ABSTRACT
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a highly problematic opportunistic pathogen that causes a range of different infections. Infections are commonly treated with β-lactam antibiotics, including cephalosporins, monobactams, penicillins, and carbapenems, with carbapenems regarded as antibiotics of last resort. Isolates of P. aeruginosa can contain horizontally acquired bla genes encoding β-lactamase enzymes, but the extent to which these contribute to β-lactam resistance in this species has not been systematically quantified. The overall aim of this research was to address this knowledge gap by quantifying the frequency of β-lactamase-encoding genes in P. aeruginosa and by determining the effects of β-lactamases on susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to β-lactams. Genome analysis showed that β-lactamase-encoding genes are present in 3% of P. aeruginosa but are enriched in carbapenem-resistant isolates (35%). To determine the substrate antibiotics, 10 β-lactamases were expressed from an integrative plasmid in the chromosome of P. aeruginosa reference strain PAO1. The β-lactamases reduced susceptibility to a variety of clinically used antibiotics, including carbapenems (meropenem, imipenem), penicillins (ticarcillin, piperacillin), cephalosporins (ceftazidime, cefepime), and a monobactam (aztreonam). Different enzymes acted on different β-lactams. β-lactamases encoded by the genomes of P. aeruginosa clinical isolates had similar effects to the enzymes expressed in strain PAO1. Genome engineering was used to delete β-lactamase-encoding genes from three carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates and increased susceptibility to substrate β-lactams. Our findings demonstrate that acquired β-lactamases play an important role in β-lactam resistance in P. aeruginosa, identifying substrate antibiotics for a range of enzymes and quantifying their contributions to resistance.
IMPORTANCE
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an extremely problematic pathogen, with isolates that are resistant to the carbapenem class of β-lactam antibiotics being in critical need of new therapies. Genes encoding β-lactamase enzymes that degrade β-lactam antibiotics can be present in P. aeruginosa, including carbapenem-resistant isolates. Here, we show that β-lactamase genes are over-represented in carbapenem-resistant isolates, indicating their key role in resistance. We also show that different β-lactamases alter susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to different β-lactam antibiotics and quantify the effects of selected enzymes on β-lactam susceptibility. This research significantly advances the understanding of the contributions of acquired β-lactamases to antibiotic resistance, including carbapenem resistance, in P. aeruginosa and by implication in other species. It has potential to expedite development of methods that use whole genome sequencing of infecting bacteria to inform antibiotic treatment, allowing more effective use of antibiotics, and facilitate the development of new antibiotics.
KEYWORDS: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, beta-lactamases, carbapenems, carbapenemase, cephalosporins, monobactams, penicillins, horizontal gene transfer, tazobactam, mobile genetic elements
INTRODUCTION
The opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa can cause severe and life-threatening infections in burn wounds, surgical sites, lungs of people with cystic fibrosis, and immunocompromised patients (1–7). β-lactam antibiotics play a key role in the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections (8, 9), with a large variety of β-lactams being used, including the penicillins ticarcillin and piperacillin, the cephalosporins ceftazidime and cefepime, the carbapenems imipenem and meropenem, and the monobactam aztreonam (3, 9, 10). Of particular importance is the carbapenem subclass as they are generally reserved as a last line of defense in the treatment of known or suspected multidrug-resistant bacteria due to their ability to resist hydrolysis by most β-lactamases (11–13). However, treatment is becoming more difficult because of the increasing frequency of β-lactam-resistant isolates (2, 14, 15). Indeed, the World Health Organization has classified carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa as a high-priority group for the development of new treatments (16). Novel β-lactams that inhibit the growth of P. aeruginosa have been developed, but resistance to these can arise in the same way as resistance to currently used antibiotics (17, 18).
There are many mechanisms by which β-lactam-susceptible strains of P. aeruginosa can become resistant. These include mutations that increase expression or alter substrate specificity of multidrug efflux pumps and the intrinsic low-activity β-lactamases AmpC and an OXA-50-like β-lactamase, resulting in increased export and degradation of β-lactams (19–23); mutations in porins responsible for uptake of β-lactams (24–26); mutations in penicillin-binding proteins that are the targets of β-lactam antibiotics; and acquisition of β-lactamases through horizontal gene transfer (27–32). These can be combinatorial, with resistant isolates often having several different mechanisms for reducing susceptibility to β-lactams.
β-lactamases hydrolyze the β-lactam ring of substrate compounds, inactivating the antibiotics (33). These enzymes are categorized into four classes (A to D) based on sequence homology. Enzymes in classes A, C, and D have a catalytic serine for substrate hydrolysis, whereas class B are metallo-enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of β-lactam rings using a metal ion, most commonly a zinc ion (34, 35). Collectively, serine β-lactamases can hydrolyze all β-lactams in clinical use, and metallo-β-lactamases can hydrolyze all clinically used β-lactams except monobactams, although most individual enzymes are only active against a subset of compounds (32, 36, 37). β-lactamases capable of degrading carbapenems (carbapenemases) are especially problematic due to the last-resort role of carbapenems in managing severe infections by multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Carbapenemases can be present in carbapenem-resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa that are often a cause of severe infections (27, 38–41). β-lactamase inhibitors, such as tazobactam, clavulanate, avibactam, vaborbactam, and relebactam, that inhibit some serine β-lactamases can enhance the activity of β-lactam antibiotics by reducing the rate of antibiotic hydrolysis and are often co-administered with β -lactams (42–47).
P. aeruginosa isolates can acquire bla genes that encode β-lactamases through horizontal gene transfer (28–32). The bla genes are typically carried on mobile elements, predominantly chromosomally located composite transposons, although they are on plasmids in some cases (48, 49). Horizontal gene transfer can occur between different species of bacteria, providing the potential for P. aeruginosa to acquire β-lactamases from unrelated species, such as from a variety of Enterobacteriaceae species (50).
Although the substrate antibiotics of some β-lactamases have been determined (31, 51, 52), new enzyme variants are regularly discovered (53–55), and the substrates of most of these are unknown. Consequently, in many cases, it is not known which antibiotics will be effective against a β-lactamase-containing isolate. Furthermore, although many studies have reported the presence of horizontally acquired β-lactamases in P. aeruginosa, there is currently very limited quantitative information on the extent to which these enzymes reduce β-lactam susceptibility in this species. The overall goal of this research was to quantify the effects of acquired β-lactamases on resistance of P. aeruginosa to different β-lactams.
RESULTS
Prevalence of acquired β-lactamases in P. aeruginosa
Determining the frequency of acquired bla genes within the P. aeruginosa population is a first step towards quantifying their contribution to resistance in this species. The genomes of 858 P. aeruginosa isolates with unknown antibiotic resistance phenotypes from the International Pseudomonas Consortium Database (56, 57) were interrogated for the presence of bla genes. The isolates (Table S1) were of worldwide origin (five continents, multiple different countries and centers) and were from a range of different infections and from environmental and veterinary sources. Of the 858 isolates, 26 (3%) had acquired bla genes. These isolates harbored a wide range of acquired genes (Table 1; Table S1). Genes encoding class D enzymes were the most frequent, with OXA-10 being the most prevalent of these (39% of class D enzymes). Class A enzymes were the next most common, with CARB-2 being the most prevalent of these (57%). Class B enzymes were the least frequent, with VIM-2 being the most prevalent (50%). No acquired Class C β-lactamases were found.
TABLE 1.
β-lactamases in uncharacterized and meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates
| Class A | Number of genomes | Class B | Number of genomes | Class D | Number of genomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-lactamases encoded by 858 uncharacterized P. aeruginosa genomes | |||||
| CARB-2 | 8 | IMP-14 | 1 | OXA-2 | 1 |
| VEB-1 | 4 | IMP-54 | 1 | OXA-4 | 1 |
| VEB-2 | 3 | SPM-1 | 2 | OXA-10 | 8 |
| VIM-2 | 4 | OXA-21 | 1 | ||
| OXA-56 | 6 | ||||
| OXA-129 | 1 | ||||
| β-lactamases encoded by genomes of 238 meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa | |||||
| CARB-2 | 4 | IMP-1 | 1 | LCR-1 | 2 |
| GES-1 | 5 | IMP-7 | 1 | OXA-1 | 1 |
| GES-5 | 6 | IMP-31 | 2 | OXA-2 | 13 |
| GES-9 | 1 | VIM-2 | 18 | OXA-4 | 3 |
| GES-19 | 4 | VIM-4 | 3 | OXA-10 | 8 |
| GES-20 | 3 | VIM-47 | 4 | OXA-17 | 1 |
| KPC-2 | 1 | OXA-35 | 2 | ||
| PER-1 | 1 | OXA-36 | 1 | ||
| SHV-12 | 2 | OXA-74 | 1 | ||
| VEB-1 | 4 | OXA-233 | 1 | ||
We next investigated whether bla genes are enriched in isolates of P. aeruginosa that are resistant to meropenem, a carbapenem antibiotic. The frequency of acquired β-lactamases was determined in 238 independent meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates in our collection (clinical isolates of worldwide origin) and from a previous study (clinical isolates from hospitals in Europe) (58) (Table 1; Table S2). Sixty-one of these isolates (35%) had acquired one bla gene and 23 had acquired multiple genes (Table S2), indicating a strong selection for β-lactamases in carbapenem-resistant isolates. The most common β-lactamases found in carbapenem-resistant isolates for each class were GES-5 for class A, VIM-2 for class B, and OXA-2 for class D, all of which have activity against carbapenems, including meropenem. Meropenem resistance is multi-factorial, and other factors, such as absence of OprD or increased expression of efflux pumps, may also contribute to the meropenem-resistant phenotype of these isolates.
The presence of different bla genes in different isolates implies multiple independent acquisitions of bla genes into P. aeruginosa, although the presence of identical bla genes in some cases suggested the possible occurrence of multiple independent isolates of a clonal strain. A phylogenetic tree was therefore constructed with genomes of 64 representative P. aeruginosa isolates from five different continents and including 20 carbapenem-resistant isolates, 21 susceptible isolates, and 23 isolates of unknown phenotype (Fig. 1). An extended phylogenetic tree with all isolates containing acquired β-lactamase was also constructed (Fig. S1).
Fig 1.
Phylogenetic tree of representative β-lactamase containing P. aeruginosa isolates. The tree comprises 37 isolates with acquired β-lactamases and 27 isolates with no acquired β-lactamases (Table S3). The identities of the β-lactamases are shown. Meropenem-resistant isolates are shown in red, meropenem-susceptible isolates in green, and isolates with unknown phenotype in black. Five P. aeruginosa reference strains (in blue) are also included (59). Sequence types (ST) are shown.
The genomes (Fig. 1; Fig. S1) have a similar distribution to a larger tree that represents the breadth of the P. aeruginosa species (60), showing that it encompasses most of the genetic diversity of the P. aeruginosa species, except for the absence of isolates related to the PA7 subgroup. Acquired β-lactamases were present in a wide distribution of carbapenem-resistant isolates and isolates of unknown phenotype (Fig. 1; Fig. S1). The P. aeruginosa isolates have a few groups of closely related strains harboring the same β-lactamases (Fig. 1; Fig. S1), indicating that these clones are highly successful. Notably, there are multiple isolates of the highly virulent clone ST235 (61–63), and these isolates have acquired a range of β-lactamases. There are also multiple isolates of other high-risk clones, including ST111 (61, 63) and ST277 (61, 64–66).
Substrate specificities of β-lactamases
Substrate antibiotics were determined for a range of β-lactamases to better understand the contributions of different enzymes to resistance. Genes encoding β-lactamases from P. aeruginosa isolates were cloned and expressed in P. aeruginosa PAO1, and the effects on MICs of representative antibiotics from all β-lactam classes were measured (Table 2). The β-lactamases chosen that were prevalent in clinical isolates (VIM-2, OXA-10) (Table 1) had not been investigated previously (OXA-21, OXA-129, and the OXA-2-related OXA-226) and/or in β-lactamase families associated with carbapenem resistance (KPC-2, GES-19, GES-20, VIM-2, SPM-1. and IMP-54) (13, 42, 67). Most bla genes are present in the chromosome or on a low copy number of plasmids (27), and so a chromosome-integrating vector (pSW196) was used to represent the normal situation. MIC testing was performed on P. aeruginosa PAO1 expressing the β-lactamases (Table 2).
TABLE 2.
MICs of P. aeruginosa PAO1 expressing bla genesc
| Expressed β-lactamase | Antibiotic MICs mg/La | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbapenems | Penicillins | Cephalosporins | Monobactam | |||||
| MEM | IMI | CARB | PIP | TIC | CTZ | CPM | AZT | |
| Noneb | 0.5 | 2 | 16 | 2 | 8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2 |
| Empty vector | 0.5 | 2 | 16 | 2 | 8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2 |
| Class A | ||||||||
| KPC-2 | 8 | 4 | 512 | 16 | 128 | 4 | 16 | 32 |
| GES-19 | 2 | 2 | 512 | 16 | 256 | 512 | 64 | 64 |
| GES-20 | 16 | 2 | 128 | 16 | 32 | 8 | 2 | 2 |
| Class B | ||||||||
| VIM-2 | 16 | 16 | >1024 | 16 | 512 | 16 | 8 | 2 |
| SPM-1 | 32 | 8 | 128 | 8 | 32 | 256 | 128 | 2 |
| IMP-54 | 32 | 4 | 32 | 2 | 16 | 64 | 64 | 2 |
| Class D | ||||||||
| OXA-226 | 0.5 | 2 | 32 | 2 | 32 | 16 | 1 | 8 |
| OXA-10 | 0.5 | 1 | 128 | 8 | 64 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 |
| OXA-129 | 0.5 | 1 | 32 | 4 | 32 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 |
| OXA-21 | 1 | 1 | 256 | 8 | 128 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Median of three replicates, with all replicate values in Table S4.
None, strain PAO1; empty vector, PAO1 containing pSW196 vector with no cloned bla gene.
MEM = Meropenem, IMI = Imipenem, PIP = Piperacillin, TIC = Ticarcillin, CTZ = ceftazidime, CPM = cefepime, AZT =Aztreonam, CARB = Carbenicillin.
The 10 β-lactamases all increased the MIC for antibiotics in at least one class of β-lactams, with the spectrum of substrates and the extent of the increase differing between enzymes. The three class A β-lactamases (KPC-2, GES-19, and GES-20) and three class B enzymes (VIM-2, SPM-1, and IMP-54) all increased the MICs for at least six of eight β-lactams tested, with KPC-2 increasing the MIC of all β-lactams. Class B β-lactamases did not increase aztreonam MIC, but some enzymes in classes A and D did. Classes A and B enzymes had carbapenemase activity, increasing the MIC for at least one carbapenem, whereas the four class D β-lactamases had little or no carbapenemase activity.
MICs for β-lactamase-containing isolates
The MICs of P. aeruginosa containing a variety of acquired bla genes were determined for comparison with strain PAO1 expressing the same genes (Table 3).
TABLE 3.
MICs of isolates with acquired β-lactamases
| Isolate | Acquired β-lactamase | Antibiotic MICs mg/La | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbapenems | Penicillins | Cephalosporins | Monobactam | ||||||
| MEM | IMI | CARB | PIP | TIC | CTZ | CPM | AZT | ||
| PA01 | None | 0.5 | 2 | 16 | 2 | 8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2 |
| Class A | |||||||||
| 1255885 | KPC-2 | 1024 | 256 | >2048 | 256 | 2048 | 64 | 256 | 512 |
| Class D | |||||||||
| 1257147 | OXA-1/17/129 | 8 | 1 | 1024 | 128 | 512 | 4 | 64 | 16 |
| 1260715 | OXA-10 | 16 | 8 | 256 | 16 | 128 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 1586981 | OXA-2 | 32 | 16 | 1024 | 128 | 256 | 64 | 16 | 32 |
| 1607533 | OXA-2 | 8 | 16 | 128 | 16 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| AUS106 | OXA-21 | 16 | 8 | 512 | 64 | 256 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Classes A and D | |||||||||
| 1275655 | OXA-2, GES-19/19/20 | 128 | 32 | >2048 | 128 | 1024 | 2048 | 256 | 256 |
| 1324459 | OXA-10/233 VEB-1 | 64 | 16 | 2048 | 32 | 1024 | 1024 | 256 | 1024 |
| 1420275 | OXA-2, GES-19/20 | 256 | 34 | 512 | 128 | 256 | 2048 | 256 | 128 |
| 1690076 | OXA-2, GES-19/20 | 16 | 8 | 1024 | 32 | 256 | 256 | 64 | 32 |
| Classes B and D | |||||||||
| 1260990 | OXA-10, VIM-2 | 128 | 128 | >2048 | 64 | 2048 | 16 | 16 | 8 |
| 172BR | SPM-1, OXA-56 | 256 | 128 | 1024 | 32 | 128 | 256 | 128 | 16 |
| 4068 | OXA-10, IMP-54 | >2048 | 256 | >2048 | 128 | >2048 | 512 | 2048 | 128 |
Median of three replicates, with all replicate values shown in Table S5. Values at or above the threshold for resistance (68) are shown in bold font.
Most bla-containing isolates had higher MICs than reference strain P. aeruginosa PAO1 for all β-lactams tested (Tables 2 and 3). However, the results were consistent with the effects of cloned bla genes expressed in strain PAO1. All P. aeruginosa strains with a β-lactamase that increased carbapenem MIC in strain PAO1 (Table 2) were resistant to both carbapenems meropenem and imipenem (Table 3). Class B and D enzymes had little or no effect on the MIC for aztreonam in strain PAO1, and four isolates that were susceptible to aztreonam had only class B and/or D β-lactamases. All the clinical isolates that were susceptible to cephalosporins had only class D β-lactamases, which showed little to no activity against cephalosporins in strain PAO1 (Table 2).
Deletion of carbapenemase genes from clinical isolates
In order to quantify the contributions of carbapenemases to resistance, genes encoding three carbapenemases VIM-2, GES-20 and IMP-54 were deleted from the genomes of P. aeruginosa isolates. These genes were selected for deletion because they conferred the highest increases in meropenem MIC when expressed in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (Table 2), because carbapenems are “last-resort” antibiotics in treatment of P. aeruginosa infections, and because complete genome sequences necessary for engineering the deletions were available. The genes encoding GES-19 and GES-20 are adjacent to each other and flanked by repetitive DNA sequences, making it necessary for technical reasons to delete blaGES19 as well as blaGES20. MIC testing was performed on the engineered deletion-containing mutants (Table 4).
TABLE 4.
MICs of β-lactams for P. aeruginosa isolates with deletions of acquired carbapenemase genes
| Isolate | Antibiotic MICs mg/La | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbapenems | Penicillins | Cephalosporins | Monobactam | |||||
| MEM | IMI | CARB | PIP | TIC | CTZ | CPM | AZT | |
| PA01 | 0.5 | 2 | 16 | 2 | 8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2 |
| 1260990 | 128 | 128 | 2048 | 64 | 1024 | 16 | 16 | 8 |
| 1260990 ΔVIM-2 | 16 | 16 | 512 | 32 | 256 | 2 | 8 | 8 |
| 1420275 | 256 | 32 | >2048 | 128 | 1024 | 2048 | 256 | 128 |
| 1420275 ΔGES-19/20 | 16 | 8 | 256 | 8 | 64 | 4 | 8 | 32 |
| 4068 | >2048 | 256 | >2048 | 128 | >2048 | 512 | 2048 | 128 |
| 4068ΔIMP-54 | 256 | 8 | >2048 | 128 | 2048 | 4 | 64 | 64 |
Median of three replicates, all replicates are in Table S6. Values at or above the threshold for resistance (68) are shown in bold font.
Deletion of the blaVIM-2 gene from the genome of isolate 1260990 reduced the MIC for all antibiotics except aztreonam, consistent with the effect of this gene on strain PAO1 (Table 2), although the bacteria remained resistant to carbapenems and ticarcillin. Deletion of the blaGES-19 and blaGES-20 genes from the genome of isolate 1420275 reduced the MIC of all antibiotics tested, making the bacteria susceptible to penicillins, cephalosporins, and aztreonam and consistent with the activity of class A enzymes against all classes of β-lactams. Deletion of the blaIMP-54 gene from isolate 172BR also reduced the MICs of all β-lactams although only rendered the isolate susceptible to ceftazidime. Overall, none of the gene deletions were sufficient to render the isolates carbapenem-susceptible, but all three deletions reduced carbapenem MIC. The decreases in MICs caused by deleting bla genes are consistent with the increases in MICs that the β-lactamases provide when expressed in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (Table 2). All three of these isolates had deletions or other mutations that inactivate OprD, the porin that is responsible for uptake of carbapenems, and the absence of functional OprD may explain their resistance to carbapenems despite the absence of the bla genes (69, 70).
Effectiveness of tazobactam on P. aeruginosa containing acquired β-lactamase genes
The β-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam is commonly co-administered with β-lactams to restore their function against β-lactamase-containing isolates (71, 72). To investigate the effectiveness of tazobactam against P. aeruginosa containing acquired β-lactamases, antibiotic MICs were determined for a P. aeruginosa PAO1 mutant that has a deletion of ampC. This mutant was used to avoid any confounding effects of the intrinsic β-lactamase AmpC, as inhibition of AmpC by tazobactam might affect the MICs. β-lactams that had a higher MIC in the presence of one or more β-lactamases (Table 2) were tested (Table 5).
TABLE 5.
Effect of tazobactam on P. aeruginosa PAO1 ampC expressing acquired β-lactamases
| Antibiotic MICs mg/La | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-lactamase | MEM | MEM+TZb | β-lactamase | CPM | CPM + TZ | β-lactamase | TIC | TIC+TZ | β-lactamase | CTZ | CTZ+TZ |
| Nonec | 0.5 | 0.5 | None | 1 | 1 | NA | 8 | 8 | None | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| GES-20 | 16 | 16 | KPC-2 | 16 | 16 | OXA-10 | 64 | 64 | OXA-226 | 16 | 8 |
| VIM-2 | 16 | 16 | GES-19 | 64 | 64 | OXA-129 | 32 | 32 | |||
| SPM-1 | 128 | 128 | OXA-21 | 128 | 16 | ||||||
| IMP-54 | 64 | 64 | OXA-226 | 32 | 16 | ||||||
Median of three replicates, all replicates are in Table S7. MICs that were lower in the presence of tazobactam are indicated in bold font.
TZ = Tazobactam.
None, PAO1ΔampC.
Tazobactam had activity against two class D β-lactamases, OXA-21 and to a lesser extent OXA-226. Class A enzymes (KPC-2 and GES19/20) were not inhibited by tazobactam, consistent with previous findings for KPC-2 (47, 73). Class B β-lactamases (metallo-β-lactamase, VIM-2, IMP-54, and SPM-1) were also not inhibited by tazobactam, which is known to lack activity against class B enzymes (33).
bla genes are parts of complex mobile genetic elements
Mobile genetic elements allow for the spread of β-lactamase-encoding genes and a large range of other antibiotic-resistance genes (27, 74). The mobile elements that contained β-lactamases were investigated for carbapenem-resistant isolates for which complete (fully assembled) genome sequences were available to determine how the β-lactamases were likely acquired and spread. Genes encoding VIM-2 and OXA-10 (Fig. S2a), and GES-19, GES-20, and OXA-2 (Fig. S2b) are on transposons in the chromosomes of the isolates 1260990 and 1420275, respectively. The blaKPC-2 gene present in isolate 1255885 is encoded by a large plasmid (44 kb), named in this study as pPAE1255885 (Fig. S2c).
The transposon-located resistance genes were predominantly found in non-Pseudomonas species, in particular members of the Enterobacteriaceae. These included members of the Aeromonas, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, and Raoultella genera, indicating that these transposons or the genes on them have likely been acquired by P. aeruginosa from other species. The transposons contained multiple genes for resistance to other compounds, notably aminoglycoside antibiotics and also mercury and sulfonamide (Fig. S2).
The blaKPC-2 gene is part of a plasmid pPAE1255885 (Fig. S2c) that is very similar to plasmids pPA2047 and pPae-13 (75, 76), as well as plasmids pPA-1 and pPA-2 (BioSamples; SAMN28550649 and SAMN28550875, respectively). The main differences are multiple rearrangement/duplication events, although pPae-13 lacks a transposon present in the other plasmids. Plasmid pPAE1255885 was transformed into P. aeruginosa PAO1, and MIC testing was carried out (Table 6). The MIC for P. aeruginosa PAO1 containing the KPC-2-encoding pPAE1255885 was significantly higher for all antibiotics tested than for P. aeruginosa expressing KPC-2 from the chromosomally integrated vector. The difference in MIC may be due to an uncharacterized antibiotic resistance mechanism on pPAE1255885, or to the multi-copy nature of pPAE1255885, compared with the chromosomally expressed KPC-2 gene. Isolate 1255885 that contains pPAE1255885 had similar MIC values to strain PAO1 harboring the same plasmid (Table 6). This indicates that the majority of the β-lactam resistance in 1255885 is due to the plasmid.
TABLE 6.
Effect of plasmid pPAE1255885 on the MICs of P. aeruginosa PAO1
| Strain | Antibiotic MICs mg/La | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbapenems | Penicillins | Cephalosporins | Monobactam | |||||
| MEM | IMI | CARB | PIP | TIC | CTZ | CPM | AZT | |
| PAO1 | 0.5 | 2 | 16 | 2 | 8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2 |
| PAO1 +KPC-2 | 8 | 4 | 512 | 16 | 128 | 4 | 16 | 32 |
| PAO1 +pPAE1255885 | 256 | 128 | >2048 | 256 | 2048 | 32 | 128 | 512 |
| 1255885 | 1024 | 256 | >2048 | 256 | 2048 | 64 | 256 | 512 |
Median of three replicates, all replicate values are in Table S8.
DISCUSSION
The overall aim of this research was to quantify the contribution of acquired β-lactamases to the resistance of P. aeruginosa to β-lactam antibiotics, with a particular focus on carbapenems and carbapenemases. Our findings show that acquired bla genes are enriched in carbapenem-resistant isolates. Classes A and B enzymes, although not class D, had carbapenemase activity in P. aeruginosa. Deletion of bla genes from clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa increased susceptibility to multiple β-lactams, including carbapenems and allowed quantification of the effects of the corresponding β-lactamases on MIC. Tazobactam had limited activity against the enzymes characterized in this study.
Quantification of the effects of acquired bla genes can contribute to ongoing efforts to predict antibiotic susceptibility of P. aeruginosa from genome sequences (77, 78). Knowledge of the substrate specificities of different β-lactamases will also facilitate the application of artificial intelligence for development of new antibiotics and inhibitors (79, 80).
Although the effects of some of the enzymes tested here (KPC-2, GES-19, and VIM-2) had been assessed previously in E. coli for a subset of the antibiotics used here (51, 81–83), only SPM-1 and OXA-10 had previously been investigated for their effects in a P. aeruginosa reference strain (84, 85). So far, the remaining enzymes GES-20, IMP-54, OXA-21, OXA-129, and OXA-226, had not been characterized for any species. Substrates of β-lactamases were identified by expressing bla genes from an integrative vector that mimics the acquisition of genes into the chromosome of P. aeruginosa by integrative mobile genetic elements. This approach enabled an efficient survey of the effects of acquired β-lactamases of different classes on P. aeruginosa. Class A β-lactamases collectively increased the MICs of all tested β-lactams, although only KPC-2 increased MICs towards all β-lactams (Table 2). KPC-2 increases the MIC of imipenem, piperacillin, and ceftazidime when expressed in E. coli (82, 83), consistent with the results of this study. Although GES-19 and GES-20 are only two amino acid residues different in sequence, they had significantly different effects on β-lactam susceptibility, with GES-19 increasing the MIC of penicillins, cephalosporins, and monobactams, and GES-20, that of meropenem (Table 2). Consistent with these results, deletion of both GES-19 and GES-20 genes from a clinical isolate reduced the MIC of all β-lactams tested (Table 4). Intriguingly, deletion of both GES-19 and GES-20 reduced the MIC for imipenem, whereas expression of the individual genes did not increase the MIC of reference strain PAO1 (Table 2). The effect of co-expression of both GES-19 and GES-20 genes in strain PAO1 remains to be determined.
Class B β-lactamases increased the MIC of all β-lactams tested except for the monobactam aztreonam (Tables 2 and 4). These findings are consistent with previous findings in E. coli (32, 34, 37), as well as the known lack of activity of class B β-lactamases against monobactams (32), and suggest that aztreonam could be used to treat clinical isolates with only class B β-lactamases. The activity of Class D β-lactamases was largely limited to penicillins and cephalosporins, except for OXA-226 that increased the MICs for ceftazidime and aztreonam MICs. For example, OXA-10 increased piperacillin, ticarcillin, cefepime, and aztreonam MIC when expressed in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (Table 2), consistent with an earlier study (85).
The β-lactamase inhibitor tested here, tazobactam, is commonly co-administered with β-lactams and has been reported to inhibit many class A and some class C and D β-lactamases, although not KPC β-lactamases (47, 73, 86–88). Tazobactam inhibits GES-2 that has a very similar sequence (two or three amino acids different) to both GES-19 and GES-20 (88) but did not affect the MIC of P. aeruginosa PAO1 expressing GES-19 or GES-20 (Table 5) indicating that the differences between enzymes are sufficient to make GES-19 and GES-20 resistant to tazobactam. Instead, tazobactam only showed activity against the class D β-lactamases OXA-21 and OXA-226 (Table 5). Tazobactam also has activity against OXA-2 (47) that is very similar to OXA-226 and relatively closely related to OXA-21. These findings indicate that tazobactam likely has activity against other class D β-lactamases closely related to OXA-2 but has variable effects on class A enzymes. Other β-lactamase inhibitors, such as avibactam and relebactam, are effective against class A β-lactamases (89, 90). It will be of importance to investigate the activities of a range of β-lactamase inhibitors against enzymes expressed in strain PAO1 to enable comparison with direct enzymatic assays (86, 91). Relating this information to the frequencies at which different β-lactamases are present in P. aeruginosa may allow fine-tuning of antibiotic/inhibitor combinations in treating P. aeruginosa infections.
Although acquired bla genes are at a low but significant level (3%) in the P. aeruginosa population, they are enriched in carbapenem-resistant isolates (35% of isolates), indicating their importance to resistance. It should be noted that most currently available bacterial genome sequences, including almost all of those analyxed here, are assembled from short read-data that leads to poor assembly of mobile elements (92, 93), and so the frequency of bla genes could be significantly underestimated in both carbapenem-resistant and carbapenem-susceptible sub-populations of P. aeruginosa. Knowing the distribution and frequency of acquired β-lactamases in the P. aeruginosa population, and in other bacteria, can contribute to development of approaches to manage the spread of the threat.
Most clinical isolates harboring bla genes had higher MICs than P. aeruginosa PAO1 expressing individual genes (Tables 2 and 3). For example, unlike strain PAO1 all five isolates with a class A β-lactamase were clinically resistant towards all β-lactams (Table 3), except that one isolate had only intermediate resistance towards piperacillin. The higher MICs relative to strain PAO1 expressing individual bla genes could be due in part to the presence of multiple bla genes in many of the isolates. About a quarter (24.5%) of isolates that have class B β-lactamases also have either a class A or D β-lactamase, and over half (54%) of isolates with a class D enzyme also have other acquired β-lactamases (Table 3; Tables S1 and S2). However, the higher MICs of the clinical isolates could also be due to the presence of mutations affecting antibiotic efflux or uptake, or mutations in penicillin-binding proteins. For example, mutations inactivating OprD explain the finding that deletion of bla genes encoding enzymes with carbapenemase activity (GES-20, VIM-2 and IMP-54) reduced MICs of carbapenems and other β-lactams, it did not render the bacteria carbapenem-susceptible (Table 4). The relative sensitivity of strain PAO1 to β-lactams means that MICs of this strain expressing individual β-lactamases can likely be used to indicate the minimum MICs of different antibiotics for clinical isolates with the same β-lactamases. bla-containing isolates and carbapenem-resistant isolates encompass a large range of the genetic diversity of the P. aeruginosa species. This indicates that bla genes have been acquired by P. aeruginosa on multiple occasions, and that most if not all P. aeruginosa isolates are capable of acquiring bla genes and becoming carbapenem-resistant. Notably, high-risk clones, such as ST235, that are associated with poorer patient outcomes following infection (61–63) have acquired a range of different bla genes. The genes encoding VIM-2 and OXA-10 are co-located on a transposon in the chromosome, as well as those encoding GES-19, GES-20, and OXA-2. Almost identical transposons were identified in a wide range of Gram-negative genera, indicating that the transposons have likely been acquired by P. aeruginosa from other species. The presence of bla genes on mobile genetic elements that frequently contain multiple resistance genes provides opportunities to acquire multiple bla genes simultaneously. A significant proportion of bla-containing isolates (28%) had multiple bla genes. The GES-19 and GES-20 genes are adjacent to one another in all three clinical isolates that contain them (Table 3; Table S2; Fig. S1b) and are often reported together in literature (94, 95). The presence of multiple different bla genes on the same element indicates that combinations are selected most likely due to additive or synergistic effects of different enzymes in conferring resistance to a wider range of antibiotics. The transposons also carry genes for resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics, emphasizing how multiple antibiotic resistance genes can be acquired in a single genetic event.
The blaKPC-2 gene is located on a plasmid, pPAE1255885 (Fig. S2). Strain PAO1 containing this plasmid had very similar MIC values to the clinical isolate containing the same plasmid (Table 6), indicating that the plasmid may be responsible for the majority of β-lactam resistance in this isolate. The plasmid resulted in significantly higher MICs for strain PAO1 than KPC-2 expressed alone (Tables 2 and 6), although KPC-2 is the only gene on pPAE1255885 known to contribute directly to antibiotic resistance. The difference may be due to increased expression of KPC-2 from the multi-copy plasmid or may indicate the presence of an uncharacterized mechanism of β-lactam resistance on pPAE1255885. Collectively, these examples emphasize how mobile elements can carry a diverse range of β-lactamases and other antibiotic resistance genes. Many mobile elements are poorly characterized, and their prevalence in bacterial populations is not well understood. However, understanding and reducing the spread of mobile elements will likely be important in combating antibiotic resistance.
In conclusion, acquired β-lactamases contribute towards resistance to a large range of β-lactams in P. aeruginosa. Different β-lactamases of both the same and different classes have differences in their target β-lactams and also the extent of their effect on MIC. β-lactamases likely play a significant role in carbapenem resistance as they are highly enriched in carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. Because many of the β-lactamases studied here are present in a wide range of bacterial species (54), determining their activities has potential to inform decisions on antibiotic treatment of infections by other bacterial species nd P. aeruginosa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacteria and growth conditions
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S9. Bacteria were grown at 37 ◦C in Lysogeny broth (LB) with shaking (200 rpm) or on Luria agar (LA) unless stated otherwise, with additional chemicals added as required. Gentamicin (E. coli, 20 µg/mL; P. aeruginosa, 30 mg/L) was used to select for bacteria containing plasmid pJN105 tetracycline (E. coli, 12.5 mg/L; P. aeruginosa, 25 mg/L) for bacteria containing plasmid pEX18Tc or pSW196 and meropenem (2 mg/L) for P. aeruginosa strain PAO1 containing plasmid pPAE1255885. For conjugation, ST18 was used as a donor strain and grown in media supplemented with δ-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) (50 mg/L), and P. aeruginosa recipients were grown at 42°C in LB with 0.4% KNO3 as described previously (96–98). For expression of cloned genes from plasmid pSW196, arabinose (5 mg/mL) was included in the growth medium.
Molecular biology methods
Genomic DNA was purified using the UltraClean Microbial Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), plasmids were purified using the NucleoSpin Plasmid kit (Macherey Nagel, Dueren, Germany), and PCR products were purified and extracted from agarose gels using the NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up kit (Macherey Nagel, Dueren, Germany) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. For DNA cloning, PCR amplification was carried out with genomic DNA from isolates listed in Table S9 as template and with appropriate primers (Table S10). Amplicons for expression of the bla genes included the predicted ribosome-binding sites. Amplicons were cloned into pSW196 (99) for expression of cloned genes in P. aeruginosa. DNA cloning was carried out using restriction enzymes and T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). DNA sequencing (Genetics Analysis Service, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand) was carried out with appropriate primers on all plasmid constructs to confirm that the intended plasmids had been obtained with no mutations.
Genetic manipulation
bla genes that had been cloned into pSW196 were transferred into the chromosome of the β-lactam-susceptible reference strain PAO1 by conjugation (97). Plasmid pPAE1255885 was transformed into P. aeruginosa PAO1 that had been made competent by the sucrose washing method (100). bla and ampC genes were deleted from the genomes of P. aeruginosa isolates using two-step allelic exchange as previously described (96–98). In brief, PCR amplification with appropriate primers (Table S10) was used to amplify ∼1-kb fragments flanking the gene(s) to be deleted, using genomic DNA from the relevant isolate as template. The PCR fragments were cloned adjacently into pEX18Tc (101). Plasmid pEX18Tc containing the two cloned fragments was transferred into the chromosome of recipient strains by conjugation from E. coli ST18, followed by homologous recombination. Mutants in which the engineered deletion alleles had replaced the wild-type DNA were identified by sucrose selection, followed by PCR amplification and sequencing using primers diagnostic for the presence of the deletion.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing
Overnight cultures of P. aeruginosa were diluted to 1.5 × 106 CFU/mL and two 5-µL aliquots were spotted onto LA plates supplemented with doubling concentrations of antibiotic (102, 103), and, if required, arabinose to induce expression of cloned genes. Tazobactam was used at a set concentration of 4 µg/mL. Agar plates were incubated for 24 h, and the antibiotic MIC was defined as the lowest concentration that inhibited growth. CLSI breakpoints were utilized to classify resistant and susceptible phenotypes (68). Meropenem and imipenem have resistance breakpoints of 8 mg/L, aztreonam, ceftazidime, and cefepime of 32 mg/L, piperacillin of 64 mg/L, and ticarcillin of 128 mg/L. CLSI does not have thresholds for carbenicillin, which is not used clinically.
Bioinformatic analysis
Genome sequences were determined by the International Pseudomonas Consortium Database (IPCD) (56, 57), by Khaledi et al. (58), and for isolates in our laboratory collection (96). Genome sequences were from isolates from five continents and included isolates from a range of human infections and from environmental and animal sources (Tables S1 to S3). ResFinder V 4.0 was used to identify acquired antibacterial resistance genes from draft genome sequences (104). The identified acquired resistance genes were verified using the CARD BLAST (https://card.mcmaster.ca/) (105). For genomes with complete fully assembled sequences, mobile genetic elements, the genes present on them and the boundaries of transposons were identified with TnCentral BLAST (106) and NCBI BLAST (107). For phylogenetic analysis, ParSNP version 1.2 from the Harvest suite 1.1.2 was used to construct a core genome alignment of isolates with P. aeruginosa PAO1 as the reference strain (108, 109). The phylogenetic trees were visualized on TreeGraph 2 (110). The MLST type was determined using FastMLST (https://github.com/EnzoAndree/FastMLST) (111).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We very gratefully acknowledge Roger Levesque, Bob Hancock, Craig Winstanley, and co-workers for generously providing isolates used in this study and for generating many of the genome sequences.
K.A.G. was supported by a postgraduate scholarship from the University of Otago. Additional research funding was provided by the University of Otago. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
K.A.G.: Project design, investigation, data collection, data analysis, writing the original draft, reviewing, and editing of the manuscript. I.L.L.: Project design, project administration, supervision, reviewing, and editing of the manuscript.
Both authors read and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Iain L. Lamont, Email: iain.lamont@otago.ac.nz.
Pablo Power, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Daniela Cejas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00694-24.
Figure S1: Extended phylogenetic tree. Figure S2: Maps of acquired genetic elements.
Supplemental tables detailing genomes analyzed, MIC replicate data, and methods-related materials.
An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Hilliam Y, Kaye S, Winstanley C. 2020. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and microbial keratitis. J Med Microbiol 69:3–13. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Nathwani D, Raman G, Sulham K, Gavaghan M, Menon V. 2014. Clinical and economic consequences of hospital-acquired resistant and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 3:32. doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-3-32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bassetti M, Vena A, Croxatto A, Righi E, Guery B. 2018. How to manage Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Drugs Context 7:1–18. doi: 10.7573/dic.212527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bassetti M, Vena A, Russo A, Croxatto A, Calandra T, Guery B. 2018. Rational approach in the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis 31:578–586. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sievert DM, Ricks P, Edwards JR, Schneider A, Patel J, Srinivasan A, Kallen A, Limbago B, Fridkin S, National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Team and Participating NHSN Facilities . 2013. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections summary of data reported to the national healthcare safety network at the centers for disease control and prevention, 2009–2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34:1–14. doi: 10.1086/668770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Church D, Elsayed S, Reid O, Winston B, Lindsay R. 2006. Burn wound infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 19:403–434. doi: 10.1128/CMR.19.2.403-434.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Williams FN, Herndon DN, Hawkins HK, Lee JO, Cox RA, Kulp GA, Finnerty CC, Chinkes DL, Jeschke MG. 2009. The leading causes of death after burn injury in a single pediatric burn center. Crit Care 13:R183. doi: 10.1186/cc8170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Glen KA, Lamont IL. 2021. β-lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: current status, future prospects. Pathogens 10:1638. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10121638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Talwalkar JS, Murray TS. 2016. The approach to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis. Clin Chest Med 37:69–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2015.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Horcajada JP, Montero M, Oliver A, Sorlí L, Luque S, Gómez-Zorrilla S, Benito N, Grau S. 2019. Epidemiology and treatment of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 32:e00031-19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00031-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Papp-Wallace KM, Endimiani A, Taracila MA, Bonomo RA. 2011. Carbapenems: past, present, and future. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:4943–4960. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00296-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. El-Gamal MI, Brahim I, Hisham N, Aladdin R, Mohammed H, Bahaaeldin A. 2017. Recent updates of carbapenem antibiotics. Eur J Med Chem 131:185–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.03.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Meletis G. 2016. Carbapenem resistance: overview of the problem and future perspectives. Ther Adv Infect Dis 3:15–21. doi: 10.1177/2049936115621709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Matos E de, Andriolo RB, Rodrigues YC, Lima P de, Carneiro I do R, Lima KVB. 2018. Mortality in patients with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a meta-analysis. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 51:415–420. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0506-2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bonyadi P, Saleh NT, Dehghani M, Yamini M, Amini K. 2022. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb Pathog 165:105461. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Sati H, Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Unit WHO, Ag WHO, Zignol M, Cameron A. 2024. WHO bacterial priority pathogens list, 2024
- 17. Ferous S, Anastassopoulou C, Pitiriga V, Vrioni G, Tsakris A. 2024. Antimicrobial and diagnostic stewardship of the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors for infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibiotics (Basel) 13:285. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13030285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chaïbi K, Jaureguy F, Do Rego H, Ruiz P, Mory C, El Helali N, Mrabet S, Mizrahi A, Zahar J-R, Pilmis B. 2023. What to do with the new antibiotics? Antibiotics (Basel) 12:654. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12040654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Masuda N, Sakagawa E, Ohya S, Gotoh N, Tsujimoto H, Nishino T. 2000. Substrate specificities of MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-oprM efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:3322–3327. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.12.3322-3327.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Pan Y-P, Xu Y-H, Wang Z-X, Fang Y-P, Shen J-L. 2016. Overexpression of MexAB-OprM efflux pump in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Arch Microbiol 198:565–571. doi: 10.1007/s00203-016-1215-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Lister PD, Wolter DJ, Hanson ND. 2009. Antibacterial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical impact and complex regulation of chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 22:582–610. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00040-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Gomis-Font MA, Pitart C, Del Barrio-Tofiño E, Zboromyrska Y, Cortes-Lara S, Mulet X, Marco F, Vila J, López-Causapé C, Oliver A. 2021. Emergence of resistance to novel cephalosporin-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations through the modification of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa MexCD-OprJ efflux pump. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65:e0008921. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00089-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Fernández-Esgueva M, López-Calleja AI, Mulet X, Fraile-Ribot PA, Cabot G, Huarte R, Rezusta A, Oliver A. 2020. Characterization of AmpC β-lactamase mutations of extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates that develop resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam during therapy. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clín 38:474–478. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2020.01.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kos VN, McLaughlin RE, Gardner HA. 2016. Identification of unique in-frame deletions in OprD among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pathog Dis 74:ftw031. doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftw031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Ochs MM, McCusker MP, Bains M, Hancock REW. 1999. Negative regulation of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane porin OprD selective for imipenem and basic amino acids. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:1085–1090. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.5.1085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Giske CG, Buarø L, Sundsfjord A, Wretlind B. 2008. Alterations of porin, pumps, and penicillin-binding proteins in carbapenem resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microb Drug Resist 14:23–30. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2008.0778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Yoon E-J, Jeong SH. 2021. Mobile carbapenemase genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol 12:30. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.614058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Adam MA, Elhag WI. 2018. Prevalence of metallo-β-lactamase acquired genes among carbapenems susceptible and resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates using multiplex PCR, Khartoum hospitals, Khartoum Sudan. BMC Infect Dis 18:668. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3581-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Watanabe M, Iyobe S, Inoue M, Mitsuhashi S. 1991. Transferable imipenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 35:147–151. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.1.147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Dortet L, Flonta M, Boudehen YM, Creton E, Bernabeu S, Vogel A, Naas T. 2015. Dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Romania. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:7100–7103. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01512-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Evans BA, Amyes SGB. 2014. OXA β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:241–263. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00117-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Queenan AM, Bush K. 2007. Carbapenemases: the versatile β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:440–458. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00001-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Tooke CL, Hinchliffe P, Bragginton EC, Colenso CK, Hirvonen VHA, Takebayashi Y, Spencer J. 2019. β-lactamases and β-lactamase inhibitors in the 21st century. J Mol Biol 431:3472–3500. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Boyd SE, Livermore DM, Hooper DC, Hope WW. 2020. Metallo-β-lactamases: structure, function, epidemiology, treatment options, and the development pipeline. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e00397-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00397-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Bush K, Jacoby GA. 2010. Updated functional classification of β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:969–976. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01009-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Antunes NT, Fisher JF. 2014. Acquired class D β-lactamases. Antibiotics (Basel) 3:398–434. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics3030398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Palzkill T. 2013. Metallo-β-lactamase structure and function. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1277:91–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06796.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Pérez-vázquez M, Sola-campoy PJ, Zurita ÁM, Ávila A, Gómez-bertomeu F, Solís S, López-urrutia L, Gónzalez-barberá EM, Cercenado E, Bautista V, Lara N, Aracil B, Oliver A, Campos J, Oteo-iglesias J. 2020. Carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Spain: interregional dissemination of the high-risk clones ST175 and ST244 carrying blaVIM-2, blaVIM-1, blaIMP-8, blaVIM-20 and blaKPC-2. Int J Antimicrob Agents 56:106026. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Zhang Y, Chen X-L, Huang A-W, Liu S-L, Liu W-J, Zhang N, Lu X-Z. 2016. Mortality attributable to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Emerg Microbes Infect 5:e27. doi: 10.1038/emi.2016.22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Liu Q, Li X, Li W, Du X, He J-Q, Tao C, Feng Y. 2015. Influence of carbapenem resistance on mortality of patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 5:1–10. doi: 10.1038/srep11715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Balkhair A, Al-Muharrmi Z, Al’Adawi B, Al Busaidi I, Taher HB, Al-Siyabi T, Al Amin M, Hassan KS. 2019. Prevalence and 30-day all-cause mortality of carbapenem-and colistin-resistant bacteraemia caused by Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae: description of a decade-long trend. Int J Infect Dis 85:10–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Hammoudi Halat D, Ayoub Moubareck C. 2020. The current burden of carbapenemases: review of significant properties and dissemination among gram-negative bacteria. Antibiotics (Basel) 9:186. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9040186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Lahiri SD, Johnstone MR, Ross PL, McLaughlin RE, Olivier NB, Alm RA. 2014. Avibactam and class C β-lactamases: mechanism of inhibition, conservation of the binding pocket, and implications for resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:5704–5713. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03057-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Silva MP, Saraiva L, Pinto M, Sousa ME. 2020. Boronic acids and their derivatives in medicinal chemistry: synthesis and biological applications. Molecules 25:4323. doi: 10.3390/molecules25184323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Rodríguez D, Maneiro M, Vázquez-Ucha JC, Beceiro A, González-Bello C. 2020. 6-arylmethylidene penicillin-based sulfone inhibitors for repurposing antibiotic efficiency in priority pathogens. J Med Chem 63:3737–3755. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Drawz SM, Bethel CR, Doppalapudi VR, Sheri A, Pagadala SRR, Hujer AM, Skalweit MJ, Anderson VE, Chen SG, Buynak JD, Bonomo RA. 2010. Penicillin sulfone inhibitors of class D β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:1414–1424. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00743-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Monogue ML, Heil EL, Aitken SL, Pogue JM. 2021. The role of tazobactam-based combinations for the management of infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: insights from the society of infectious diseases pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy 41:864–880. doi: 10.1002/phar.2623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Hussain HI, Aqib AI, Seleem MN, Shabbir MA, Hao H, Iqbal Z, Kulyar MF-E-A, Zaheer T, Li K. 2021. Genetic basis of molecular mechanisms in β-lactam resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Microb Pathog 158:105040. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Cazares A, Moore MP, Hall JPJ, Wright LL, Grimes M, Emond-Rhéault J-G, Pongchaikul P, Santanirand P, Levesque RC, Fothergill JL, Winstanley C. 2020. A megaplasmid family driving dissemination of multidrug resistance in Pseudomonas. Nat Commun 11:1370. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15081-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Lerminiaux NA, Cameron ADS. 2019. Horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in clinical environments. Can J Microbiol 65:34–44. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2018-0275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Barnes MD, Winkler ML, Taracila MA, Page MG, Desarbre E, Kreiswirth BN, Shields RK, Nguyen M-H, Clancy C, Spellberg B, Papp-Wallace KM, Bonomo RA. 2017. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-2 (KPC-2), substitutions at ambler position Asp179, and resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam: unique antibiotic-resistant phenotypes emerge from β-lactamase protein engineering. MBio 8:e00528-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00528-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Martínez-García L, González-Alba JM, Baquero F, Cantón R, Galán JC. 2018. Ceftazidime is the key diversification and selection driver of VIM-type carbapenemases. mBio 9:e02109-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02109-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Bush K. 2012. Evolution of β-lactamases: past, present, and future, p 427–453. In Dougherty TJ, Pucci MJ (ed), Antibiotic discovery and development. Springer US, Boston, MA. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Sawa T, Kooguchi K, Moriyama K. 2020. Molecular diversity of extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases, and antimicrobial resistance. J Intensive Care 8:13. doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-0429-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Meini M-R, Llarrull LI, Vila AJ. 2014. Evolution of metallo-β-lactamases: trends revealed by natural diversity and in vitro evolution. Antibiotics (Basel) 3:285–316. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics3030285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Freschi L, Jeukens J, Kukavica-Ibrulj I, Boyle B, Dupont M-J, Laroche J, Larose S, Maaroufi H, Fothergill JL, Moore M, et al. 2015. Clinical utilization of genomics data produced by the international Pseudomonas aeruginosa consortium. Front Microbiol 6:1036. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Freschi L, Vincent AT, Jeukens J, Emond-Rheault JG, Kukavica-Ibrulj I, Dupont MJ, Charette SJ, Boyle B, Levesque RC. 2019. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa pan-genome provides new insights on its population structure, horizontal gene transfer, and pathogenicity. Genome Biol Evol 11:109–120. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evy259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Khaledi A, Weimann A, Schniederjans M, Asgari E, Kuo T-H, Oliver A, Cabot G, Kola A, Gastmeier P, Hogardt M, Jonas D, Mofrad MR, Bremges A, McHardy AC, Häussler S. 2020. Predicting antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa with machine learning-enabled molecular diagnostics. EMBO Mol Med 12:e10264. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201910264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. De Soyza A, Hall AJ, Mahenthiralingam E, Drevinek P, Kaca W, Drulis-Kawa Z, Stoitsova SR, Toth V, Coenye T, Zlosnik JEA, Burns JL, Sá-Correia I, De Vos D, Pirnay J-P, Kidd TJ, Reid D, Manos J, Klockgether J, Wiehlmann L, Tümmler B, McClean S, Winstanley C. 2013. Developing an international Pseudomonas aeruginosa reference panel. Microbiologyopen 2:1010–1023. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Ozer EA, Nnah E, Didelot X, Whitaker RJ, Hauser AR. 2019. The population structure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is characterized by genetic isolation of exoU+ and exoS+ lineages. Genome Biol Evol 11:1780–1796. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evz119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Silveira MC, Rocha-de-Souza CM, Albano RM, de Oliveira Santos IC, Carvalho-Assef APD. 2020. Exploring the success of Brazilian endemic clone Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST277 and its association with the CRISPR-Cas system type I-C. BMC Genomics 21:255. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6650-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Lee AC, Jones AL. 2018. Multi-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST235 in cystic fibrosis. Paediatr Respir Rev 27:18–20. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2018.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Guzvinec M, Izdebski R, Butic I, Jelic M, Abram M, Koscak I, Baraniak A, Hryniewicz W, Gniadkowski M, Tambic Andrasevic A. 2014. Sequence types 235, 111, and 132 predominate among multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates in Croatia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:6277–6283. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03116-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Dos Santos PAS, Rodrigues YC, Marcon DJ, Lobato ARF, Cazuza TB, Gouveia MIM, Silva MJA, Souza AB, Lima L, Quaresma A, Brasiliense DM, Lima KVB. 2023. Endemic high-risk clone ST277 is related to the spread of SPM-1-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa during the COVID-19 pandemic period in Northern Brazil. Microorganisms 11:2069. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11082069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Martins WMBS, Narciso AC, Cayô R, Santos SV, Fehlberg LCC, Ramos PL, da Cruz JB, Gales AC. 2018. SPM-1-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST277 clone recovered from microbiota of migratory birds. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 90:221–227. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Hopkins KL, Meunier D, Findlay J, Mustafa N, Parsons H, Pike R, Wright L, Woodford N. 2016. SPM-1 metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST277 in the UK. J Med Microbiol 65:696–697. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Walther-Rasmussen J, Høiby N. 2006. OXA-type carbapenemases. J Antimicrob Chemother 57:373–383. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. CLSI . 2018. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 28th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Insitute, Wayne, PA, USA. [Google Scholar]
- 69. Iyer R, Sylvester MA, Velez-Vega C, Tommasi R, Durand-Reville TF, Miller AA. 2017. Whole-cell-based assay to evaluate structure permeation relationships for carbapenem passage through the Pseudomonas aeruginosa porin OprD. ACS Infect Dis 3:310–319. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.6b00197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Li H, Luo Y-F, Williams BJ, Blackwell TS, Xie C-M. 2012. Structure and function of OprD protein in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: from antibiotic resistance to novel therapies. Int J Med Microbiol 302:63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2011.10.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Gallagher JC, Satlin MJ, Elabor A, Saraiya N, McCreary EK, Molnar E, El-Beyrouty C, Jones BM, Dixit D, Heil EL, Claeys KC, Hiles J, Vyas NM, Bland CM, Suh J, Biason K, McCoy D, King MA, Richards L, Harrington N, Guo Y, Chaudhry S, Lu X, Yu D. 2018. Ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a multicenter study. Open Forum Infect Dis 5:fy280. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Gin A, Dilay L, Karlowsky JA, Walkty A, Rubinstein E, Zhanel GG. 2007. Piperacillin-tazobactam: a beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 5:365–383. doi: 10.1586/14787210.5.3.365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Theuretzbacher U, Carrara E, Conti M, Tacconelli E. 2021. Role of new antibiotics for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother 76:i47–i54. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Thacharodi A, Lamont IL. 2022. Aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes are sufficient to make Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinically resistant to key antibiotics. Antibiotics (Basel) 11:884. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11070884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Wozniak A, Figueroa C, Moya-Flores F, Guggiana P, Castillo C, Rivas L, Munita JM, García PC. 2021. A multispecies outbreak of carbapenem-resistant bacteria harboring the blaKPC gene in A non-classical transposon element. BMC Microbiol 21:107. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02169-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Cejas D, Elena A, González-Espinosa FE, Pallecchi L, Vay C, Rossolini GM, Gutkind G, Di Pilato V, Radice M. 2022. Characterisation of blaKPC-2-harbouring plasmids recovered from Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST654 and ST235 high-risk clones. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 29:310–312. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2022.04.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Su M, Satola SW, Read TD. 2019. Genome-based prediction of bacterial antibiotic resistance. J Clin Microbiol 57:e01405-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01405-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Boolchandani M, D’Souza AW, Dantas G. 2019. Sequencing-based methods and resources to study antimicrobial resistance. Nat Rev Genet 20:356–370. doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0108-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Tang Y, Moretti R, Meiler J. 2024. Recent advances in automated structure-based de novo drug design. J Chem Inf Model 64:1794–1805. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Schauperl M, Denny RA. 2022. AI-based protein structure prediction in drug discovery: impacts and challenges. J Chem Inf Model 62:3142–3156. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Khan A, Tran TT, Rios R, Hanson B, Shropshire WC, Sun Z, Diaz L, Dinh AQ, Wanger A, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Palzkill T, Arias CA, Miller WR. 2019. Extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST309 harboring tandem guiana extended spectrum β-lactamase enzymes: a newly emerging threat in the United States. Open Forum Infect Dis 6:ofz273. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Papp-Wallace KM, Bethel CR, Distler AM, Kasuboski C, Taracila M, Bonomo RA. 2010. Inhibitor resistance in the KPC-2 beta-lactamase, a preeminent property of this class A beta-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:890–897. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00693-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Papp-Wallace KM, Winkler ML, Taracila MA, Bonomo RA. 2015. Variants of β-lactamase KPC-2 that are resistant to inhibition by avibactam. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:3710–3717. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04406-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. González LJ, Moreno DM, Bonomo RA, Vila AJ. 2014. Host-specific enzyme-substrate interactions in SPM-1 metallo-β-lactamase are modulated by second sphere residues. PLoS Pathog 10:e1003817. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Arca-Suárez J, Lasarte-Monterrubio C, Rodiño-Janeiro B-K, Cabot G, Vázquez-Ucha JC, Rodríguez-Iglesias M, Galán-Sánchez F, Beceiro A, González-Bello C, Oliver A, Bou G. 2021. Molecular mechanisms driving the in vivo development of OXA-10-mediated resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam during treatment of XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 76:91–100. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Bush K, Macalintal C, Rasmussen BA, Lee VJ, Yang Y. 1993. Kinetic interactions of tazobactam with beta-lactamases from all major structural classes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37:851–858. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.4.851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Mojica MF, De La Cadena E, Ríos R, García-Betancur JC, Díaz L, Reyes J, Hernández-Gómez C, Radice M, Gales AC, Castañeda Méndez P, Munita JM, Pallares CJ, Martínez JRW, Villegas MV. 2022. Molecular mechanisms leading to ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from five Latin American countries. Front Microbiol 13:1035609. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1035609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Frase H, Smith CA, Toth M, Champion MM, Mobashery S, Vakulenko SB. 2011. Identification of products of inhibition of GES-2 beta-lactamase by tazobactam by x-ray crystallography and spectrometry. J Biol Chem 286:14396–14409. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.208744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Barber GR, Safdar A. 2015. 35 - unique antibacterial agents, p 440–446. In Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ (ed), Mandell, douglas, and bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases, 8th ed. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia. [Google Scholar]
- 90. Rangarajan R, Venkataraman R. 2020. Chapter 3 - antibiotics targeting Gram-negative bacteria, p 39–70. In Kesharwani P, Chopra S, Dasgupta A (ed), Drug discovery targeting drug-resistant bacteria. Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 91. Bethel CR, Hujer AM, Helfand MS, Bonomo RA. 2004. Exploring the effectiveness of tazobactam against ceftazidime resistant Escherichia coli: insights from the comparison between susceptibility testing and beta-lactamase inhibition. FEMS Microbiol Lett 234:99–103. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.03.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Li R, Mohsin M, Lincopan N. 2022. Editorial: investigating antimicrobial resistance with single-molecule sequencing technologies: opportunities and challenges. Front Microbiol 13:913662. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.913662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Berbers B, Saltykova A, Garcia-Graells C, Philipp P, Arella F, Marchal K, Winand R, Vanneste K, Roosens NHC, De Keersmaecker SCJ. 2020. Combining short and long read sequencing to characterize antimicrobial resistance genes on plasmids applied to an unauthorized genetically modified Bacillus. Sci Rep 10:4310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61158-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Garza-Ramos U, Barrios H, Reyna-Flores F, Tamayo-Legorreta E, Catalan-Najera JC, Morfin-Otero R, Rodríguez-Noriega E, Volkow P, Cornejo-Juarez P, González A, Gaytan-Martinez J, Del Rocío Gónzalez-Martínez M, Vazquez-Farias M, Silva-Sanchez J. 2015. Widespread of ESBL- and carbapenemase GES-type genes on carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates: a multicenter study in Mexican hospitals. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 81:135–137. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.09.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Abouelhassan Y, Gill CM, Nicolau DP. 2023. Assessing the in vivo efficacy of rational antibiotics and combinations against difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing GES β-lactamases. J Antimicrob Chemother 78:1843–1847. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Rehman A, Jeukens J, Levesque RC, Lamont IL. 2021. Gene-gene interactions dictate ciprofloxacin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and facilitate prediction of resistance phenotype from genome sequence data. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65:e0269620. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02696-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Thacharodi A, Lamont IL. 2023. Gene-gene interactions reduce aminoglycoside susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa through efflux pump-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Antibiotics (Basel) 12:2975–2983. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12010152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Ramsay KA, Rehman A, Wardell ST, Martin LW, Bell SC, Patrick WM, Winstanley C, Lamont IL. 2023. Ceftazidime resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is multigenic and complex. PLoS One 18:e0285856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Baynham PJ, Ramsey DM, Gvozdyev BV, Cordonnier EM, Wozniak DJ. 2006. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa ribbon-helix-helix DNA-binding protein AlgZ (AmrZ) controls twitching motility and biogenesis of type IV pili. J Bacteriol 188:132–140. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.1.132-140.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Choi K-H, Kumar A, Schweizer HP. 2006. A 10-min method for preparation of highly electrocompetent Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells: application for DNA fragment transfer between chromosomes and plasmid transformation. J Microbiol Methods 64:391–397. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Hoang TT, Karkhoff-Schweizer RR, Kutchma AJ, Schweizer HP. 1998. A broad-host-range Flp-FRT recombination system for site-specific excision of chromosomally-located DNA sequences: application for isolation of unmarked Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants. Gene 212:77–86. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(98)00130-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Wardell SJT, Rehman A, Martin LW, Winstanley C, Patrick WM, Lamont IL. 2019. A large-scale whole-genome comparison shows that experimental evolution in response to antibiotics predicts changes in naturally evolved clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e01619-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01619-19:e01619-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Wiegand I, Hilpert K, Hancock REW. 2008. Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc 3:163–175. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S, Cattoir V, Philippon A, Allesoe RL, Rebelo AR, Florensa AF, et al. 2020. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:3491–3500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Alcock BP, Huynh W, Chalil R, Smith KW, Raphenya AR, Wlodarski MA, Edalatmand A, Petkau A, Syed SA, Tsang KK, et al. 2023. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D690–D699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Ross K, Varani AM, Snesrud E, Huang H, Alvarenga DO, Zhang J, Wu C, McGann P, Chandler M. 2021. TnCentral: a prokaryotic transposable element database and web portal for transposon analysis. mBio 12:e0206021. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02060-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Camacho C, Boratyn GM, Joukov V, Vera Alvarez R, Madden TL. 2023. ElasticBLAST: accelerating sequence search via cloud computing. BMC Bioinformatics 24:117. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05245-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Treangen TJ, Ondov BD, Koren S, Phillippy AM. 2014. The harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol 15:524. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0524-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Subedi D, Vijay AK, Kohli GS, Rice SA, Willcox M. 2018. Comparative genomics of clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from different geographic sites. Sci Rep 8:15668. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34020-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Stöver BC, Müller KF. 2010. TreeGraph 2: combining and visualizing evidence from different phylogenetic analyses. BMC Bioinformatics 11:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Guerrero-Araya E, Muñoz M, Rodríguez C, Paredes-Sabja D. 2021. FastMLST: a multi-core tool for multilocus sequence typing of draft genome assemblies. Bioinform Biol Insights 15:11779322211059238. doi: 10.1177/11779322211059238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Figure S1: Extended phylogenetic tree. Figure S2: Maps of acquired genetic elements.
Supplemental tables detailing genomes analyzed, MIC replicate data, and methods-related materials.
An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.

