TABLE 5.
Prevalence ratios (PR) | 95% CI | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mask Policy: No vs Full | 1.21 | 1.10 | 1.32 |
Time Period: December vs September | 1.06 | 0.93 | 1.22 |
Gender: Female vs Male | 1.01 | 0.94 | 1.10 |
Region: Midwest vs Northeast | 1.35 | 1.18 | 1.55 |
Region: South vs Northeast | 1.24 | 1.07 | 1.43 |
Region: West vs Northeast | 1.12 | 0.95 | 1.32 |
Race: NH Black vs NH White | 1.38 | 1.19 | 1.60 |
Race: Hispanic vs NH White | 0.88 | 0.67 | 1.16 |
Race: Hispanic and Black vs NH White | 1.38 | 1.22 | 1.57 |
Race: Other vs NH White | 1.01 | 0.91 | 1.13 |
Urbanicity: Non-urban vs Urban | 0.99 | 0.90 | 1.08 |
Poverty Level: Above vs Below median | 1.02 | 0.91 | 1.14 |
Education Level: High vs Low | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.88 |
County-level Vaccination Rate | 1.09 | 1.03 | 1.15 |
County-level Cumulative Case Incidence | 1.36 | 1.15 | 1.61 |
Poisson regression models with robust variance estimation model were applied to estimate the association between school mask policy status and seroprevalence, adjusting for individual-level covariates (age and sex), area-level covariates (Census region, county-level urbanicity), ZCTA-level majority race/ethnicity, education and poverty-level, time-period, and the county-level vaccination rate and cumulative case incidence. All the covariates are categorical except vaccination rate and cumulative case incidence, which were included as continuous measures.