Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 7;10:20552076241287636. doi: 10.1177/20552076241287636

Table 1.

A comparison of readers and non-readers regarding socio-demographic and psychographic factors.

Total Has read, n = 2086 (77%) Has never read, n = 632 (23%) p*
Gender <0.001
 Female 1872 (70%) 1473 (71%) 399 (64%)
 Male 821 (30%) 594 (29%) 227 (36%)
Mean Age 50 48 56 <0.001
 [Min-Max] [17–96] [17–90] [18–96]
Education 0.014
 Primary education 192 (7%) 131 (6%) 61 (10%)
 High school 842 (31%) 648 (31%) 194 (31%)
 University or college 1660 (62%) 1289 (62%) 371 (59%)
Marital status 0.033
 Married, registered partner or Stable partner 2009 (75%) 1559 (77%) 450 (72%)
 Single 654 (25%) 481 (23%) 173 (28%)
Health 0.561
 Good or very good 1943 (72%) 1487 (71%) 456 (72%)
 Neither good nor bad 542 (20%) 414 (20%) 128 (20%)
 Bad or very bad 226 (8%) 180 (9%) 46 (7%)
Internet use <0.001
 Daily 2674 (98%) 2074 (99%) 600 (95%)
 Every week or Every month, Sometimes or Never 44 (2%) 12 (1%) 32 (5%)
Accessible devices <0.001
 Smartphones 2640 (97%) 2055 (99%) 585 (93%)
 Just phone without apps, computer, tablet or non 76 (3%) 29 (1%) 47 (7%)
It is good for me to read <0.001
 Strongly agree/agree 2036 (93%) 1938 (94%) 98 (72%)
 Partially agree, disagree/strongly disagree 161 (7%) 122 (6%) 39 (28%)
The ability to retrieve health information <0.001
 High 1813 (67%) 1442 (69%) 371 (59%)
 Low 894 (33%) 638 (31%) 256 (41%)
The ability to select information <0.001
 High 1765 (65%) 1414 (68%) 351 (56%)
 Low 937 (35%) 662 (32%) 275 (44%)
The ability to understand information <0.001
 High 1896 (70%) 1498 (72%) 398 (63%)
 Low 804 (30%) 575 (28%) 229 (37%)
The ability to judge the reliability of information <0.001
 High 1823 (67%) 1440 (69%) 383 (61%)
 Low 881 (33%) 638 (31%) 243 (39%)

*The p-value was determined using chi-square and t-test depending on the variable.