Chart 2. Studies selected in this systematic review.
| Resources | Sample size* | Nation | Study types** | Type of AI assessment*** |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lee et al. (2022)(4) | 200 | South Korea | Retrospective | Radiologist without AI vs. Radiologist with AI |
| Zhou et al. (2023)(5) | 880 | China | Retrospective | Radiologist without AI vs. Radiologist with AI |
| Rodríguez-Ruiz et al. (2019)(10) | 240 | USA and Netherlands | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI AND Radiologist without AI vs. Radiologist with AI |
| Sun et al. (2021)(36) | 200 | China | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI AND Radiologist without AI vs. Radiologist with AI |
| 5,746 | China | Prospective | Radiologist with AI | |
| Lee et al. (2024)(34) | 2,061 | South Korea | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI AND Radiologist without AI vs. Radiologist with AI |
| Yala et al. (2019)(11) | 26,540 | USA | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Rodríguez-Ruiz et al. (2019)(12) | 2,652 | Netherlands | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Liao et al. (2023)(35) | 460 | China | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Leibig et al. (2022)(13) | 82,851 | Germany | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Marinovich et al. (2023)(14) | 108,970 | Australia | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Akselrod-Ballin et al. (2019)(15) | 2,548 | Israel | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Lauritzen et al. (2022)(17) | 114,421 | Denmark | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Salim et al. (2020)(18) | 8,805 | Sweden | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Sharma et al. (2023)(19) | 275,900 | UK and Hungary | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Yirgin et al. (2022)(20) | 22,621 | Türkiye | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Bao et al. (2023)(21) | 643 | China | Retrospective | Radiologist without AI vs. Radiologist with AI |
| Dang et al. (2022)(22) | 314 | France | Retrospective | Radiologist without AI vs. Radiologist with AI |
| Watanabe et al. (2019)(23) | 122 | USA | Retrospective | Radiologist without AI vs. Radiologist with AI |
| Kim et al. (2022)(24) | 793 | South Korea | Retrospective | Radiologist without AI vs. Radiologist with AI |
| Pacilè et al. (2020)(25) | 240 | France | Retrospective | Radiologist without AI vs. Radiologist with AI |
| Romero-Martín et al. (2022)(26) | 15,999 | Spain | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Hsu et al. (2022)(27) | 37,317 | USA | Retrospective | Radiologist without AI vs. Radiologist with AI |
| Liu et al. (2021)(28) | 51 | China | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Sasaki et al. (2020)(29) | 310 | Japan | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Al-Bazzaz et al. (2024)(30) | 758 | Sweden | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI AND Radiologist without AI vs. Radiologist with AI |
| Do et al. (2021)(31) | 435 | South Korea | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Elhakim et al. (2023)(32) | 257,671 | Denmark | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI AND Radiologist without AI vs. Radiologist with AI |
| Kühl et al. (2024)(33) | 249,402 | Denmark | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Waugh et al. (2024)(37) | 7,533 | Australia | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
| Yoon et al. (2023)(38) | 6,499 | South Korea | Retrospective | Radiologist vs. AI |
Description - The table presents all articles with their sample size, country, type of study, and type of AI assessment. *Sample size - number of mammograms analyzed; **Study types - retrospective OR prospective; ***Type of AI assessment - radiologist vs. AI (independent reader) OR radiologist without AI vs. radiologist with AI (combined reader)