Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 22;8(19):5012–5021. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013101

Table 2.

Treatment responses per IMWG-URC in patients with RRMM treated with once-weekly KRd56 vs twice-weekly KRd27 over the study duration

Once-weekly KRd56 (N = 228) Twice-weekly KRd27 (N = 226)
ORR, % (95% CI) 82.5 (76.9-87.2) 86.3 (81.1-90.5)
1-sided P 0.0666
Risk ratio (95% CI) 0.954 (0.882-1.032)
Best overall response, n (%)
 Stringent CR 46 (20.2) 30 (13.3)
 CR 61 (26.8) 52 (23.0)
 VGPR 59 (25.9) 80 (35.4)
 PR 22 (9.6) 33 (14.6)
 Stable disease or progressive disease 19 (8.3) 20 (8.8)
 Not evaluable 21 (9.2) 11 (4.9)
Median time to response§, mo (range) 1.0 (1-10) 1.0 (1-12)

IMWG-URC, International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria; VGPR, very good partial response.

P was calculated via the synthesis approach (US Food and Drug Administration, 2016)17 for noninferiority comparison of ORR between treatment groups.

Seven patients had no postbaseline visit (including 5 deaths in cycle 1; 2 patients ended the study on days 46 and 62, respectively), 7 patients had 1 postbaseline visit, 4 patients had nonmeasurable disease, 1 patient had 2 baseline visits, 1 patient had no postbaseline plasmacytoma assessment, and 1 patient achieved a PR per investigator evaluation.

Four patients had no postbaseline visit (including 1 death each on days 17 and 76), 3 patients had 1 postbaseline visit, and 4 patients had nonmeasurable disease.

§

Time from the randomization date to the earliest date of confirmation of a PR or better.