Table 3.
Ranking of accessibility averages for different friction coefficients (sheets/thousand people).
Ranking | = 1.0 | = 1.5 | = 2.0 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Gulou | 5.39 | Gulou | 8.32 | Gulou | 10.11 |
2 | Qinhuai | 3.42 | Qinhuai | 3.99 | Yuhuatai | 5.08 |
3 | Jianye | 2.48 | Yuhuatai | 3.57 | Qinhuai | 4.01 |
4 | Yuhuatai | 2.42 | Jianye | 2.87 | Jianye | 3.21 |
5 | Xuanwu | 2.39 | Xuanwu | 2.30 | Xuanwu | 1.88 |
6 | Qixia | 0.86 | Gaochun | 1.14 | Gaochun | 1.32 |
7 | Jiangning | 0.78 | Qixia | 0.85 | Qixia | 0.76 |
8 | Gaochun | 0.78 | Pukou | 0.73 | Pukou | 0.65 |
9 | Pukou | 0.77 | Jiangning | 0.72 | Jiangning | 0.60 |
10 | Luhe | 0.53 | Lishui | 0.58 | Lishui | 0.52 |
11 | Lishui | 0.50 | Luhe | 0.56 | Luhe | 0.52 |