Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 28;12(10):e00691-24. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00691-24

TABLE 5.

Covariate-adjusted associations between school mask policy and SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced seroprevalence among individuals aged 5–11 years during the combined study periods (September 1–30, 2021 and December 15, 2021 to January 14, 2022)a

Prevalence ratios (PR) 95% CI
Mask Policy: No vs Full 1.21 1.10 1.32
Time Period: December vs September 1.06 0.93 1.22
Gender: Female vs Male 1.01 0.94 1.10
Region: Midwest vs Northeast 1.35 1.18 1.55
Region: South vs Northeast 1.24 1.07 1.43
Region: West vs Northeast 1.12 0.95 1.32
Race: NH Black vs NH White 1.38 1.19 1.60
Race: Hispanic vs NH White 0.88 0.67 1.16
Race: Hispanic and Black vs NH White 1.38 1.22 1.57
Race: Other vs NH White 1.01 0.91 1.13
Urbanicity: Non-urban vs Urban 0.99 0.90 1.08
Poverty Level: Above vs Below median 1.02 0.91 1.14
Education Level: High vs Low 0.77 0.68 0.88
County-level Vaccination Rate 1.09 1.03 1.15
County-level Cumulative Case Incidence 1.36 1.15 1.61
a

Poisson regression models with robust variance estimation model were applied to estimate the association between school mask policy status and seroprevalence, adjusting for individual-level covariates (age and sex), area-level covariates (Census region, county-level urbanicity), ZCTA-level majority race/ethnicity, education and poverty-level, time-period, and the county-level vaccination rate and cumulative case incidence. All the covariates are categorical except vaccination rate and cumulative case incidence, which were included as continuous measures.