Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 10.
Published in final edited form as: Zoonoses Public Health. 2020 Nov;67(Suppl 1):6–21. doi: 10.1111/zph.12760

TABLE 4.

Mean and median use (mg of active ingredients per kg of liveweight marketed) in 2016 and 2017 across systems using the respective antimicrobials

2016 2017
Active ingredient # systems Mean Median # systems Mean Median
Amoxicillin 4 4.0 1.9 5 2.2 0.73
Ampicillin 2 0.04 0.04 1 0.006 0.006
Avilamycin 3 0.39 0.04 4 1.76 0.81
Bacitracin 5 50.1 6.6 2 38.2 38.2
Carbadox 6 5.0 2.1 7 3.7 2.3
Ceftiofur 9 0.20 0.06 9 0.15 0.10
Chlortetracycline 9 139.4 73.4 9 70.4 55.1
Enrofloxacin 9 0.29 0.27 9 0.49 0.26
Flavomycin 1 0.014 0.014 0
Florfenicol 5 0.013 0.007 4 0.07 0.05
Gentamicin 6 0.21 0.20 7 0.12 0.11
Lincomycin 9 42.5 3.8 9 10.1 2.3
Narasin 2 10.7 10.7 1 23.3 23.3
Neomycin 9 5.2 3.8 9 5.9 3.9
Oxytetracycline 7 15.0 4.8 6 21.9 3.8
Penicillin 9 6.6 1.7 9 8.4 2.6
Spectinomycin 2 2.3 2.3 1 0.03 0.03
Sulphadimethoxine 1 0.05 0.05 1 0.86 0.86
Sulphamethazine 1 6.0 6.0 3 3.04 2.97
Sulphmethoxazole 1 0.004 0.004 0
Tetracycline 3 0.52 0.61 2 0.63 0.63
Tiamulin 9 14.5 8.4 9 8.8 6.0
Tilmicosin 8 1.34 0.74 7 3.6 0.56
Trimethoprim/Sulphadiazine 2 0.76 0.76 5 1.3 0.59
Tulathromycin 7 0.87 0.01 7 0.02 0.002
Tylosin 9 1.89 0.22 8 0.45 0.13
Tylvalosin 6 1.6 1.1 5 1.9 1.8
Virginiamycin 3 6.8 2.8 1 0.0004 0.0004