Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 9;24:2757. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20214-4

Table 2.

Relationship of IR surrogate indicators or sarcopenia status with stroke risk

Characteristics Crude model Adjusted model P for interactionc
HR(95%CI) P HR(95%CI) P
IR surrogate indicators
 TyG (per SD) 1.26 (1.16,1.36) < 0.001 1.13 (1.03,1.23) 0.006 0.221
 TyG-BMI (per SD) 1.27 (1.18,1.37) < 0.001 1.10 (1.01,1.20) 0.035 0.384
 TyG-WC (per SD) 1.35 (1.25,1.47) < 0.001 1.12 (1.02,1.22) 0.013 0.222
 TyG-WHtR (per SD) 1.33 (1.23,1.45) < 0.001 1.12 (1.02,1.23) 0.015 0.240
 TG/HDL-C (per SD) 1.12 (1.06,1.19) < 0.001 1.06 (0.99,1.14) 0.087 0.164
 METS-IR (per SD) 1.27 (1.18,1.37) < 0.001 1.11 (1.02,1.21) 0.017 0.596
Sarcopenia statusa
 Non-sarcopenia 1.00(Reference) 1.00(Reference)
 Possible sarcopenia 1.90 (1.58,2.28) < 0.001 1.49(1.23,1.81) < 0.001
 Sarcopenia 1.44 (1.08,1.91) 0.013 1.30 (0.95,1.77) 0.101
Sarcopenia statusb
 Non-sarcopenia 1.00(Reference) 1.00(Reference)
 Possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia 1.77 (1.49,2.11) < 0.001 1.45 (1.20,1.75) < 0.001

Adjusted model: adjusted for Age, Sex, Systolic, Diastolic, Smoking, Drinking, Hypertension, Diabetes, Heart disease, Dyslipidemia, Hypertension medications, Diabetes medications and Dyslipidemia medications. IR surrogate indicators is analyzed as a continuous variable in the table

aSarcopenia status is classified into three categories

bSarcopenia status is classified into two categories

cInteraction between IR surrogate indicators and sarcopenia statusb