Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 10;16(9):e69073. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69073

Table 3. Comparison of gloss by resin composite and polishing system. Before and after the aging process.

X±SD: mean±standard deviation; a p-value < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences, based on the paired t-Student test; GU: gloss units; BA: before aging; AA: after aging.

Resin Treatment Spectra (GU) Tetric (GU) Z250 XT (GU) Zafira (GU)
X±SD X±SD X±SD X±SD
Control BA 71.8 ± 15.5 70.0 ± 8.4 61.8 ± 10.3 66.6 ± 11.0
AA 75.4 ± 9.7 67.0 ± 6.3 66.7 ± 13.4 70.4 ± 13.2
p-value 0.192 0.057 0.076 0.043
Clinical polishing BA  33.5 ± 5.7 39.5 ± 5.0 77.2 ± 3.4 43.8 ± 12.3
AA  25.6 ± 6.5 49.0 ± 8.5 76.2 ± 9.4 34.8 ± 9.5
p-value  0.247 0.045 0.893 0.093
Metallographic polishing BA 87,4 ± 1,7 75.7 ± 11,1 78.3 ± 1.6 92.7 ± 3.8
AA 84.3 ± 2.2 76.1 ± 8.8 79.0 ± 2.3 90.7 ± 4.3
p-value 0.068 0.849 0.218 0.139
Clinical polishing + PermaSeal BA 45.3 ± 11.9 43.9 ± 9.3 53.6 ± 14.0 55.5 ± 7.1
AA 42.9 ± 10.2 47.9 ± 9.8 53.5 ± 3.8 57.2 ± 18.4
p-value 0.786 0.316 0.986 0.887
Glycerin + clinical polishing BA 42.7 ± 10.0 74.7 ± 9.3 78.9 ± 20.4 52.5 ± 14.2
AA 38.5 ± 3.9 56.6 ± 12.2 78.6 ± 11.4 54.8 ± 14.3
p-value  0.652  0.071  0.953  0.760