Table 2.

Associations between child CU traits and child and parent linguistic markers

	Model 1: Child linguistic markers (correlated dependent variables)
	Interruption				Speech Rate				Positive emotion words				Sad words				Anger words
	B	SE	β	p	B	SE	β	p	B	SE	β	p	B	SE	β	p	B	SE	β	p
Study condition	1.29	5.51	0.02	0.81	− 0.23	2.00	− 0.01	0.91	− 0.13	0.07	− 0.13	0.11	− 0.08	0.06	− 0.11	0.18	− 0.05	0.06	− 0.07	0.41
Child sex	25.20	8.26	0.27	< 0.001	3.36	3.22	0.09	0.30	0.11	0.12	0.07	0.37	0.05	0.09	0.04	0.58	0.01	0.12	0.01	0.93
Child age	12.19	7.76	0.14	0.08	7.41	3.27	0.23	0.02	− 0.26	0.18	− 0.18	0.07	− 0.23	0.09	− 0.23	0.01	− 0.09	0.10	− 0.09	0.35
Parent education	4.23	3.60	0.11	0.22	− 0.12	1.71	− 0.01	0.94	− 0.02	0.12	− 0.02	0.90	0.03	0.05	0.06	0.54	0.01	0.05	0.02	0.85
CU traits	13.65	8.21	0.15	0.08	0.11	3.00	0.003	0.97	− 0.26	0.14	− 0.16	0.04	− 0.09	0.10	− 0.08	0.37	− 0.09	0.10	− 0.08	0.35
	Model 2: Parent linguistic markers (correlated dependent variables)
	Interruption				Speech Rate				Positive emotion words				Sad words				Anger words
	B	SE	β	p	B	SE	β	p	B	SE	β	p	B	SE	β	p	B	SE	β	p
Study condition	-1.47	7.57	− 0.01	0.85	0.19	3.11	0.01	0.95	0.01	0.06	0.01	0.90	0.01	0.03	0.01	0.87	− 0.04	0.04	− 0.07	0.39
Child sex	5.82	14.78	0.04	0.70	1.82	5.31	0.03	0.73	0.07	0.10	0.07	0.50	− 0.03	0.05	− 0.05	0.52	0.08	0.06	0.10	0.20
Child age	22.52	14.01	0.15	0.10	2.24	4.76	0.04	0.64	0.02	0.08	0.03	0.76	− 0.13	0.05	− 0.21	0.02	− 0.03	0.06	− 0.04	0.66
Parent education	-16.07	8.40	− 0.23	0.05	5.29	2.05	0.22	0.01	0.00	0.03	0.01	0.93	− 0.05	0.04	− 0.17	0.18	0.00	0.04	0.01	0.92
CU traits	14.75	16.32	0.09	0.39	0.44	4.73	0.01	0.93	− 0.21	0.09	− 0.21	0.01	− 0.10	0.07	− 0.15	0.10	− 0.04	0.07	− 0.05	0.59

Note. For Model 1, all child linguistic markers were included as correlated dependent variables in a single model (see Table S2). For Model 2, all parent linguistic markers were included as correlated dependent variables in a single model (see Table S2).