Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 9.
Published in final edited form as: NMR Biomed. 2019 Oct 14;32(12):e4176. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4176

TABLE 3.

Comparison of model 2 and model 1 fitting to Z‐spectra data obtained at B1rms of 1.4 μT and duration of 2 seconds from gray matter tissue of human brain using Monte‐Carlo simulations

Amplitude (%) Width (ppm)
DS MT rNOE Cr‐w CEST CEST@3.5 ppm DS MT rNOE Cr‐w CEST CEST@3.5 ppm
Model 2 Par0 52.22 36.51 10.38 6.22 7.09 2.31 45.12 5.27 1.99 3.39
mean ± SD 51.96 ± 1.61 38.38 ± 2.01 11.12 ± 1.68 6.86 ± 1.89 7.19 ± 1.73 2.30 ± 0.12 50.12 ± 3.65 5.51 ± 1.14 2.25 ± 0.90 3.60 ± 1.29
ARPE 2.46 6.18 14.68 25.96 19.92 4.27 12.12 17.60 38.74 31.70
Model 1 Par0 51.07 33.99 12.55 5.96 7.79 2.27 46.72 6.96 2.19 4.58
mean ± SD 50.55 ± 2.02 34.90 ± 2.42 13.97 ± 2.15 6.64 ± 2.16 8.04 ± 2.00 2.25 ± 0.13 53.75 ± 5.64 7.65 ± 1.79 2.46 ± 1.01 5.41 ± 2.02
ARPE 3.33 6.06 17.15 29.55 20.79 4.56 16.13 22.66 41.70 37.97

Abbreviations: ARPE, average absolute relative percentage error; CEST@3.5 ppm, CEST contrast at 3.5 ppm; Cr‐w CEST, CEST contrast at 1.8 ppm; DS, direct saturation; MT, magnetization transfer; rNOE, relayed nuclear Overhauser effect; Par0, parameters obtained from fitting of Z‐spectra without noise; SD, standard deviation.