Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 16;2(3):qyae094. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae094

Table 3.

Distribution of CMR scans and segmentations judged of good or acceptable quality (score 1 or 2) according to the CMR image sequence

CMR image sequence Proportion of studies with good/acceptable quality
LV contours
 Short axis (SAX) stack 99.8% (n = 1976/1980)
 Long axis 2-chamber 99.6% (n = 1974/1982)
 Long axis 3-chamber 99.7% (n = 1979/1984)
 Long axis 4-chamber 99.8% (n = 1981/1985)
RV contours
 Short axis (SAX) stack 99.8% (n = 1977/1980)
 Long axis 4-chamber 99.9% (n = 1983/1985)
LA contours
 Long axis 4-chamber 99.6% (n = 1978/1985)
 Long axis 2-chamber 97.0% (n = 1965/1982)
RA contours
 Long axis 4-chamber 99.8% (n = 1981/1985)
Native T1 maps 98.9% (n = 1909/1930)
Aortic valve flow 99.7% (n = 1923/1928)

The proportion of studies deemed of good/acceptable quality was calculated per each image sequence after removing the studies with missing images or clips, which were due to that image sequence not being performed for those studies or corrupted files not being recognized by software.

LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle; LA, left atrium; RA, right atrium.