Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 5;14:23187. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74497-z

Table 3.

Receiver operating characteristic analysis for each parameter in differentiating NL from KCS.

AUROC 95% CI Cutoff Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
Scansys
 KCP 0.813 0.745–0.881 > 8.9 67.61 85.85
Pentacam
 BAD-D 0.970 0.950–0.990 > 1.525 92.96 89.62
 IS-value 0.669 0.582–0.755 > 0.665 47.89 84.91
 KISA 0.604 0.518–0.690 > 6.21 49.30 71.70
 ISV 0.756 0.681–0.830 > 21.5 54.93 87.74
 IVA 0.756 0.681–0.831 > 0.195 42.25 96.23
 KI 0.724 0.641–0.806 > 1.045 56.34 83.96
 CKI 0.633 0.548–0.717 > 1.015 22.54 95.28
 IHA 0.611 0.522–0.699 > 8.45 43.66 81.13
 IHD 0.716 0.635–0.797 > 0.0155 52.11 85.85
Corvis ST
 CBI 0.764 0.693–0.834 > 0.0055 71.83 66.98
 TBI 0.892 0.846–0.938 > 0.234 92.96 74.53
 SPA1 0.652 0.568–0.736 ≤ 95.77 46.48 83.96
 DA ratio (2 mm) 0.659 0.576–0.743 > 4.4042 64.79 63.21
 Integrated radius 0.651 0.567–0.735 > 8.893 40.85 87.74

NL normal controls, KCS keratoconus suspect, AUROC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, CI confidence interval.