TABLE 1.
Overview of EPT schemes and their characteristics.
Scheme 1 | Scheme 2 | Scheme 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLA typing | Crossmatching | HLA-specific antibody detection | HLA-specific antibody identification | Patient-based cases | |
Dispatches per year | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Numbers and types of samples per dispatch | 3 tubes of blood | 3 tubes of blood 3 serum samples |
12 vials of serum in one shipment | 12 vials of serum in one shipment | n.a |
Period until deadline | 2 weeks | 2 weeks | 4–5 months | 4–5 months | 2 weeks |
Entrance of results | Manually on the website | Manually on the website | Manually on the website | Manually on the website | By e-mail |
Entrance of results | Eurotransplant match determinants | Positive/negative | Positive/negative | Specificities for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DR, -DQ, and -DP | Answer and motivation related to the case |
Time for the assessment of the results | 2 weeks; reports are published on the EPT website | 2 weeks; reports are published on the EPT website | 1 month; reports are published on the EPT website | 1 month; reports are published on the EPT website | 2 months; the summary is published on the EPT website |
Assessment method | Based on 75% consensus | Based on 75% consensus | Detection 75% consensus | Identification CDC: 75% consensus; bead-based methods: 95% consensus |
Not assessed; a summary with all the results is published |
Maximum yearly discrepancy rate | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | n.a |
Methods assessed | CDC and low-resolution HLA typing | CDC | Bead-based methods, CDC | CDC, single antigen bead assays and complement-dependent SA bead assays | n.a |
Number of participants in 2023 | 68 | 66 | 76 | 76 | 52 |