Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 11;48(6):1050–1087. doi: 10.1177/0193841X231194565

Table 4.

Matching Quality Checks.

Outcome Variable Matching Algorithm Sample Pseudo R2 LR χ2 P>χ2 Mean Bias Median Bias
Community education Nearest neighbour (NNM) Unmatched .115 174.270 .000 16.300 13.700
Matched .013 7.610 1.000 3.500 2.600
Kernel (KM) Unmatched .115 174.270 .000 16.300 13.700
Matched .231 12.970 .989 5.300 4.400
Radius (RM) Unmatched .115 174.270 .000 16.300 13.700
Matched .139 22.260 .724 8.100 7.000
Media message Nearest neighbour (NNM Unmatched .135 583.05 .000 16.400 9.700
Matched .005 17.16 .927 2.500 2.300
Kernel (KM) Unmatched .135 583.05 .000 16.400 9.700
Matched .017 64.59 .211 5.300 5.000
Radius (RM) Unmatched .135 583.05 .000 16.400 9.700
Matched .003 9.76 .999 1.900 1.700
Both mediums Nearest neighbour (NNM) Unmatched .230 239.64 .000 21.900 20.700
Matched .014 5.840 1.000 4.000 2.800
Kernel (KM) Unmatched .230 239.640 .000 21.900 20.700
Matched .037 14.670 .930 7.200 7.200
Radius (RM) Unmatched .230 239.640 .000 21.900 20.700
Matched .018 7.4000 1.000 4.600 4.500

Source: Authors’ computation based on data from MIC 2016.