Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 16;50(4):e20240030. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20240030

Table 4. Descriptive analysis of grouped scores with five answer options in three interviews (N = 742) and the frequency of answer combinations.

Answers Frequency of answer combinations
Interview 1 Interview 2 Interview 3 n (%)
5 5 5 343 (46.2)
4 4 4 124 (16.7)
4 5 5 92 (12.4)
4 4 5 35 (4.7)
5 4 4 25 (3.4)
5 4 5 21 (2.8)
4 5 4 17 (2.3)
2 4 4 13 (17.5)
5 5 4 10 (1.3)
4 3 4 7 (0.9)
3 4 4 7 (0.9)
4 4 2 4 (0.5)
3 4 5 4 (0.5)
2 5 5 4 (0.5)
2 4 3 3 (0.4)
3 3 4 3 (0.4)
2 5 4 3 (0.4)
2 4 5 3 (0.4)
3 5 5 3 (0.4)
2 3 3 2 (0.3)
3 3 3 2 (0.3)
4 3 3 2 (0.3)
4 4 3 2 (0.3)
2 2 4 2 (0.3)
5 2 5 2 (0.3)
2 2 2 1 (0.1)
2 4 2 1 (0.1)
4 5 2 1 (0.1)
4 2 3 1 (0.1)
5 3 3 1 (0.1)
3 4 3 1 (0.1)
1 5 3 1 (0.1)
4 5 3 1 (0.1)
2 3 4 1 (0.1)

Option 1: strongly disagree; Option 2: disagree; Option 3: indifferent; Option 4: agree; and Option 5: strongly agree.