Table 7.
Robustness test results using the system GMM method.
| Dependent variables |
Z-score |
1/NPL |
Z-score |
1/NPL |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |||||
| Co.eff | t.stat | Co.eff | t.stat | Co.eff | t.stat | Co.eff | t.stat | |
| Lag(SB) | 0.887∗∗∗ | 13.35 | 0.909∗∗∗ | 11.25 | 0.952∗∗∗ | 20.52 | 0.899∗∗∗ | 17.15 |
| LIMS | 0.398∗∗ | 1.95 | 0.007 | 1.34 | ||||
| LIMG | 0.672∗ | 1.86 | 0.028∗∗∗ | 2.61 | ||||
| LIMG2 | −2.329∗∗∗ | −2.43 | −0.584∗∗ | −2.15 | ||||
| HHI | 2.377∗ | 1.70 | 0.033 | 0.54 | 3.010∗∗∗ | 2.33 | 0.059 | 1.12 |
| BCON | 0.008 | 0.69 | 0.000 | 0.20 | 0.006 | 0.70 | 0.000 | −0.11 |
| GDP | −0.120 | −0.71 | 0.002 | 0.23 | −0.187 | −1.21 | 0.002 | 0.21 |
| PPG | −0.018 | −0.14 | −0.010∗ | −1.77 | −0.072 | −0.72 | −0.007 | −1.39 |
| CISH | 0.121∗∗∗ | 3.31 | 0.001 | 1.52 | 0.115∗∗∗ | 3.67 | 0.001∗∗ | 1.90 |
| LER | 0.061 | 0.83 | −0.004 | −0.91 | 0.020 | 0.29 | −0.006 | −1.04 |
| WGI | 0.287∗∗ | 1.91 | 0.008∗ | 1.76 | 0.113∗∗∗ | 2.48 | 0.010 | 1.60 |
| NII | −0.009∗∗ | −1.90 | −0.002∗∗∗ | −3.31 | 0.007 | 0.78 | −0.002∗∗∗ | −3.37 |
| Cons | 0.545 | 0.31 | 0.107 | 1.07 | 0.613 | 0.33 | 0.135 | 1.21 |
| Observation | 473 | 343 | 473 | 343 | ||||
| Instrument | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||
| AR(2)-p.value | 0.782 | 0.311 | 0.681 | 0.564 | ||||
| Hansen J-p.value | 0.436 | 0.236 | 0.408 | 0.450 | ||||
Note: This table reports the system GMM estimation results for Equations (1), (2)) using the Z-score and 1/NPL as dependent variables. Regressions 1–2 and 3–4 show the results for Equations (1), (2)), respectively. Lag (BS) is the one-year lag of dependent variables. ∗, ∗∗, and ∗∗∗ indicate statistical significance at the 10 %, 5 %, and 1 % levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A.