Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Oct 3;14:23033. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73537-y

Investigation of serum neurofilament light chain as a biomarker in Fabry disease

Markus Ponleitner 1,2,, Constantin Gatterer 3, Gabriel Bsteh 1,2, Jakob Rath 1,2, Patrick Altmann 1,2, Thomas Berger 1,2, Senta Graf 3, Gere Sunder-Plassmann 4, Paulus Stefan Rommer 1,2
PMCID: PMC11449901  PMID: 39362930

Abstract

Fabry disease (FD) constitutes a rare, X-linked lysosomal storage disorder affecting multiple organ systems, most notably heart, kidneys, and the central nervous system. Neurofilament light chains (NfL) have emerged as a prime candidate for a body fluid biomarker reflecting neuro-axonal injury. We aimed to evaluate its addition to the diagnostic and monitoring armamentarium in FD. Serum NfL concentrations (sNfL) were measured in 50 people with FD (PwFD) and 30 healthy control subjects (HC) using the Simoa© technology, followed by calculation of Z-scores adjusted for age and body mass index. In addition, clinical disease severity in PwFD was measured using the FOS-MSSI (Fabry outcome study – Mainz severity score index), which comprises clinical and paraclinical parameters. PwFD show elevated sNfL Z-scores compared to HC (PwFD: 1.12 [SD 1.5], HC: 0.01 [SD 1.2], p < 0.001). In PwFD, males showed higher sNfL Z-scores than females (1.75 [SD 1.5] vs. 0.73 [SD 1.4]). Importantly, sNfL Z-scores were increased in PwFD with ischemic white matter lesions of the CNS (1.5, SD 2.2 vs. 0.5, SD 2.9, p = 0.03). In our small cohort, sNfL Z-scores correlated fairly with FOS-MSSI (Kendall’s-Tau [τ] = 0.25, p = 0.01), and, interestingly with serum creatinine (τ = 0.28, p = 0.005) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, τ =-0.28, p = 0.005). Based on these exploratory results, sNfL might provide value as a biomarker of neuroaxonal damage in FD, possibly reflecting cerebrovascular injury. Additionally, the correlation of sNfL with renal function warrants further investigation.

Keywords: Fabry disease, Neurofilament light, Glomerular filtration rate, Biomarkers, Cerebrovascular disorders

Subject terms: Stroke, Stroke, Genetic testing, Metabolic disorders

Introduction

Fabry disease (FD; OMIM# 301500) is a complex, X-linked lysosomal storage disorder affecting multiple organ systems along a highly variable phenotypic spectrum. Variants in the GLA gene on Xq22.1 causing deficiency of the hydroxylase α-galactosidase A result in the accumulation of sphingolipids and their metabolites, mainly globotriaosylceramide (Gb-3) and globotriaosylsphingosine (Lyso-Gb3). This, in turn, induces metabolic dysfunction and ultimately damage to vasculature, central and peripheral nervous system (PNS, CNS), heart and kidneys, among other organ systems1. Despite the X-linked inheritance, the disease burden in females reaches from asymptomatic to severe affection comparable to males, a fact that is attributed to skewed X-inactivation, the mechanism of which is subject of ongoing debate2,3. The incidence of FD was previously reported to be 1:117 000 4, whereas more recent accounts from a European new born screening suggest a more common incidence of α-galactosidase deficiency of about 1:8000 5.

The main neurological disease manifestations include cerebrovascular pathology with stroke, as well as peripheral neuropathy including small-fiber neuropathy7. Additionally, studies hinted on FD-patients being increasingly affected by microstructural white matter changes, neurodegenerative changes, as well as cognitive dysfunction and depression810.

After establishing the diagnosis, two disease-specific forms of therapy are available: (i) three different formulations of intravenous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and (ii) an oral chaperone therapy. Both have shown efficacy in reducing disease burden and improving quality of life, as well as prevention of disease progression with stabilization of organ dysfunction and enhancement of lifespan1115.

In PwFD, regular follow-up appointments including blood tests, imaging, ultrasound and clinical examinations are required to guarantee standard of care in the outpatient setting22.

Neurofilament light-chain (NfL), an intermediary filament predominately expressed in myelinated axons and responsible for axonal diameter16,17, has been established as a valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool in many neurological diseases in recent years18. The advent of fourth-generation detection assays now allows reliable detection of NfL in peripheral blood (serum or plasma), thus markedly facilitating sample acquisition. Large studies have looked at the distribution of NfL-concentrations in healthy individuals and suggested reference values partitioned for age and body mass index, an important milestone in establishing this biomarker for routine patient care19,20. Additionally, standardized Z-scores adjusted for age and body mass index have been published21.

This study aimed to investigate the possible value of adding the biomarker sNfL to the diagnostic and monitoring armamentarium in the assessment of neurological disease manifestations in FD. We hypothesized that sNfL are increased in PwFD due to depositions of sphingolipids in all tissues, including peripheral and central nervous system.

Results

We analyzed the serum neurofilament light-chain concentration (sNfL) in 50 people with Fabry Disease (PwFD) and 30 healthy controls. Table 1 provides detailed information of both cohorts. The distribution of GLA-variants is shown in Fig. 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of PwFD and healthy controls.

PwFD, n = 50 HC, n = 30 p-value
Femalea 31 (62) 15 (50) 0.414d
Age, yearsb 44.3 (14.2) 41.3 (13.7) 0.336e

Age category

Age 18 to < 51a

Age 51 to < 61a

Age 61 to < 70a

32 (64)

11 (22)

7 (14)

20 (66)

8 (27)

2 (7)

BMIb 25.1 (4.4) 24.8 (4.4) 0.789e

Therapy

Agalsidase alphaa

Agalsidase betaa

Migalastata

Lucerastata

none

10 (20)

3 (6)

11 (22)

1 (2)

25 (50)

NA NA
Therapy-duration, monthsc 78 (155) NA NA
FOS-MSSIc 13 (14.8) NA NA

Mild (0–18)a

Moderate (19–36) a

Severe (> 36) a

29 (58) – Therapy 9/29

18 (36) – Therapy 13/18

3 (6) – Therapy 3/3

Lyso-Gb3 (ng/mL)b 8.5 (9.1) NA NA
Creatinine (mg/mL)c 0.80 (0.24) NA NA
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m²)b 91.9 (28.3) NA NA

PwFD: people with Fabry disease; HC: healthy controls; BMI: body-mass index; ERT: enzyme-replacement therapy; FOS-MSSI: Fabry Outcome Survey Mainz Severity Score Index; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI 2021); a: absolute (percentage); b: mean (standard deviation); c: median (interqartile-range); d: χ²-test; e: unequal variances t-test.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Distribution of GLA-variants in the presented cohort, comprising a total of 21 unique variants from 27 families. Variants are listed with coding DNA (c.) and protein (p.) nomenclature, separated by “|”.

PwFD showed a higher mean sNfL Z-score (1.12, standard deviation [SD] 1.5) compared to healthy controls (0.01, SD 1.2, p < 0.001, Table 2; Fig. 2A).

Table 2.

sNfL and Z-scores in PwFD vs. HC.

PwFD, n = 50 HC, n = 30 p-value
sNfL (pg/mL)a Z-scoreb sNfL (pg/mL)a Z-scoreb
all 12.3 (13.4) 1.12 (1.5) 8.0 (5.5) 0.01 (1.2) 0.003c | <0.001d
Age 18 to < 51 9.6 (10.2) 1.03 (1.7) 6.2 (5.1) 0.24 (1.3)
Age 51 to < 61 13.1 (6.6) 1.05 (1.3) 9.4 (2.8) -0.57 (0.7)
Age 61 to < 70 35.5 (20.1) 1.6 (0.9) 15.6 (3.8) 0.41 (1.3)
Male 21.9 (35.3) 1.75 (1.5) 7.4 (5.7) 0.19 (1.1)
Female 11.0 (7.9) 0.73 (1.4) 9.3 (5.0) -0.11 (1.2)
p-value sex-diff 0.018 c 0.022 d 0.935 c 0.497d

PwFD: people with Fabry disease; HC: healthy controls; a: median (interquartile-range), b: mean (standard-deviation), c: Wilcoxon rank sum test, d: welch two sample t-test.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

sNfL in PwFD. (A): sNfL Z-score distribution between cohorts and sex, (B) sNfL Z-score in PwFD with respect to ischemic CNS lesions, (C) correlation of sNfL Z-scores with eGFR, (D) correlation of sNfL Z-scores with FOS-MSSI, vertical lines represent cut-off values for disease severity (0–18, 19–36 and > 36 refer to mild, moderate, and severe, respectively). HC: healthy control, PwFD: people with Fabry disease, iWML: ischemic white matter lesions, eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI 2021), sNfL: Z-score of serum neurofilament light chain concentration adjusted for age and BMI. Asterisks denote signifcance (*: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001, NS: p ≥ 0.05).

In PwFD, males (1.75, SD 1.5) showed higher sNfL Z-scores than females (0.73, SD 1.4, p = 0.022), whereas there was no significant sNfL sex-difference in controls (p = 0.497, Fig. 2A; Table 2).

Severity of FD as measured by FOS-MSSI showed a fair positive correlation with sNfL Z-scores (τ = 0.25, p = 0.01, Fig. 2D). The difference of sNfL Z-scores in PwFD with a neurological subscore of the FOS-MSSI-Neuro ≥ 1 and FOS-MSSI-Neuro = 0 was not significant. Comparison of presence and absence of ischemic white matter lesions (iWML) in MRI (according to a cerebrovascular score ≥ 3) revealed significantly elevated sNfL absolute values. PwFD with iWML (n = 32) were significantly older than PwFD without iWML (n = 18, p = 0.005, Table 3). Irrespective of this age-distribution with iWML predominance in older PwFD, however, sNFL Z-scores in PwFD with and without iWML remained significantly increased (1.5, SD 2.2 vs. 0.5, SD 2.9, p = 0.03, Fig. 2B; Table 4). The difference of sNfL Z-scores in PwFD without iWML and HC was non-significant (0.5, SD 2.9 vs. 0.01, SD 1.2, p = 0.34).

Table 3.

Demographic details for PwFD with and without iWML and disease-specific therapy.

iWML present (n = 32) iWML absent (n = 18) p-value
Femalea 19 (59.4) 12 (66.7) 0.837d
Age b 48.7 (12.4) 36.6 (14.2) 0.005 e
BMI b 25.3 (4.1) 24.7 (5.0) 0.650e
Treated with disease specific therapya 19 (59.4) 6 (33.3) 0.14d
eGFR b 86.0 (30.8) 102.4 (20.1) 0.028 e
Lyso-Gb3c 8.2 (8.1) 9.5 (10.8) 0.653f
Disease-specific therapy (n = 25) No disease-specific therapy (n = 25)
Femalea 13 (52) 18 (72) 0.244d
Age b 49.3 (12.2) 39.4 (14.5) 0.012 e
FOS-MSSI c 21.0 (16) 9.0 (8) < 0.001 f

iWML: ischemic white matter lesions; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI 2021); FOS-MSSI: Fabry Outcome Survey Mainz Severity Score Index. a: absolute (percentage); b: mean (standard deviation); c: median (interqartile-range); d: χ²-test; e: unequal variances t-test; f: Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Table 4.

sNfL and Z-score characterization in PwFD. eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI 2021).

sNfL (pg/mL)a Z-scoreb p-values
No therapy (n = 25) 9.7 (7.7) 0.75 (1.6) 0.015c| 0.094d
Any therapy (n = 25) 16.3 (20.6) 1.48 (1.4)
FOS-MSSI 0 to 18 (n = 29) 9.3 (5.5) 0.59 (1.5)
FOS-MSSI 19 to 36 (n = 18) 24.1 (32.3) 1.93 (1.4)
FOS-MSSI > 36 (n = 3) 17.1 (9.7) 1.34 (0.7)
FOS-MSSI-Neuro > 0 (n = 40) 14.7 (23.5) 1.17 (1.6) 0.108c| 0.520d
FOS-MSSI-Neuro = 0 (n = 10) 9.5 (5.0) 0.89 (1.1)
Ischemic lesions present (n = 32) 16.2 (25.4) 1.5 (2.2) 0.003 c | 0.030 d
Ischemic lesions absent (n = 18) 9.0 (6.6) 0.5 (2.9)
Renal dysfunction present (eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2, n = 17) 30.9 (48.6) 2.0 (1.6) < 0.001c| 0.008d
Renal dysfunction absent (eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2, n = 33) 9.9 (7.7) 0.9 (1.3)
Lyso-Gb3 > 3.5 ng/mL (n = 31) 16.0 (18.8) 1.36 (1.6) 0.110c| 0.139d
Lyso-Gb3 ≤ 3.5 ng/mL (n = 19) 9.7 (6.9) 0.72 (1.4)
Normal troponin T (0–14 ng/L, n = 26) 9.6 (9.5) 0.9 (1.6) 0.441e
Borderline troponin T (15–50 ng/L, n = 15) 13.0 (13.3) 1.3 (1.3)
Elevated troponin T (> 50 ng/L, n = 9) 35.8 (35.4) 1.6 (1.8)
Akroparesthesia* present (n = 20) 10.9 (10.0) 0.90 (1.9) 0.583c| 0.679d
Akroparesthesia* absent (n = 28) 12.9 (10.7) 1.10 (1.1)

a: median (interquartile-range), b: mean (standard deviation), c: Wilcoxon rank sum test, d: unequal variances t-test, e: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA, based on Z-scores), *information on acroparesthesia unavailable for 2 patients.

Lyso-Gb3 concentrations were higher in males (13.9 ng/mL, IQR 18.1) than in females (3.4 ng/mL, IQR 3.5, p < 0.001). Sex-specific analysis yielded no significant correlation of Lyso-Gb3 with sNfL (females: τ = 0.10, p-Value = 0.424; males: τ = 0.22, p-Value = 0.183).

While we found significantly lower sNfL absolute values in treatment naïve PwFD (median 9.7 pg/mL, IQR 7.7) compared to those receiving any disease-specific therapy (ERT or chaperone-therapy, 16.3 pg/mL, IQR 20.6, p = 0.015), this difference failed to achieve significance when analyzing sNfL Z-scores (0.75, SD 1.6 vs. 1.48, SD 1.4; p = 0.094, Table 4). PwFD receiving disease-specific therapy were significantly older (49.3 years [SD 12.2] vs. 39.4 years [SD 14.5], p = 0.012, Table 3) and more severely affected with significantly higher FOS-MSSI (any specific therapy: median 21.0, IQR 16.0, no specific therapy: median 9.0, IQR 8.0, p < 0.001, Table 3). Similarly, sNfL absolute values in PwFD showed a significant correlation with troponin T (TnT). However, TnT correlated even more strongly with age (data not shown). This is also reflected in the absence of significant group differences of sNfL Z-scores between PwFD with normal, borderline and elevated TnT (Table 4). There was no appreciable correlation of sNfL Z-scores or absolute sNfL values with duration of therapy (data not shown).

Mean sNfL Z-scores in PwFD with and without history of acroparesthesia did not differ significantly (0.9, SD 1.9 vs. 1.1, SD 1.1, p = 0.679; available for n = 48 PwFD, Table 4). While not available in all patients, mean sympathetic skin response latency to upper and lower extremities (SSRU: n = 36, SSRL: n = 34, respectively) as a surrogate marker for damage to autonomic nerves showed no correlation with the presence of acroparesthesia or sNfL-concentration in PwFD ( NfL-Z-score: SSRU τ = -0.14, p = 0.210, SSRL τ = -0.019, p = 0.870; data on acroparesthesia not shown).

SNfL Z-scores were significantly higher in PwFD with renal dysfunction (eGFR < 90mL/min/1.73 m², Table 4) and correlated significantly with serum-creatinine levels and eGFR (τ = 0.28, p < 0.01, τ = -0.28, p < 0.01, Fig. 2D). Interestingly, PwFD with iWML had significantly lower eGFR compared to those without iMWL (Table 3).

Absolute sNfL-concentrations show a moderate correlation with age (τ = 0.43, p < 0.001). Upon analysis of Z-scores, there remained no residual correlation with age above Z-score-standardization (Pearson’s r = 0.23, p-Value = 0.11).

Discussion

In this exploratory study, we aimed to investigate the potential of sNfL as a diagnostic and monitoring biomarker in FD.

In a large and representative cohort of PwFD, we found that sNfL-concentrations were (i) significantly higher in PwFD compared to healthy controls, (ii) significantly higher in PwFD with iWML, and (iii) correlated with clinical and paraclinical parameters of disease severity (FOS-MSSI, Fig. 2).

These findings are contrary to a small previous study, which found no significant difference in serum NfL levels in 12 female PwFD compared to 12 matched controls. However, sNfL concentrations were determined with ELISA and only one woman with FD was affected severely enough to receive ERT23. The different results reported in the current study may be explained by the inclusion of both men and women in our study. Additionally, our cohort was more severely affected, as indicated by the higher number of PwFD receiving disease specific therapy. Thirdly, we utilized the SIMOA technology in our analysis, compared to ELISA.

Unsurprisingly, in our study, sNfL was higher in male PwFD compared to female PwFD (Fig. 2), fitting the X-linked inheritance pattern. Similarly, the increasing absolute sNfL-concentration with higher age appears easily conceivable for a lysosomal storage disease with accumulation of pathogenic metabolites over time. Upon consideration of sNfL Z-scores, however, no significant correlation above age adjustment was evident. This highlights the importance of incorporating standardized Z-scores into biomarker research, whenever possible.

The correlation of sNfL and FOS-MSSI appears equally plausible, although PwFD in the severe FOS-MSSI category were not those with the highest sNfL-concentrations (Table 4); as our cohort only included 3 PwFD in this group, analysis in a larger sample is required before definite statements regarding this can be permitted.

The neurological subscore of the FOS-MSSI does not seem to be the main driver behind this correlation, as sNfL Z-scores in PwFD with a neurological subscore of ≥ 1 and 0 show no significant difference (Table 4).

Importantly however, comparison of PwFD with and without ischemic white matter lesions on cerebral imaging (FOS-MSSI-cerebrovascular ≥ 3) yielded a significant difference in sNfL Z-scores (p = 0.03, Tables 3 and 4; Fig. 2). This increase of sNfL with the presence of iWML is in line with increased sNfL in people with ischemic stroke24 and other diseases with involvement of the white matter and increased sNfL18.

To further corroborate this finding, the difference of sNfL Z-scores in PwFD without iWML lesions and healthy controls was not significant (p = 0.34). While requiring confirmation and further characterization, this association of increased sNfL and white matter lesions might help in routine patient care to monitor CNS integrity, without requiring a costly annual MRI.

Although large fiber peripheral neuropathy has been linked to an elevation in sNfL25,26, damage to small nerve fibers does not appear to cause an increase in sNfL27. Accordingly, we found no difference in sNfL-concentration in PwFD with respect to acroparesthesia, which is thought to be partly due to a small fiber neuropathy28,29.

The significance of the difference of sNfL absolute values in PwFD receiving any disease-specific therapy compared to treatment naïve PwFD (p = 0.015) failed significance when analyzing Z-scores (p = 0.094). Indeed, the absence of disease-specific therapy most likely reflects mild disease-severity without relevant organ damage evident through a significantly lower FOS-MSSI, as well as younger age. On the other hand, improvement of increased sNfL with disease specific therapy seems equally plausible; and while we could not show any meaningful correlation of sNfL Z-scores with duration of therapy in analysis of a single timepoint, assessment of longitudinal change in sNfL will be required to clarify the association with disease specific therapy.

Interestingly, we found a fair correlation between sNfL Z-scores and serum creatinine and eGFR. A correlation of the concentration of NfL in blood (serum or plasma) with creatinine and eGFR has indeed been described in previous studies3032, maybe hinting at another, yet unknown mechanism by which an increase in blood-NfL is associated with a reduction in renal function, which – after all – has not been directly linked to neuro-axonal injury.

Although the elimination of sNfL in humans has not been understood in detail, urinary excretion seems unlikely, as NfL, is hardly detectable in urine33 and does not appear elevated in patients with end-stage renal disease (eGFR < 10 mL/min/1.73 m²) requiring hemodialysis, who showed maximum sNfL-concentration below 20 pg/mL34. The considerable size of NfL with 68 kDa would also argue against renal filtration35.

One possible route of degradation could lie in uptake by macrophages and/or the reticuloendothelial system and subsequent intracellular metabolism, similar to the proposed clearance of e.g. von Willebrand factor36. Hampered intracellular degradation with impaired lysosomal metabolism in a lysosomal storage disorder, however, could be envisaged to cause rising sNfL-levels over decades suffering from this disease.

On the other hand, eGFR has been shown to be a prominent biomarker for FD predicting Fabry-associated clinical events and disease progression37,38. A decrease in renal clearance might thus represent a general parameter of disease-severity.

While the size of our cohort considering the rarity of FD and the good clinical phenotyping can be considered as strengths of our study, we must acknowledge several limitations. Any differences and extrapolations based on subgroups have to be verified in larger samples as small sample sizes can easily interfere with statistical testing. A single-timepoint analysis of a biomarker in FD could fall short of detecting meaningful changes over time, hence a more detailed investigation including longitudinal data is required to further evaluate the role of sNfL as a biomarker in FD.

Methods

Patient recruitment and phenotyping

During routine annual visits in the outpatient FD clinic of the department of Neurology at the Medical University of Vienna, patients were presented with the option to participate in this study. After obtaining written consent, patients underwent examinations as per the FD outpatient protocol in collaboration with the departments of cardiology and nephrology, comprising neurological examination, blood sampling including determination of Lyso-Gb3 (ng/mL) from dried blood spots via mass spectrometry, urinalysis, transthoracic echocardiogram, electrocardiogram, nerve conduction studies including sympathetic skin response, as well as calculation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m²) from age, sex and serum-creatinine, according to the CKD-EPI 2021 formula39. Magnetic resonance imaging of heart and brain was performed, according to state-of-the-art patientcare. Classification of disease severity was documented according to the Fabry Outcome Survey Mainz Severity Score Index (FOS-MSSI), where 0–18, 19–36 and > 36 referred to mild, moderate, and severe affection, respectively40. Parameters not objectively tested were scored by the treating physician based on history or patient reported outcomes.

Healthy controls were included upon informed consent for blood sampling, MR-imaging and received monetary compensation.

Inclusion criteria for PwFD consisted of a genetically confirmed diagnosis (pathogenic GLA-variant, not all variants found in our cohort have been unequivocally classified ), age between 18 and 80 years and the ability to give informed consent.

Of 56 persons screened between 06/2020 and 06/2023, 6 had to be excluded due to non-pathogenic variants (2x c.427G > A | p.Ala143Thr; 2x c.937G > T | p.Asp313Tyr; 1x c.460 A > G | p.Ile154Val; 1x c.352 C > T | p.Arg118Cys).

The main inclusion criterion for healthy controls was the absence of a known neurological or severe systemic disorder or pathological findings in the neurological examination or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain.

Neurofilament light-chain measurement and calculation of Z-scores

Measurement of neurofilament light chains was conducted in duplicates as previously described41. After thawing for 60 min, the assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions and protocol using the Simoa® NF-light kits, calibrators and consumables in the Simoa® SR-X Analyzer (Quanterix, Lexington, MA, USA)42. Briefly, duplicate calibrators and single samples were equilibrated to room temperature and dispensed in 96-well plates. Subsequently, incubation with detectors and paramagnetic bead solutions was done according to the instructions. Washing and incubation was performed in the Simoa® microplate incubator and microplate washer. Sample readout and concentration analysis was calculated on the Quanterix SR-X Analyzer. According to the manual, determination of concentrations from 0 to 2000 pg/mL is considered reliable. Statistical analysis was performed including all sample data.

Standardized sNfL Z-scores adjusted for age and body mass index were calculated according to the literature21.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed in R studio (Version 4.2.2, RStudio, Inc.). Categorical variables are reported with absolute counts and percentages, continuous variables are reported as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range, depending on the distribution of the values as assessed by Shapiro-Wilk-test. Univariate group comparisons were evaluated using the chi-square-test, the independent t-test (with Welch correction in case of unequal variances between groups), Mann-Whitney-U-test or ANOVA (for multiple groups) as appropriate. Bivariate correlations were analyzed by means of Pearson or Kendall, depending on normal distribution. P-values smaller than 0.05 were considered significant. Due to the exploratory nature of this study, no correction for repeated measurements was performed.

Conclusion

Analysis of PwFD reveals increased sNfL Z-scores compared to healthy controls. Among PwFD, higher sNfL Z-scores were found in the presence of ischemic white matter lesions in the CNS. Interestingly, while sNfL Z-scores are associated with disease-severity, also impaired renal function measured with serum-creatinine and eGFR appears to be fairly correlated with sNfL. Since the elimination of NfL is still not fully understood, maybe impaired lysosomal metabolism is involved in its observed increase in addition to cerebrovascular injury. Befitting the X-linked inheritance with random X-inactivation in females responsible for phenotypic variability, sNfL levels were higher in males than in females. As sNfL is easily obtainable and shows a robust correlation with disease severity in FD (FOS-MSSI, iWML) it might be a suitable biomarker for CNS injury and general disease severity in PwFD, although further examination is still required.

Author contributions

MP acquired and analyzed data, recruited patients and conceived and drafted the manuscript; CG acquired data and revised the manuscript; GB helped with data analysis, interpretation and revised the manuscript; JR recruited patients and provided essential input concerning interpretation of the data; PA helped with acquiring data, designing measurements and revised the manuscript; TB provided essential feedback and manuscript revision; SG helped with acquiring data and revised the manuscript; GSP provided essential feedback and manuscript revision, PSR conceptualized the project, helped with data acquisition and interpretation and revision of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a research grant (IIT) from Amicus therapeutics Inc. awarded to PSR, used to purchase SIMOA®-kits and consumables for sNfL-measurements.

Data availability

Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request by a qualified researcher and upon approval by the data-clearing committee of the Medical University of Vienna.

Declarations

Competing interests

MP has received speaker or consulting honoraria from Amicus and participated in meetings sponsored by and received travel funding from Amicus, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme.CG has received speaker or consulting honoraria from Amicus therapeutics, Sanofi-Genzyme and Takeda pharmaceuticals and participated in meetings sponsored by and received travel funding from Amicus, Sanofi-Genzyme and Takeda PharmaceuticalsGB has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. He has received unrestricted research grants from Celgene/BMS and Novartis.JR has received consulting fees from Takeda. PA has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting from Biogen. He received a research grant from Quanterix International and was awarded a combined sponsorship from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, and Teva for a clinical study.TB has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, Biologix, BMS/Celgene, Eisai, Janssen-Cilag, Jazz/GW, Horizon, MedDay, Merck, Neuraxpharm, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Teva. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Biogen, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, Teva) and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva.SG has received speaker or consulting honoraria from Amicus and Sanofi-AventisGSP reports advisory board participation for and honoraria from Amicus Therapeutics, Inc., Chiesi and Sanofi, research grants/funding from Amicus Therapeutics, Takeda, Idorsia and FreelinePSR has received honoraria for consultancy/speaking from AbbVie, Almirall, Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva and has received research grants from Amicus, Biogen, Merck, and Roche.

Ethical approval

The ethics committee at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria approved this study (EK1487/2020). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient, and study-procedures adhered to the guidelines set by the Declaration of Helsinki.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Germain, D. P. Fabry disease. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 5, 30 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dobrovolny, R. et al. Relationship between X-inactivation and clinical involvement in Fabry heterozygotes. Eleven novel mutations in the alpha-galactosidase A gene in the Czech and Slovak population. J. Mol. Med. (Berl). 83, 647–654 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wagenhäuser, L. et al. X-chromosomal inactivation patterns in women with Fabry disease. Mol. Genet. Genomic Med. 10, e2029 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Meikle, P. J., Hopwood, J. J., Clague, A. E. & Carey, W. F. Prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders. JAMA. 281, 249–254 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gragnaniello, V. et al. Newborn screening for Fabry disease in northeastern Italy: Results of five years of experience. Biomolecules. 11, 951 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Germain, D. P. et al. Challenging the traditional approach for interpreting genetic variants: Lessons from Fabry disease. Clin. Genet. 101, 390–402 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schiffmann, R. & Moore, D. F. Neurological manifestations of Fabry disease. in Fabry Disease: Perspectives from 5 Years of FOS (eds Mehta, A., Beck, M. & Sunder-Plassmann, G.) (Oxford PharmaGenesis, 2006). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ulivi, L. et al. White matter integrity correlates with cognition and disease severity in Fabry disease. Brain. 143, 3331–3342 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Löhle, M. et al. Clinical prodromes of neurodegeneration in Anderson-Fabry disease. Neurology. 84, 1454–1464 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bolsover, F. E., Murphy, E., Cipolotti, L., Werring, D. J. & Lachmann, R. H. Cognitive dysfunction and depression in Fabry disease: A systematic review. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 37, 177–187 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ramaswami, U. et al. Cardio- renal outcomes with long- term agalsidase alfa enzyme replacement therapy: A 10-year Fabry outcome survey (FOS) analysis. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 13, 3705–3715 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Germain, D. P. et al. The effect of enzyme replacement therapy on clinical outcomes in male patients with Fabry disease: A systematic literature review by a European panel of experts. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 19, 100454 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Germain, D. P. et al. The effect of enzyme replacement therapy on clinical outcomes in female patients with Fabry disease - A systematic literature review by a European panel of experts. Mol. Genet. Metab. 126, 224–235 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Feldt-Rasmussen, U. et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of migalastat treatment in Fabry disease: 30-month results from the open-label extension of the randomized, phase 3 ATTRACT study. Mol. Genet. Metab. 131, 219–228 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bichet, D. G. et al. Long-term follow-up of renal function in patients treated with migalastat for Fabry disease. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 28, 100786 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hoffman, P. N. et al. Neurofilament gene expression: A major determinant of axonal caliber. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 84, 3472–3476 (1987). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Trojanowski, J., Walkenstein, N. & Lee, V. Expression of neurofilament subunits in neurons of the central and peripheral nervous system: an immunohistochemical study with monoclonal antibodies. J. Neurosci. 6, 650–660 (1986). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Khalil, M. et al. Neurofilaments as biomarkers in neurological disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 14, 577–589 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Simrén, J. et al. Establishment of reference values for plasma neurofilament light based on healthy individuals aged 5–90 years. Brain Commun. 4, fcac174 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Khalil, M. et al. Serum neurofilament light levels in normal aging and their association with morphologic brain changes. Nat. Commun. 11, 812 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Benkert, P. et al. Serum neurofilament light chain for individual prognostication of disease activity in people with multiple sclerosis: A retrospective modelling and validation study. Lancet Neurol. 21, 246–257 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Üçeyler, N. et al. Diagnose und Therapie des Morbus Fabry, S1-Leitlinie. (2022).
  • 23.Hołub, T., Kędzierska, K., Muras-Szwedziak, K. & Nowicki, M. Serum neurofilament light chain is not a useful biomarker of central nervous system involvement in women with Fabry disease. Intractable Rare Dis. Res. 10, 276–282 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pekny, M. et al. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) in blood - A biomarker predicting unfavourable outcome in the acute phase and improvement in the late phase after stroke. Cells. 10, 1537 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mortensen, C. et al. Neurofilament light chain as a biomarker of axonal damage in sensory neurons and paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with ovarian cancer. Pain. 164, 1502–1511 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Määttä, L. L. et al. Serum neurofilament light chain - A potential biomarker for polyneuropathy in type 2 diabetes? Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 205, 110988 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Baka, P. et al. Studying serum neurofilament light chain levels as a potential new biomarker for small fiber neuropathy. Eur. J. Neurol. e16192. 10.1111/ene.16192 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 28.Liao, M. F. et al. The correlation of small fiber neuropathy with pain intensity and age in patients with Fabry’s disease: A cross sectional study within a large Taiwanese family. Biomed. J. 45, 406–413 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Burand, A. J. & Stucky, C. L. Fabry disease pain: Patient and preclinical parallels. Pain. 162, 1305–1321 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fitzgerald, K. C. et al. Contributors to serum NfL levels in people without neurologic disease. Ann. Neurol. 92, 688–698 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Akamine, S. et al. Renal function is associated with blood neurofilament light chain level in older adults. Sci. Rep. 10, 20350 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Körtvelyessy, P. et al. Serum neurofilament light chain in COVID-19 and the influence of renal function. Eur. J. Med. Res. 28, 389 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.van Engelen, M. P. E. et al. Urine as matrix for analysis of neurofilament light chain is not suitable to distinguish frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric diseases. Brain Commun. 5, fcad120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hou, Y. C. et al. The role of plasma neurofilament light protein for assessing cognitive impairment in patients with end-stage renal disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 13, 657794 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Koel-Simmelink, M. J. A., Teunissen, C. E., Behradkia, P., Blankenstein, M. A. & Petzold, A. The neurofilament light chain is not stable in vitro. Ann. Neurol. 69, 1065–1066 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Casari, C., Lenting, P. J., Wohner, N., Christophe, O. D. & Denis, C. V. Clearance of Von Willebrand factor. J. Thromb. Haemost. 11 (Suppl 1), 202–211 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hughes, D. A. et al. Long-term multisystemic efficacy of migalastat on Fabry-associated clinical events, including renal, cardiac and cerebrovascular outcomes. J. Med. Genet. 60, 722–731 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Haycroft, B. et al. Targeted literature review exploring the predictive value of estimated glomerular filtration rate and left ventricular mass index as indicators of clinical events in Fabry disease. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 18, 322 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Inker, L. A. et al. New creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations to estimate GFR without race. N Engl. J. Med. 385, 1737–1749 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Whybra, C., Bähner, F. & Baron, K. Measurement of disease severity and progression in Fabry disease. in Fabry Disease: Perspectives from 5 Years of FOS (eds Mehta, A., Beck, M. & Sunder-Plassmann, G.) (Oxford PharmaGenesis, 2006). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Altmann, P. et al. Serum neurofilament light chain withstands delayed freezing and repeated thawing. Sci. Rep. 10, 19982 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rissin, D. M. et al. Single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects serum proteins at subfemtomolar concentrations. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 595–599 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request by a qualified researcher and upon approval by the data-clearing committee of the Medical University of Vienna.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES