Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 7;25:792. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07868-2

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of the included studies

Article Year country Number of Patients Number of THAs Age* Gender
M/F
BMI* Diagnosis**
(% patients)
Number of Surgeons Handedness Surgical Approach Type of acetabular cup fixation Mean operative time (Min.)
Dominant Non-dominant
Pennington et al. 2014 UK 160 160 NR NR NR OA (100%) 4 2 RHD, 2LHD

-PLA (2 surgeons, one RHD and one LHD).

-DLA (2 surgeons, one RHD and one LHD)

NR NR
Song et al. 2018 China 498 996

45.8 ± 13

(20–83)

307/191

24.4 ± 3.95

(13.2–44.8)

ONFH (48.2%)

OA (22.5%)

AS (21.5%)

DDH (4.8%)

RA (3.0%)

3 RHD PLA cementless 83.8 85.8
Kong et al. (PLA) 2020 China 62 124

40.18 ± 11

(21–67)

38/24

21.9 ± 2.89

(17.93–29.21)

ONFH 67.74%,

DDH 25.81%,

Others 6.45%

2 RHD PLA cementless NR
Kong et al. (DAA) 2020 China 102 204 43.39 ± 12 59/43 22.7 ± 2.79

ONFH 94.12%,

DDH 2.94%,

RA 2.94%

1 RHD DAA cementless NR

*Data presented as Mean ± SD (range). **Data presented as percentages. PLA: posterolateral approach, DAA: direct anterior approach, UK: United Kingdom, M: male, F: female, NR: not reported, BMI: body mass index, OA: osteoarthritis, ONFH: osteonecrosis of the femoral head, AS: ankylosing spondylitis, DDH: developmental dysplasia of the hip, RA: rheumatoid arthritis, RHD: right-handed, LHD: left-handed, DLA: direct lateral approach, Min.: minutes