Table 1.
R1 | PhAlc IC50 /(nM) | NanoBRET EC50/(nM) | HTRF p-c-Jun(S63) EC50/(nM) | Western blot p-c-Jun (S73) EC50/(nM) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN-8 | 3805 ± 402 | 417 ± 38 | 2127 ± 135 | 8975 ± 2680 | |
IN-8a | 5333 ± 232 | x | 6792 ± 256 | n.a. | |
JNK-IN-8 | 44 ± 6 | 10.5 ± 0.5 | 88 ± 8 | 760 ± 120 | |
CA-IN-8 | 318 ± 45 | 166 ± 35 | 4970 ± 620 | 8624 ± 1973 | |
1aR-IN-8 | 22 ± 6 | 11.5 ± 0.7 | 135 ± 15 | 660 ± 100 | |
1aS-IN-8 | 30 ± 5 | 3.3 ± 1.7 | 65 ± 7 | 320 ± 120a | |
1a’R-IN-8 | 225 ± 17 | 1060 ± 150 | 747 ± 247 | 4320 ± 1380 | |
1a”-IN-8 | 349 ± 24 | 650 ± 180 | 644 ± 110 | 7330 ± 3600a | |
2-IN-8 | 780 ± 159 | 76 ± 30 | 616 ± 169 | 3350 ± 370a | |
3-IN-8 | 254 ± 55 | 240 ± 70 | 378 ± 108 | 6710 ± 980a | |
4-IN-8 | 37 ± 4 | 9.4 ± 0.4 | 220 ± 25 | n.a. | |
5S-IN-8 | 641 ± 126 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
5R-IN-8 | 537 ± 131 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
6S,S-IN-8 | 59 ± 4 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
6 R,R-IN-8 | 128 ± 3 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
The p-c-Jun EC50 values were determined with two different methods, by an HTRF based assay with a p-c-Jun(Ser63) antibody or by the classical western blot based method with a p-c-Jun(Ser73) antibody; and the Pearson coefficient (0.68) calculated with the nine data points indicated a strong positive correlation between these two methods as expected. JNK activation was induced by doxycycline treatment in both cases and inhibitors were co-administered with the inducer and the respective p-c-Jun signal was measured after 6 h.
(Data show the mean ± parameter error estimate from weighted least squares method; for NanoBRET n = 2; for other measurements n = 3, independent experiments, except for a where n = 1; n.a.: not available, not measured; x denotes that target engagement with NanoLuc-JNK1 could not be quantitatively measured due to lack of change in the BRET signal; Supplementary Fig. 1, 6, 7 and 8).