 ± 1.9 4.4 ± 3.3 p = 0.70
Age at first symptom onset 56.1 ± 9.1 55.3 ± 8.0 p = 0.91
MSA-C vs. MSA-P 25 vs. 22
Probable vs. possible MSA1 32 vs. 15
UMSARS I + II (baseline) 43.8 ± 13.9
MDS-UPDRS III (baseline) 43.1 ± 17.8 25.1 ± 12.2 p < 0.001
Patients with available follow-up data (n) 18
Change in UMSARS I + II over 12-month follow-up 11.3 ± 12.2
Biomarkers
Blood samples (n) 47 23 21
Plasma/serum samples (n) 34/132 23/0 21/0
GFAP [pg/ml] 111.8 ± 61.6 93.9 ± 50.1 102.1 ± 78.2 p = 0.45
NfL [pg/ml] 24.3 ± 8.8 10.9 ± 9.0 11.4 ± 4.8 p < 0.0001#.†
CSF samples (n) 15 14 14
GFAP [pg/ml] 17,904.7 ± 6704.3 13,885.0 ± 5074.4 9495.0 ± 5676.1 p < 0.01#
NfL [pg/ml] 4580.1 ± 2254.2 748.1 ± 350.8 703.4 ± 262.2 p < 0.0001#.†
CSF samples with matched plasma samples (n) 15 13 10

Mean values ± SD. 1According to Gilman criteria. 2For serum samples, corresponding plasma levels were calculated using a transformation equation based on matched serum and plasma samples (see Supplement S1)

†MSA vs. PD

#MSA vs. HC