Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 2;25:776. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07905-0

Table 5.

Changes in shoulder muscle strength ratio during follow-up

Variable Group Preoperative 6 months postoperative 12 months postoperative Effect F p value partial η2
Scaption CE 69.22 ± 24.27 67.53 ± 22.29 79.84 ± 18.74 G 3.88 0.025* 0.087
RE 67.94 ± 25.66 55.16 ± 18.15 66.13 ± 14.06 T 7.81 0.002** 0.088
C 70.12 ± 22.64 58.14 ± 13.74 63.81 ± 13.02 G×T 1.97 0.124 0.046
Post-hoc CE > RE# CE > RE, C###
External Rotation CE 78.14 ± 19.04 73.98 ± 23.74 80.20 ± 13.61 G 4.15 0.019* 0.093
RE 80.76 ± 16.11 63.03 ± 14.82 69.18 ± 14.45 T 13.48 0.000*** 0.143
C 76.31 ± 18.13 60.92 ± 16.42 70.90 ± 13.20 G×T 2.01 0.103 0.047
Post-hoc CE > RE# CE > RE, C##
Internal Rotation CE 88.15 ± 16.01 83.95 ± 19.10 87.19 ± 10.13 G 5.41 0.006* 0.118
RE 87.56 ± 8.59 76.16 ± 9.80 82.54 ± 9.57 T 11.94 0.000*** 0.128
C 81.84 ± 15.12 73.74 ± 8.94 81.37 ± 7.51 G×T 0.97 0.427 0.023
Post-hoc CE > RE#

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation

CE: corrective exercise; RE: rotator cuff exercise; C: Control; G: group; T: time

The result of RM ANOVA was described: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

The result of One-way ANOVA for post-hoc was described: #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001