Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 3.
Published in final edited form as: Open J Educ Res. 2024 Sep 5;4(5):243–255. doi: 10.31586/ojer.2024.1056

Table 4.

Logistic Regression Model Without and With Intersection of Education and Caste

Beta SE OR 95% CI Sig
Main Effect Model (Model 1)
Age −.043 .001 .958 .957 .959 < .001
Scheduled Caste .814 .009 2.257 2.215 2.299 < .001
Education < .001
Primary
Secondary −1.332 .011 .264 .258 .270 < .001
Higher −2.554 .019 .078 .075 .081 < .001
Location (Urban) −1.913 .014 .148 .144 .152 < .001
Constant 1.631 .022 5.107 < .001
Interaction Model (Model 2)
Age −.043 .001 .958 .957 .959 < .001
Scheduled Caste .747 .016 2.111 2.048 2.176 < .001
Education < .001
Primary
Secondary −1.374 .017 .253 .245 .261 < .001
Higher −2.762 .029 .063 .060 .067 < .001
Education × Caste < .001
Secondary Education × Scheduled Caste .069 .020 1.071 1.030 1.114 < .001
Higher Education × Scheduled Caste .371 .038 1.449 1.346 1.559 < .001
Location Urban −1.910 .014 .148 .144 .152 < .001
Constant 1.669 .024 5.309 < .001