Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 17;9(39):40907–40919. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c06113

Table 2. Prediction Accuracies (R2) for the Test1–Test4 Datasets of the BHC Reactiona.

  Test1 Test2 Test3 Test4
one-hot-RF 0.69 (0.00) 0.67 (0.00) 0.50 (0.00) 0.48 (0.00)
random-RF 0.69 (0.00) 0.82 (0.00) 0.52 (0.00) 0.42 (0.00)
yield-BERT 0.84 (0.01) 0.83 (0.01) 0.74 (0.01) 0.49 (0.02)
T5Chem 0.82 (0.01) 0.91 (0.01) 0.76 (0.01) 0.55 (0.01)
XGBoost 0.88 (0.00) 0.89 (0.00) 0.60 (0.00) 0.58 (0.00)
MPNN-transformer 0.87 (0.01) 0.88 (0.01) 0.59 (0.03) 0.64 (0.01)
MPNN-transformer(3.0m) 0.87 (0.01) 0.90 (0.00) 0.74 (0.01) 0.61 (0.01)
*DFT-RF(2) 0.80 0.77 0.64 0.54
*Mol2Vec-MPNN(9) 0.92 0.88 0.60 0.39
a

For each model and dataset, the average (standard deviation) of the R2 value for the Test1–Test4 datasets of the BHC reaction using the five ensemble models is reported. *For DFT-RF(2) and Mol2Vec-MPNN,9 the reported values are given, so direct comparison may not be appropriate. For each test dataset, the three highest R2 values are highlighted in bold.