Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 28;12(10):e00691-24. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00691-24

TABLE 6.

Covariate-adjusted associations between school mask policy and SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced seroprevalence among individuals aged 12–17 years during the combined study periods (September 1–30, 2021 and December 15, 2021 to January 14, 2022)a

Prevalence ratios (PR) 95% CI
Mask Policy: No vs Full 1.16 1.07 1.26
Time Period: December vs September 1.31 1.22 1.42
Gender: Female vs Male 1.01 0.95 1.07
Region: Midwest vs Northeast 1.14 1.04 1.26
Region: South vs Northeast 1.05 0.93 1.18
Region: West vs Northeast 0.90 0.82 0.99
Race: NH Black vs NH White 1.34 1.20 1.49
Race: Hispanic vs NH White 1.18 0.98 1.43
Race: Hispanic and Black vs NH White 1.26 1.07 1.47
Race: Other vs NH White 1.17 1.07 1.28
Urbanicity: Non-urban vs Urban 0.96 0.90 1.02
Poverty Level: Above vs Below median 1.04 0.96 1.12
Education Level: High vs Low 0.80 0.74 0.87
County-level Vaccination Rate 0.96 0.93 0.99
County-level Cumulative Case Incidence 1.24 1.09 1.41
a

Poisson regression models with robust variance estimation model were applied to estimate the association between school mask policy status and seroprevalence, adjusting for individual-level covariates (age and sex), area-level covariates (Census region, county-level urbanicity), ZCTA-level majority race/ethnicity, education and poverty-level, time-period, and the county-level vaccination rate and cumulative case incidence. All the covariates are categorical except vaccination rate and cumulative case incidence, which were included as continuous measures.