Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 11;48(6):1050–1087. doi: 10.1177/0193841X231194565

Table 8.

Knowledge of Malaria and Prevention Measures Taken by Women.

Variables Mother Slept Under Bed Net Child Under 5 Slept Under Bed Net
Rural Urban Non-Poor Poor Total Rural Urban Non-Poor Poor Total
Symptoms of malaria .264*** (.066) .132 (.086) .017 (.078) .170** (.069) .092* (.052) .257*** (.064) .115 (.091) .034 (.084) .172*** (.066) .111** (.053)
 Control variables Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
 Observations 2,000 1,235 1,458 1,777 3,235 1,875 1,154 1,357 1,672 3,029
 Pseudo R2 .053 .064 .18 .164 .102 .053 .064 .185 .176 .102
 Log pseudolikelihood −1170.897 −780.558 −921.372 −1023.417 −1974.569 −1170.897 −780.558 −921.372 −1023.417 −1974.569
 Specification test .145 .775 .874 .422 .750 .145 .775 .874 .422 .750
 Goodness–of–fit test .132 .211 .135 .276 .241 .239 .54 .344 .437 .241
Causes of malaria .017* (.009) .011 (.012) .007 (.010) .014 (.010) .003 (.007) .006** (.009) .012*** (.012) .009** (.011) .004 (.010) .002 (.007)
 Control variables Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
 Observations 2,000 1,235 1,458 1,777 3,235 1,875 1,154 1,357 1,672 3,029
 Pseudo R2 .047 .064 .181 .05 −733.764 .186 .164
 Log pseudolikelihood −1177.439 −781.339 −921.183 −1025.333 −2014.801 −1094.095 .067 −857.72 −957.946 −2014.801
 Specification test .399 .919 .795 .519 .697 .124 .582 .938 .244 .697
 Goodness–of–fit test .113 .127 .287 .176 .211 .1841 .244 .156 .192 .211
Prevention of malaria .022** (.009) .027** (.012) .015 (.010) .024** (.010) .001 (.007) .038*** (.009) .025** (.012) .010 (.011) .038*** (.010) .011 (.007)
 Control variables Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
 Observations 2,000 1,235 1,458 1,777 3,235 1,875 1,154 1,357 1,672 3,029
 Pseudo R2 .048 .066 .182 .163 .101 .052 .069 .186 .167 .101
 Log pseudolikelihood −1176.697 −778.992 −920.106 −1023.667 −1975.967 −1092.489 −732.354 −857.198 −955.385 −1975.967
 Specification test .786 .825 .572 .594 .548 .344 .869 .944 .408 .548
 Goodness–of–fit test .222 .331 .476 .633 .218 .203 .239 .163 .219 .218
Overall knowledge .059*** (.016) .050** (.021) .012 (.019) .046*** (.017) .015** (.012) .062*** (.015) .046** (.022) .011 (.020) .049*** (.016) .020** (.013)
 Control variables Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
 Observations 2,000 1,235 1,458 1,777 3,235 1,875 1,154 1,357 1,672 3,029
 Pseudo R2 .052 .066 .189 .1642 .101 .055 .071 .186 .167 .101
 Log pseudolikelihood −1172.103 −778.951 −920.988 −1022.773 −1975.415 −1088.232 −731.908 −857.769 −955.209 −1975.415
 Specification test 0.3 .813 .683 .532 .732 .187 .595 .997 .268 .732
 Goodness–of–fit test .411 .255 .775 .273 .373 .166 .242 .158 .184 .373

Standard errors in parentheses; ***p < .01, **p < .05, *p < .1. The control variables included in the models for the mother sleeping under bed net are her age, education, ownership of insurance, household poverty status, ethnicity, place of residence (geographical location) and regional location (dummies) of the household. In the child’s models, we included the child’s age, sex and the number of children under age 5 in the household as additional control variables. Source: Authors’ computation based on data from MIC 2016.