Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 2;12:e18157. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18157

Figure 3. Comparison of the expression levels of selected DEGs between normal and cervical cancer samples in public databases.

Figure 3

(A) Comparison of APOD expression levels in public databases. (B) Comparison of MASP1 expression levels in public databases. (C) Comparison of ACKR1 expression levels in public databases. (D) Comparison of C1QTNF7 expression levels in public databases. (E) Comparison of SFRP4 expression levels in public databases. (F) Comparison of HSPB6 expression levels in public databases. (G) Comparison of GSTM5 expression levels in public databases. (H) Comparison of IGFBP6 expression levels in public databases. (I) Comparison of F10 expression levels in public databases. (J) Comparison of DCN expression levels in public databases. Statistical method was Mann-Whitney U test. Data was presented as Mean ± SEM.