Table 1.

The Table Provides a Detailed Summary of Significant Findings Related to Trial Time, Path Length, Time in the Bathroom, Distance Backward, and Distance Sideways Based on Various Influencing Factors. ^a

	Trial Time			Path Length			Time in Bathroom			Distance Backward			Distance Sideways
Factors	β	SE	p	β	SE	p	β	SE	p	β	SE	p	β	SE	p
Toilet location	0.645	.791	.415	0.515	.124	<.001	0.550	.619	.375	−.010	.037	.778	−0.013	.071	.853
Room configuration	−0.742	.791	.348	−0.058	.124	.639	0.295	.619	.633	.111	.037	.003	0.096	.100	<.001
Door type	−1.858	.791	.019	−0.377	.124	.002	−1.746	.619	.005	−.929	.052	<.001	−0.777	.100	<.001
IV status	18.711	.791	<.001	1.920	.124	<.001	10.393	.619	<.001	−.062	.052	<.001	1.543	.071	<0.001
Exit side of the bed	−7.306	.791	<.001	−3.720	.124	<.001	−0.440	.619	.478	−.028	.037	0.443	−0.137	.071	.052
Set number	3.081	.791	<.001	0.269	.124	.030	2.052	.619	<.001	.044	.037	0.240	0.194	.071	.006
Door Type × IV Pole										.520	.074	<0.001
Room Configuration× Door Type													0.480	.141	<.001

^aThe beta coefficients (β), standard errors (SE), and p values are reported for each comparison. Reference levels for each variable were established as follows: outboard for toilet location, headwall for room configuration, swinging door for doortype, no IV for IV pole, right side of the bed for exit side of the bed position, and Set 2 for set number. Noteworthy interactions between door type and IV pole, as well as room configuration and door type, are also presented, contributing to a thorough understanding of the observed dynamics.