Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 7;55:133. doi: 10.1186/s13567-024-01385-9

Table 2.

Prevalence of Blastocystis subtypes in Spanish wild boars (n= 360) according to the bioregion of origin, type of sampling site, and sampling year.

Variable Samples (n) Blastocystis-positive (n)a Blastocystis-positive (%) 95% CI (%) P value Subtypes detectedb (n)
Bioregion < 0.001
BR1 21 8 38.1 18.1–61.6 ST5 (8)
BR2 39 9 23.1 11.1–39.3 ST5 (7), ST5/ST15 (1)
BR3 150 13 8.7 4.7–14.4 ST5 (2)
BR4 8 0 0.0
BR5 142 6 4.2 1.6–9.0 ST5 (4)
Type of sampling site < 0.001
Hunting state 197 22 11.2 7.1–16.4 ST5 (9), ST5/ST15 (1)
Game reserve 21 8 38.1 18.1–61.6 ST5 (8)
Natural protected area 97 4 4.1 1.1–10.2 ST5 (4)
Urban/suburban 45 2 4.4 0.5–15.2 Not available
Sampling yearc < 0.001
2014 26 9 34.6 17.2–55.7 ST5 (7), ST5/ST15 (1)
2018 148 6 4.1 1.5–8.6 ST5 (4)
2019 52 6 11.5 4.3–23.4 ST5 (2)
2020 70 5 7.1 2.4–15.9 Not available
2021 60 9 15.0 7.1–26.6 ST5 (7)

95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are included. The values in bold represent statistical significance and subtypes previously reported in humans (regardeless of their true zoonotic potential).

aSamples were considered positive when Blastocystis was identified after Sanger and next-generation sequencing.

bSubtype information is only included for the 22 samples in which next-generation amplicon sequencing was conducted.

cFour samples from unknown sampling years, with one of the samples positive for Blastocystis ST5.