Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 27;2024:8696008. doi: 10.1155/2024/8696008

Table 4.

Influence of surface conditioning methods, thickness of ZrO2 specimens, and the cement type on ΔL∗, Δa∗, Δb∗, and ΔE00 values.

Measure Cement type Zirconia thickness (mm) Linear regression results
R 2 Constant Coefficient of regression
ΔE 00 PO 0.7 0.020 6.59 −0.037 p = 0.332
1.0 0.038 5.29 0.038 p = 0.185
PC 0.7 0.670 4.06 0.374 p  < 0.001
1.0 0.636 2.65 0.357 p  < 0.001

ΔL ∗ PO 0.7 0.007 7.22 0.014 p = 0.561
1.0 0.029 6.35 −0.019 p = 0.244
PC 0.7 0.854 −6.30 0.187 p  < 0.001
1.0 0.618 −5.07 0.149 p  < 0.001

Δa ∗ PO 0.7 0.072 −1.26 −0.009 p = 0.065
1.0 0.025 −0.19 −0.009 p = 0.281
PC 0.7 0.637 −2.09 0.094 p  < 0.001
1.0 0.948 −2.28 0.104 p  < 0.001

Δb ∗ PO 0.7 0.006 4.66 0.006 p = 0.595
1.0 0.039 5.75 0.020 p = 0.180
PC 0.7 0.625 −9.66 0.161 p  < 0.001
1.0 0.597 −8.63 0.108 p  < 0.001

Abbreviations: PC, translucent cement; PO, opaque cement.

For coefficients of regression differing significantly from zero, corresponding p-values are highlighted with bold font.