Table 7.
Comparison table of performance of TDIA with some compounds reported in the literature.
| Compound (Concn) |
Technique |
Coupon Type |
Corrosive Medium |
Corrosion Rate (mmyear−1) |
% IE |
Ref |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 °C | 45 °C | 65 °C | 25 °C | 45 °C | 65 °C | |||||
| Equisetum arvense extract (300 ppm) | Wt Loss | Carbon Steel | 2M HCl | 0.58 | 1.45 | – | 95.2 | 91.7 | – | [26] |
| PDP | – | – | – | 97.4 | – | – | ||||
| Ammonium-based ionic liquid (120 ppm) | Wt Loss | CuNi alloy | 3.5 % NaCl + 100 Sulfide | 1.69 | – | – | – | – | – | [24] |
| PDP | – | – | 98.4 | – | – | |||||
| Bladder wrack extract (600 ppm) | Wt Loss | C1020 CS | 1M HCl | 0.149 | – | – | 94.6 | – | – | [25] |
| PDP | – | – | – | 92.2 | – | – | ||||
| Triazole | Wt Loss | C1020 CS | 2 % HCl | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| PDP | 36.42 | – | – | 85.9 | – | – | [27] | |||
| Thiabendazole (10 mM) | Wt Loss | C1020 CS | 1 M HCl | – | – | – | – | – | – | [74] |
| PDP | 0.234 | – | – | 87.86 | – | – | ||||
| Benzethonium chloride ((0.35 mM) | Wt Loss | 316L SS | 1 M H2SO4 | – | – | – | 92.3 | – | – | [18] |
| PDP | – | – | – | 95.9 | – | – | ||||
| 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine (600 ppm) | Wt Loss | Titanium | 1 M H2SO4 | – | – | – | 73.0 | – | – | [12] |
| PDP | – | – | – | – | – | |||||
| TDIA (60 ppm) | Wt Loss | 304L SS | 1M HCl-3.5 % NaCl mix | 0.119 | 0.274 | 1.186 | 89.99 | 87.35 | 84.47 | This Work |
| PDP | 0.027 | – | – | 98.06 | – | – | ||||
NB: CS= Carbon steel; SS = Stainless steel; Wt Loss = Weight loss.