Table 2.
Automated Segmentation and Re-Evaluated Segmentation of GCC Thickness
| Automated (µm)* | Corrected (µm)* | Mean Thickness Difference (µm) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC | 38.0 ± 13.9 | 19.6 ± 10.3 | 18.4 | 
| IR | 80.0 ± 15.3 | 55.0 ± 18.0 | 25.0 | 
| IS | 82.4 ± 16.3 | 58.9 ± 20.3 | 24.5 | 
| IN | 84.8 ± 18.8 | 55.6 ± 22.7 | 29.3 | 
| II | 81.1 ± 17.0 | 56.2 ± 18.1 | 24.9 | 
| IT | 71.7 ± 13.4 | 49.5 ± 16.3 | 22.2 | 
| ER | 76.9 ± 14.8 | 58.2 ± 20.2 | 18.7 | 
| ES | 77.3 ± 16.5 | 57.0 ± 13.1 | 20.3 | 
| EN | 82.2 ± 20.4 | 61.1 ± 25.0 | 21.1 | 
| EI | 76.2 ± 15.2 | 59.8 ± 26.2 | 16.4 | 
| ET | 71.8 ± 10.3 | 55.0 ± 15.5 | 16.9 | 
Mean ± SD for ETDRS sectors. Automated segmentations were obtained from the Canon OCT-HS100; corrected segmentation, from the IRA. For abbreviations, see Figure 1.